Skip to main content

GPT-4.1 mini vs GPT-5 nano: API Cost Comparison

Compare the API pricing, context windows, features, and real-world cost projections for GPT-4.1 mini (OpenAI) and GPT-5 nano (OpenAI). Use the interactive calculator below to compute your exact monthly cost based on your token usage and request volume.

Prices verified Mar 8, 2026

Interactive Cost Calculator

OpenAIGPT-4.1 miniOpenAIGPT-5 nano

Fills in typical token counts for a workload type

Tokens in each prompt sent to the model

Tokens generated in each response

Total API calls per month

Showing costs for 2 models. Cheapest: GPT-5 nano at $2.50/month.

Cheapest: GPT-5 nano at $2.50/mo — save 79.2% vs GPT-4.1 mini
Alert
BestGPT-5 nano
OpenAI$2.50$0.000250$0.50$2.0079.2%Alerts coming soon
GPT-4.1 mini
OpenAI$12.00$0.001200$4.00$8.00Alerts coming soon

Monthly Cost Comparison

Price Comparison at a Glance

All prices are in USD per 1 million tokens ($/M tokens). Lower is cheaper.

Pricing TypeGPT-4.1 miniGPT-5 nanoCheaper
Input (standard)$0.40/M$0.05/MGPT-5 nano
Output$1.60/M$0.40/MGPT-5 nano
Cached input$0.10/M$0.01/MGPT-5 nano
Batch input$0.20/MN/A
Batch output$0.80/MN/A

Prices last verified: 2026-03-06 – 2026-03-08

Cost Breakdown by Usage Volume

Estimated monthly costs at different request volumes, assuming 1,000 input tokens and 500 output tokens per request. Adjust in the calculator above for your specific use case.

VolumeGPT-4.1 miniMonthlyGPT-5 nanoMonthlyGPT-4.1 miniPer requestGPT-5 nanoPer request
1K requests/mo$1.20$0.25$0.001200$0.000250
10K requests/mo$12.00$2.50$0.001200$0.000250
100K requests/mo$120.00$25.00$0.001200$0.000250
1M requests/mo$1,200.00$250.00$0.001200$0.000250

Green values indicate the lower-cost option at each volume tier. Cost per request is calculated at 1,000 input + 500 output tokens using standard (non-batch, non-cached) pricing.

Price History

Input price per 1M tokens

When to Choose GPT-4.1 mini

by OpenAI

  • Customer support
  • Data extraction
  • General chatbot

Input / 1M tokens

$0.40/M

Output / 1M tokens

$1.60/M

Context window

1,047,576

Tier

mid

When to Choose GPT-5 nano

by OpenAI

  • Text classification
  • Data extraction

Input / 1M tokens

$0.05/M

Output / 1M tokens

$0.40/M

Context window

400,000

Tier

budget

Key Differences Beyond Price

Cost is only one factor in choosing an AI model. Context window size, rate limits, supported features, and latency all affect whether a model fits your use case.

CapabilityGPT-4.1 miniGPT-5 nano
Context window1,047,576 tokens400,000 tokens
Max output tokens32,768 tokens128,000 tokens
Performance tierMidBudget
Vision / image inputYesYes
Function callingYesYes
JSON modeYesYes
Prompt cachingYesYes
Batch API (50% discount)YesNo
Extended reasoningNoNo
Fine-tuningNoNo
Rate limit (req/min)10,00010,000

GPT-4.1 mini notes

Strong mid-tier option with 1M token context at competitive pricing.

GPT-5 nano notes

Cheapest GPT-5 model. 1M context at budget pricing.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is GPT-4.1 mini cheaper than GPT-5 nano?

At standard usage (1,000 input tokens, 500 output tokens, 100,000 requests/month), GPT-5 nano costs $25.00/month versus $120.00/month for GPT-4.1 mini — a 79% saving. Your actual savings will vary based on your token profile; output-heavy workloads amplify differences in output pricing.

Which model has a larger context window, GPT-4.1 mini or GPT-5 nano?

GPT-4.1 mini has a larger context window at 1,047,576 tokens, compared to 400,000 tokens for GPT-5 nano. A larger context window is important for processing long documents, multi-turn conversations, or large codebases without truncation.

Do GPT-4.1 mini and GPT-5 nano support the Batch API?

GPT-4.1 mini supports the Batch API (50% discount for async processing), while GPT-5 nano does not. If your workload tolerates up to 24-hour latency, routing to GPT-4.1 mini with batch pricing could significantly cut costs versus GPT-5 nano's standard rate.

Which model offers better prompt caching?

Both GPT-4.1 mini and GPT-5 nano support prompt caching. GPT-4.1 mini caches repeated input at $0.10/M (vs $0.40/M standard), while GPT-5 nano caches at $0.01/M (vs $0.05/M standard). For workloads with large, repeated system prompts or document context, caching can reduce effective input costs by 60–90%.

What are the best use cases for GPT-4.1 mini vs GPT-5 nano?

Both models are well-suited for Data extraction. GPT-4.1 mini is particularly strong for Customer support, General chatbot. GPT-5 nano is favored for Text classification. At the same quality level, the lower-cost model is usually preferable; use this page's calculator to compare total monthly spend at your volume.

What is the cost per request for GPT-4.1 mini vs GPT-5 nano?

At 1,000 input tokens and 500 output tokens per request — a typical conversational workload — GPT-4.1 mini costs $0.001200 per request and GPT-5 nano costs $0.000250 per request. At 100,000 requests/month, that translates to $120.00 and $25.00 respectively. Use the interactive calculator to adjust these parameters for your actual workload.

GPT-4.1 mini vs GPT-5 nano: Summary

When comparing GPT-4.1 mini and GPT-5 nano for API cost, the right choice depends on your workload's token profile, required features, and tolerance for latency. GPT-5 nano offers lower total cost at standard usage volumes (1,000 input + 500 output tokens per request at 100,000 requests/month) at $25.00/month, compared to $120.00/month for GPT-4.1 mini.

Both models are priced in USD per million tokens, the standard unit across all major AI API providers. GPT-4.1 mini charges $0.40/M for input tokens and $1.60/M for output tokens. GPT-5 nano charges $0.05/M input and $0.40/M output. If your workload is output-heavy (more tokens generated than consumed as input), the model with the lower output price compounds cost savings significantly at scale.

Prompt caching is supported by both models. For workloads with large, repeated system prompts or document context — such as RAG pipelines or multi-turn conversations with a fixed knowledge base — prompt caching can reduce effective input costs by 60–90%, which may change the cost ranking between these two models at your specific usage pattern.

Context window capacity differs between the two: GPT-4.1 mini supports up to 1,047,576 tokens in a single request, versus 400,000 tokens for GPT-5 nano. A larger context window is essential for document summarization, large codebase analysis, and multi-document retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) applications.

Use the interactive calculator at the top of this page to enter your actual token usage and monthly request volume for a precise cost comparison tailored to your workload. Adjust for batch API discounts and prompt caching to find the most cost-effective option for your specific deployment.

Explore other model comparisons from the same providers or performance tiers.

Related Provider Pages

View complete pricing tables and model lineups for the providers behind these models.

Relevant Use Cases

See cost recommendations for workloads where GPT-4.1 mini or GPT-5 nano is recommended.