Skip to main content

GPT-4o mini vs GPT-OSS 20B (Groq): API Cost Comparison

Compare the API pricing, context windows, features, and real-world cost projections for GPT-4o mini (OpenAI) and GPT-OSS 20B (Groq) (Groq). Use the interactive calculator below to compute your exact monthly cost based on your token usage and request volume.

Prices verified Mar 6, 2026

Interactive Cost Calculator

OpenAIGPT-4o miniGroqGPT-OSS 20B (Groq)

Fills in typical token counts for a workload type

Tokens in each prompt sent to the model

Tokens generated in each response

Total API calls per month

Showing costs for 2 models. Cheapest: GPT-OSS 20B (Groq) at $2.25/month.

Cheapest: GPT-OSS 20B (Groq) at $2.25/mo — save 50.0% vs GPT-4o mini
Alert
BestGPT-OSS 20B (Groq)
Groq$2.25$0.000225$0.75$1.5050.0%Alerts coming soon
GPT-4o mini
OpenAI$4.50$0.000450$1.50$3.00Alerts coming soon

Monthly Cost Comparison

Price Comparison at a Glance

All prices are in USD per 1 million tokens ($/M tokens). Lower is cheaper.

Pricing TypeGPT-4o miniGPT-OSS 20B (Groq)Cheaper
Input (standard)$0.15/M$0.08/MGPT-OSS 20B (Groq)
Output$0.60/M$0.30/MGPT-OSS 20B (Groq)
Cached input$0.08/M$0.04/MGPT-OSS 20B (Groq)
Batch input$0.08/MN/A
Batch output$0.30/MN/A

Prices last verified: 2026-03-06

Cost Breakdown by Usage Volume

Estimated monthly costs at different request volumes, assuming 1,000 input tokens and 500 output tokens per request. Adjust in the calculator above for your specific use case.

VolumeGPT-4o miniMonthlyGPT-OSS 20B (Groq)MonthlyGPT-4o miniPer requestGPT-OSS 20B (Groq)Per request
1K requests/mo$0.45$0.22$0.000450$0.000225
10K requests/mo$4.50$2.25$0.000450$0.000225
100K requests/mo$45.00$22.50$0.000450$0.000225
1M requests/mo$450.00$225.00$0.000450$0.000225

Green values indicate the lower-cost option at each volume tier. Cost per request is calculated at 1,000 input + 500 output tokens using standard (non-batch, non-cached) pricing.

Price History

Input price per 1M tokens

When to Choose GPT-4o mini

by OpenAI

  • Text classification
  • Customer support
  • Data extraction

Input / 1M tokens

$0.15/M

Output / 1M tokens

$0.60/M

Context window

128,000

Tier

budget

When to Choose GPT-OSS 20B (Groq)

by Groq

  • Customer support
  • Text classification
  • General chatbot

Input / 1M tokens

$0.08/M

Output / 1M tokens

$0.30/M

Context window

131,072

Tier

budget

Key Differences Beyond Price

Cost is only one factor in choosing an AI model. Context window size, rate limits, supported features, and latency all affect whether a model fits your use case.

CapabilityGPT-4o miniGPT-OSS 20B (Groq)
Context window128,000 tokens131,072 tokens
Max output tokens16,384 tokens32,768 tokens
Performance tierBudgetBudget
Vision / image inputYesNo
Function callingYesYes
JSON modeYesYes
Prompt cachingYesYes
Batch API (50% discount)YesNo
Extended reasoningNoNo
Fine-tuningYesNo
Rate limit (req/min)10,00030

GPT-4o mini notes

Best cost-performance ratio for high-volume lightweight workloads.

GPT-OSS 20B (Groq) notes

OpenAI's open-weight MoE model on Groq hardware. Prompt caching available at 50% discount.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is GPT-4o mini cheaper than GPT-OSS 20B (Groq)?

At standard usage (1,000 input tokens, 500 output tokens, 100,000 requests/month), GPT-OSS 20B (Groq) costs $22.50/month versus $45.00/month for GPT-4o mini — a 50% saving. Your actual savings will vary based on your token profile; output-heavy workloads amplify differences in output pricing.

Which model has a larger context window, GPT-4o mini or GPT-OSS 20B (Groq)?

GPT-OSS 20B (Groq) has a larger context window at 131,072 tokens, compared to 128,000 tokens for GPT-4o mini. A larger context window is important for processing long documents, multi-turn conversations, or large codebases without truncation.

Do GPT-4o mini and GPT-OSS 20B (Groq) support the Batch API?

GPT-4o mini supports the Batch API (50% discount for async processing), while GPT-OSS 20B (Groq) does not. If your workload tolerates up to 24-hour latency, routing to GPT-4o mini with batch pricing could significantly cut costs versus GPT-OSS 20B (Groq)'s standard rate.

Which model offers better prompt caching?

Both GPT-4o mini and GPT-OSS 20B (Groq) support prompt caching. GPT-4o mini caches repeated input at $0.08/M (vs $0.15/M standard), while GPT-OSS 20B (Groq) caches at $0.04/M (vs $0.08/M standard). For workloads with large, repeated system prompts or document context, caching can reduce effective input costs by 60–90%.

What are the best use cases for GPT-4o mini vs GPT-OSS 20B (Groq)?

Both models are well-suited for Text classification, Customer support. GPT-4o mini is particularly strong for Data extraction. GPT-OSS 20B (Groq) is favored for General chatbot. At the same quality level, the lower-cost model is usually preferable; use this page's calculator to compare total monthly spend at your volume.

What is the cost per request for GPT-4o mini vs GPT-OSS 20B (Groq)?

At 1,000 input tokens and 500 output tokens per request — a typical conversational workload — GPT-4o mini costs $0.000450 per request and GPT-OSS 20B (Groq) costs $0.000225 per request. At 100,000 requests/month, that translates to $45.00 and $22.50 respectively. Use the interactive calculator to adjust these parameters for your actual workload.

GPT-4o mini vs GPT-OSS 20B (Groq): Summary

When comparing GPT-4o mini and GPT-OSS 20B (Groq) for API cost, the right choice depends on your workload's token profile, required features, and tolerance for latency. GPT-OSS 20B (Groq) offers lower total cost at standard usage volumes (1,000 input + 500 output tokens per request at 100,000 requests/month) at $22.50/month, compared to $45.00/month for GPT-4o mini.

Both models are priced in USD per million tokens, the standard unit across all major AI API providers. GPT-4o mini charges $0.15/M for input tokens and $0.60/M for output tokens. GPT-OSS 20B (Groq) charges $0.08/M input and $0.30/M output. If your workload is output-heavy (more tokens generated than consumed as input), the model with the lower output price compounds cost savings significantly at scale.

Prompt caching is supported by both models. For workloads with large, repeated system prompts or document context — such as RAG pipelines or multi-turn conversations with a fixed knowledge base — prompt caching can reduce effective input costs by 60–90%, which may change the cost ranking between these two models at your specific usage pattern.

Context window capacity differs between the two: GPT-OSS 20B (Groq) supports up to 131,072 tokens in a single request, versus 128,000 tokens for GPT-4o mini. A larger context window is essential for document summarization, large codebase analysis, and multi-document retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) applications.

Use the interactive calculator at the top of this page to enter your actual token usage and monthly request volume for a precise cost comparison tailored to your workload. Adjust for batch API discounts and prompt caching to find the most cost-effective option for your specific deployment.

Explore other model comparisons from the same providers or performance tiers.

Related Provider Pages

View complete pricing tables and model lineups for the providers behind these models.

Relevant Use Cases

See cost recommendations for workloads where GPT-4o mini or GPT-OSS 20B (Groq) is recommended.