GPT-4.1 mini vs NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Ultra: API Cost Comparison
Compare the API pricing, context windows, features, and real-world cost projections for GPT-4.1 mini (OpenAI) and NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Ultra (Nvidia NIM). Use the interactive calculator below to compute your exact monthly cost based on your token usage and request volume.
Prices verified Jun 26, 2026
Interactive Cost Calculator
Fills in typical token counts for a workload type
Tokens in each prompt sent to the model
Tokens generated in each response
Total API calls per month
Showing costs for 2 models. Cheapest: GPT-4.1 mini at $12.00/month.
| Alert | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BestGPT-4.1 mini | OpenAI | $12.00 | $0.001200 | $4.00 | $8.00 | 25.0% | Alerts coming soon |
NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Ultra | Nvidia NIM | $16.00 | $0.001600 | $5.00 | $11.00 | — | Alerts coming soon |
Monthly Cost Comparison
Price Comparison at a Glance
All prices are in USD per 1 million tokens ($/M tokens). Lower is cheaper.
| Pricing Type | GPT-4.1 mini | NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Ultra | Cheaper |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input (standard) | $0.40/M | $0.50/M | GPT-4.1 mini |
| Output | $1.60/M | $2.20/M | GPT-4.1 mini |
| Cached input | $0.10/M | N/A | — |
| Batch input | $0.20/M | N/A | — |
| Batch output | $0.80/M | N/A | — |
Prices last verified: 2026-03-08 – 2026-06-26
Cost Breakdown by Usage Volume
Estimated monthly costs at different request volumes, assuming 1,000 input tokens and 500 output tokens per request. Adjust in the calculator above for your specific use case.
| Volume | GPT-4.1 miniMonthly | NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 UltraMonthly | GPT-4.1 miniPer request | NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 UltraPer request |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1K requests/mo | $1.20 | $1.60 | $0.001200 | $0.001600 |
| 10K requests/mo | $12.00 | $16.00 | $0.001200 | $0.001600 |
| 100K requests/mo | $120.00 | $160.00 | $0.001200 | $0.001600 |
| 1M requests/mo | $1,200.00 | $1,600.00 | $0.001200 | $0.001600 |
Green values indicate the lower-cost option at each volume tier. Cost per request is calculated at 1,000 input + 500 output tokens using standard (non-batch, non-cached) pricing.
Price History
Input price per 1M tokensWhen to Choose GPT-4.1 mini
by OpenAI
- Customer support
- Data extraction
- General chatbot
Input / 1M tokens
$0.40/M
Output / 1M tokens
$1.60/M
Context window
1,047,576
Tier
mid
When to Choose NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Ultra
by Nvidia NIM
- General chatbot
Input / 1M tokens
$0.50/M
Output / 1M tokens
$2.20/M
Context window
1,000,000
Tier
budget
Key Differences Beyond Price
Cost is only one factor in choosing an AI model. Context window size, rate limits, supported features, and latency all affect whether a model fits your use case.
| Capability | GPT-4.1 mini | NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Context window | 1,047,576 tokens | 1,000,000 tokens |
| Max output tokens | 32,768 tokens | 16,384 tokens |
| Performance tier | Mid | Budget |
| Vision / image input | Yes | No |
| Function calling | Yes | Yes |
| JSON mode | Yes | Yes |
| Prompt caching | Yes | No |
| Batch API (50% discount) | Yes | No |
| Extended reasoning | No | Yes |
| Fine-tuning | No | No |
| Rate limit (req/min) | 10,000 | Not published |
GPT-4.1 mini notes
Strong mid-tier option with 1M token context at competitive pricing.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GPT-4.1 mini cheaper than NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Ultra?
At standard usage (1,000 input tokens, 500 output tokens, 100,000 requests/month), GPT-4.1 mini costs $120.00/month versus $160.00/month for NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Ultra — a 25% saving. Your actual savings will vary based on your token profile; output-heavy workloads amplify differences in output pricing.
Which model has a larger context window, GPT-4.1 mini or NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Ultra?
GPT-4.1 mini has a larger context window at 1,047,576 tokens, compared to 1,000,000 tokens for NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Ultra. A larger context window is important for processing long documents, multi-turn conversations, or large codebases without truncation.
Do GPT-4.1 mini and NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Ultra support the Batch API?
GPT-4.1 mini supports the Batch API (50% discount for async processing), while NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Ultra does not. If your workload tolerates up to 24-hour latency, routing to GPT-4.1 mini with batch pricing could significantly cut costs versus NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Ultra's standard rate.
Which model offers better prompt caching?
GPT-4.1 mini supports prompt caching at $0.10/M for cached input, while NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Ultra does not offer prompt caching. For RAG applications or chatbots with large, repeated context, GPT-4.1 mini's caching capability can substantially reduce effective costs.
What are the best use cases for GPT-4.1 mini vs NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Ultra?
Both models are well-suited for General chatbot. GPT-4.1 mini is particularly strong for Customer support, Data extraction. NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Ultra is favored for similar workflows. At the same quality level, the lower-cost model is usually preferable; use this page's calculator to compare total monthly spend at your volume.
What is the cost per request for GPT-4.1 mini vs NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Ultra?
At 1,000 input tokens and 500 output tokens per request — a typical conversational workload — GPT-4.1 mini costs $0.001200 per request and NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Ultra costs $0.001600 per request. At 100,000 requests/month, that translates to $120.00 and $160.00 respectively. Use the interactive calculator to adjust these parameters for your actual workload.
GPT-4.1 mini vs NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Ultra: Summary
When comparing GPT-4.1 mini and NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Ultra for API cost, the right choice depends on your workload's token profile, required features, and tolerance for latency. GPT-4.1 mini offers lower total cost at standard usage volumes (1,000 input + 500 output tokens per request at 100,000 requests/month) at $120.00/month, compared to $160.00/month for NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Ultra.
Both models are priced in USD per million tokens, the standard unit across all major AI API providers. GPT-4.1 mini charges $0.40/M for input tokens and $1.60/M for output tokens. NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Ultra charges $0.50/M input and $2.20/M output. If your workload is output-heavy (more tokens generated than consumed as input), the model with the lower output price compounds cost savings significantly at scale.
Prompt caching is supported by GPT-4.1 mini but not NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Ultra. For workloads with large, repeated system prompts or document context — such as RAG pipelines or multi-turn conversations with a fixed knowledge base — prompt caching can reduce effective input costs by 60–90%, which may change the cost ranking between these two models at your specific usage pattern.
Context window capacity differs between the two: GPT-4.1 mini supports up to 1,047,576 tokens in a single request, versus 1,000,000 tokens for NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Ultra. A larger context window is essential for document summarization, large codebase analysis, and multi-document retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) applications.
Use the interactive calculator at the top of this page to enter your actual token usage and monthly request volume for a precise cost comparison tailored to your workload. Adjust for batch API discounts and prompt caching to find the most cost-effective option for your specific deployment.
Related Comparisons
Explore other model comparisons from the same providers or performance tiers.
Related Provider Pages
View complete pricing tables and model lineups for the providers behind these models.
Relevant Use Cases
See cost recommendations for workloads where GPT-4.1 mini or NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Ultra is recommended.