GPT-OSS 20B (Groq) vs Sonar: API Cost Comparison
Compare the API pricing, context windows, features, and real-world cost projections for GPT-OSS 20B (Groq) (Groq) and Sonar (Perplexity). Use the interactive calculator below to compute your exact monthly cost based on your token usage and request volume.
Prices verified Mar 10, 2026
Interactive Cost Calculator
Fills in typical token counts for a workload type
Tokens in each prompt sent to the model
Tokens generated in each response
Total API calls per month
Showing costs for 2 models. Cheapest: GPT-OSS 20B (Groq) at $2.25/month.
| Alert | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BestGPT-OSS 20B (Groq) | Groq | $2.25 | $0.000225 | $0.75 | $1.50 | 85.0% | Alerts coming soon |
Sonar | Perplexity | $15.00 | $0.001500 | $10.00 | $5.00 | — | Alerts coming soon |
Monthly Cost Comparison
Price Comparison at a Glance
All prices are in USD per 1 million tokens ($/M tokens). Lower is cheaper.
| Pricing Type | GPT-OSS 20B (Groq) | Sonar | Cheaper |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input (standard) | $0.08/M | $1.00/M | GPT-OSS 20B (Groq) |
| Output | $0.30/M | $1.00/M | GPT-OSS 20B (Groq) |
| Cached input | $0.04/M | N/A | — |
Prices last verified: 2026-03-06 – 2026-03-10
Cost Breakdown by Usage Volume
Estimated monthly costs at different request volumes, assuming 1,000 input tokens and 500 output tokens per request. Adjust in the calculator above for your specific use case.
| Volume | GPT-OSS 20B (Groq)Monthly | SonarMonthly | GPT-OSS 20B (Groq)Per request | SonarPer request |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1K requests/mo | $0.22 | $1.50 | $0.000225 | $0.001500 |
| 10K requests/mo | $2.25 | $15.00 | $0.000225 | $0.001500 |
| 100K requests/mo | $22.50 | $150.00 | $0.000225 | $0.001500 |
| 1M requests/mo | $225.00 | $1,500.00 | $0.000225 | $0.001500 |
Green values indicate the lower-cost option at each volume tier. Cost per request is calculated at 1,000 input + 500 output tokens using standard (non-batch, non-cached) pricing.
Price History
Input price per 1M tokensWhen to Choose GPT-OSS 20B (Groq)
by Groq
- Customer support
- Text classification
- General chatbot
Input / 1M tokens
$0.08/M
Output / 1M tokens
$0.30/M
Context window
131,072
Tier
budget
When to Choose Sonar
by Perplexity
- RAG / Semantic search
- General chatbot
Input / 1M tokens
$1.00/M
Output / 1M tokens
$1.00/M
Context window
127,072
Tier
budget
Key Differences Beyond Price
Cost is only one factor in choosing an AI model. Context window size, rate limits, supported features, and latency all affect whether a model fits your use case.
| Capability | GPT-OSS 20B (Groq) | Sonar |
|---|---|---|
| Context window | 131,072 tokens | 127,072 tokens |
| Max output tokens | 32,768 tokens | 8,192 tokens |
| Performance tier | Budget | Budget |
| Vision / image input | No | No |
| Function calling | Yes | No |
| JSON mode | Yes | No |
| Prompt caching | Yes | No |
| Batch API (50% discount) | No | No |
| Extended reasoning | No | No |
| Fine-tuning | No | No |
| Rate limit (req/min) | 30 | Not published |
GPT-OSS 20B (Groq) notes
OpenAI's open-weight MoE model on Groq hardware. Prompt caching available at 50% discount.
Sonar notes
Search pricing: $5-$12 per 1,000 requests depending on context size. Includes grounded real-time web search in every response.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GPT-OSS 20B (Groq) cheaper than Sonar?
At standard usage (1,000 input tokens, 500 output tokens, 100,000 requests/month), GPT-OSS 20B (Groq) costs $22.50/month versus $150.00/month for Sonar — a 85% saving. Your actual savings will vary based on your token profile; output-heavy workloads amplify differences in output pricing.
Which model has a larger context window, GPT-OSS 20B (Groq) or Sonar?
GPT-OSS 20B (Groq) has a larger context window at 131,072 tokens, compared to 127,072 tokens for Sonar. A larger context window is important for processing long documents, multi-turn conversations, or large codebases without truncation.
Do GPT-OSS 20B (Groq) and Sonar support the Batch API?
Neither GPT-OSS 20B (Groq) nor Sonar currently supports a batch API with discounted pricing. For batch-eligible alternatives, consider models from OpenAI, Anthropic, or Google that include batch API support.
Which model offers better prompt caching?
GPT-OSS 20B (Groq) supports prompt caching at $0.04/M for cached input, while Sonar does not offer prompt caching. For RAG applications or chatbots with large, repeated context, GPT-OSS 20B (Groq)'s caching capability can substantially reduce effective costs.
What are the best use cases for GPT-OSS 20B (Groq) vs Sonar?
Both models are well-suited for General chatbot. GPT-OSS 20B (Groq) is particularly strong for Customer support, Text classification. Sonar is favored for RAG / Semantic search. At the same quality level, the lower-cost model is usually preferable; use this page's calculator to compare total monthly spend at your volume.
What is the cost per request for GPT-OSS 20B (Groq) vs Sonar?
At 1,000 input tokens and 500 output tokens per request — a typical conversational workload — GPT-OSS 20B (Groq) costs $0.000225 per request and Sonar costs $0.001500 per request. At 100,000 requests/month, that translates to $22.50 and $150.00 respectively. Use the interactive calculator to adjust these parameters for your actual workload.
GPT-OSS 20B (Groq) vs Sonar: Summary
When comparing GPT-OSS 20B (Groq) and Sonar for API cost, the right choice depends on your workload's token profile, required features, and tolerance for latency. GPT-OSS 20B (Groq) offers lower total cost at standard usage volumes (1,000 input + 500 output tokens per request at 100,000 requests/month) at $22.50/month, compared to $150.00/month for Sonar.
Both models are priced in USD per million tokens, the standard unit across all major AI API providers. GPT-OSS 20B (Groq) charges $0.08/M for input tokens and $0.30/M for output tokens. Sonar charges $1.00/M input and $1.00/M output. If your workload is output-heavy (more tokens generated than consumed as input), the model with the lower output price compounds cost savings significantly at scale.
Prompt caching is supported by GPT-OSS 20B (Groq) but not Sonar. For workloads with large, repeated system prompts or document context — such as RAG pipelines or multi-turn conversations with a fixed knowledge base — prompt caching can reduce effective input costs by 60–90%, which may change the cost ranking between these two models at your specific usage pattern.
Context window capacity differs between the two: GPT-OSS 20B (Groq) supports up to 131,072 tokens in a single request, versus 127,072 tokens for Sonar. A larger context window is essential for document summarization, large codebase analysis, and multi-document retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) applications.
Use the interactive calculator at the top of this page to enter your actual token usage and monthly request volume for a precise cost comparison tailored to your workload. Adjust for batch API discounts and prompt caching to find the most cost-effective option for your specific deployment.
Related Comparisons
Explore other model comparisons from the same providers or performance tiers.
Related Provider Pages
View complete pricing tables and model lineups for the providers behind these models.
Relevant Use Cases
See cost recommendations for workloads where GPT-OSS 20B (Groq) or Sonar is recommended.