Skip to main content

GPT-OSS 20B (Groq) vs Nemotron Nano 9B: API Cost Comparison

Compare the API pricing, context windows, features, and real-world cost projections for GPT-OSS 20B (Groq) (Groq) and Nemotron Nano 9B (Nvidia NIM). Use the interactive calculator below to compute your exact monthly cost based on your token usage and request volume.

Prices verified Mar 11, 2026

Interactive Cost Calculator

GroqGPT-OSS 20B (Groq)Nvidia NIMNemotron Nano 9B

Fills in typical token counts for a workload type

Tokens in each prompt sent to the model

Tokens generated in each response

Total API calls per month

Showing costs for 2 models. Cheapest: Nemotron Nano 9B at $1.20/month.

Cheapest: Nemotron Nano 9B at $1.20/mo — save 46.7% vs GPT-OSS 20B (Groq)
Alert
BestNemotron Nano 9B
Nvidia NIM$1.20$0.000120$0.40$0.8046.7%Alerts coming soon
GPT-OSS 20B (Groq)
Groq$2.25$0.000225$0.75$1.50Alerts coming soon

Monthly Cost Comparison

Price Comparison at a Glance

All prices are in USD per 1 million tokens ($/M tokens). Lower is cheaper.

Pricing TypeGPT-OSS 20B (Groq)Nemotron Nano 9BCheaper
Input (standard)$0.08/M$0.04/MNemotron Nano 9B
Output$0.30/M$0.16/MNemotron Nano 9B
Cached input$0.04/MN/A

Prices last verified: 2026-03-06 – 2026-03-11

Cost Breakdown by Usage Volume

Estimated monthly costs at different request volumes, assuming 1,000 input tokens and 500 output tokens per request. Adjust in the calculator above for your specific use case.

VolumeGPT-OSS 20B (Groq)MonthlyNemotron Nano 9BMonthlyGPT-OSS 20B (Groq)Per requestNemotron Nano 9BPer request
1K requests/mo$0.22$0.12$0.000225$0.000120
10K requests/mo$2.25$1.20$0.000225$0.000120
100K requests/mo$22.50$12.00$0.000225$0.000120
1M requests/mo$225.00$120.00$0.000225$0.000120

Green values indicate the lower-cost option at each volume tier. Cost per request is calculated at 1,000 input + 500 output tokens using standard (non-batch, non-cached) pricing.

Price History

Input price per 1M tokens

When to Choose GPT-OSS 20B (Groq)

by Groq

  • Customer support
  • Text classification
  • General chatbot

Input / 1M tokens

$0.08/M

Output / 1M tokens

$0.30/M

Context window

131,072

Tier

budget

When to Choose Nemotron Nano 9B

by Nvidia NIM

  • Customer support
  • Text classification
  • Summarization

Input / 1M tokens

$0.04/M

Output / 1M tokens

$0.16/M

Context window

128,000

Tier

budget

Key Differences Beyond Price

Cost is only one factor in choosing an AI model. Context window size, rate limits, supported features, and latency all affect whether a model fits your use case.

CapabilityGPT-OSS 20B (Groq)Nemotron Nano 9B
Context window131,072 tokens128,000 tokens
Max output tokens32,768 tokens8,192 tokens
Performance tierBudgetBudget
Vision / image inputNoNo
Function callingYesYes
JSON modeYesYes
Prompt cachingYesNo
Batch API (50% discount)NoNo
Extended reasoningNoNo
Fine-tuningNoNo
Rate limit (req/min)30Not published

GPT-OSS 20B (Groq) notes

OpenAI's open-weight MoE model on Groq hardware. Prompt caching available at 50% discount.

Nemotron Nano 9B notes

Nemotron Nano 9B on NVIDIA NIM. Ultra-low-cost compact model for high-volume tasks requiring fast, efficient inference at minimal per-token cost.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is GPT-OSS 20B (Groq) cheaper than Nemotron Nano 9B?

At standard usage (1,000 input tokens, 500 output tokens, 100,000 requests/month), Nemotron Nano 9B costs $12.00/month versus $22.50/month for GPT-OSS 20B (Groq) — a 47% saving. Your actual savings will vary based on your token profile; output-heavy workloads amplify differences in output pricing.

Which model has a larger context window, GPT-OSS 20B (Groq) or Nemotron Nano 9B?

GPT-OSS 20B (Groq) has a larger context window at 131,072 tokens, compared to 128,000 tokens for Nemotron Nano 9B. A larger context window is important for processing long documents, multi-turn conversations, or large codebases without truncation.

Do GPT-OSS 20B (Groq) and Nemotron Nano 9B support the Batch API?

Neither GPT-OSS 20B (Groq) nor Nemotron Nano 9B currently supports a batch API with discounted pricing. For batch-eligible alternatives, consider models from OpenAI, Anthropic, or Google that include batch API support.

Which model offers better prompt caching?

GPT-OSS 20B (Groq) supports prompt caching at $0.04/M for cached input, while Nemotron Nano 9B does not offer prompt caching. For RAG applications or chatbots with large, repeated context, GPT-OSS 20B (Groq)'s caching capability can substantially reduce effective costs.

What are the best use cases for GPT-OSS 20B (Groq) vs Nemotron Nano 9B?

Both models are well-suited for Customer support, Text classification. GPT-OSS 20B (Groq) is particularly strong for General chatbot. Nemotron Nano 9B is favored for Summarization. At the same quality level, the lower-cost model is usually preferable; use this page's calculator to compare total monthly spend at your volume.

What is the cost per request for GPT-OSS 20B (Groq) vs Nemotron Nano 9B?

At 1,000 input tokens and 500 output tokens per request — a typical conversational workload — GPT-OSS 20B (Groq) costs $0.000225 per request and Nemotron Nano 9B costs $0.000120 per request. At 100,000 requests/month, that translates to $22.50 and $12.00 respectively. Use the interactive calculator to adjust these parameters for your actual workload.

GPT-OSS 20B (Groq) vs Nemotron Nano 9B: Summary

When comparing GPT-OSS 20B (Groq) and Nemotron Nano 9B for API cost, the right choice depends on your workload's token profile, required features, and tolerance for latency. Nemotron Nano 9B offers lower total cost at standard usage volumes (1,000 input + 500 output tokens per request at 100,000 requests/month) at $12.00/month, compared to $22.50/month for GPT-OSS 20B (Groq).

Both models are priced in USD per million tokens, the standard unit across all major AI API providers. GPT-OSS 20B (Groq) charges $0.08/M for input tokens and $0.30/M for output tokens. Nemotron Nano 9B charges $0.04/M input and $0.16/M output. If your workload is output-heavy (more tokens generated than consumed as input), the model with the lower output price compounds cost savings significantly at scale.

Prompt caching is supported by GPT-OSS 20B (Groq) but not Nemotron Nano 9B. For workloads with large, repeated system prompts or document context — such as RAG pipelines or multi-turn conversations with a fixed knowledge base — prompt caching can reduce effective input costs by 60–90%, which may change the cost ranking between these two models at your specific usage pattern.

Context window capacity differs between the two: GPT-OSS 20B (Groq) supports up to 131,072 tokens in a single request, versus 128,000 tokens for Nemotron Nano 9B. A larger context window is essential for document summarization, large codebase analysis, and multi-document retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) applications.

Use the interactive calculator at the top of this page to enter your actual token usage and monthly request volume for a precise cost comparison tailored to your workload. Adjust for batch API discounts and prompt caching to find the most cost-effective option for your specific deployment.

Explore other model comparisons from the same providers or performance tiers.

Related Provider Pages

View complete pricing tables and model lineups for the providers behind these models.

Relevant Use Cases

See cost recommendations for workloads where GPT-OSS 20B (Groq) or Nemotron Nano 9B is recommended.