Skip to main content

DeepSeek R1 vs Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image): API Cost Comparison

Compare the API pricing, context windows, features, and real-world cost projections for DeepSeek R1 (DeepSeek) and Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) (Google). Use the interactive calculator below to compute your exact monthly cost based on your token usage and request volume.

Prices verified Jun 26, 2026

Interactive Cost Calculator

DeepSeekDeepSeek R1GoogleNano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)

Fills in typical token counts for a workload type

Tokens in each prompt sent to the model

Tokens generated in each response

Total API calls per month

Showing costs for 2 models. Cheapest: DeepSeek R1 at $4.90/month.

Cheapest: DeepSeek R1 at $4.90/mo — save 75.5% vs Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)
Alert
BestDeepSeek R1
DeepSeek$4.90$0.000490$2.80$2.1075.5%Alerts coming soon
Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)
Google$20.00$0.002000$5.00$15.00Alerts coming soon

Monthly Cost Comparison

Price Comparison at a Glance

All prices are in USD per 1 million tokens ($/M tokens). Lower is cheaper.

Pricing TypeDeepSeek R1Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)Cheaper
Input (standard)$0.28/M$0.50/MDeepSeek R1
Output$0.42/M$3.00/MDeepSeek R1
Cached input$0.03/MN/A

Prices last verified: 2026-03-06 – 2026-06-26

Cost Breakdown by Usage Volume

Estimated monthly costs at different request volumes, assuming 1,000 input tokens and 500 output tokens per request. Adjust in the calculator above for your specific use case.

VolumeDeepSeek R1MonthlyNano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)MonthlyDeepSeek R1Per requestNano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)Per request
1K requests/mo$0.49$2.00$0.000490$0.002000
10K requests/mo$4.90$20.00$0.000490$0.002000
100K requests/mo$49.00$200.00$0.000490$0.002000
1M requests/mo$490.00$2,000.00$0.000490$0.002000

Green values indicate the lower-cost option at each volume tier. Cost per request is calculated at 1,000 input + 500 output tokens using standard (non-batch, non-cached) pricing.

Price History

Input price per 1M tokens

When to Choose DeepSeek R1

by DeepSeek

  • Code generation
  • Document summarization

Input / 1M tokens

$0.28/M

Output / 1M tokens

$0.42/M

Context window

128,000

Tier

reasoning

When to Choose Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)

by Google

  • General chatbot

Input / 1M tokens

$0.50/M

Output / 1M tokens

$3.00/M

Context window

131,072

Tier

budget

Key Differences Beyond Price

Cost is only one factor in choosing an AI model. Context window size, rate limits, supported features, and latency all affect whether a model fits your use case.

CapabilityDeepSeek R1Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)
Context window128,000 tokens131,072 tokens
Max output tokens64,000 tokens32,768 tokens
Performance tierReasoningBudget
Vision / image inputNoYes
Function callingNoNo
JSON modeYesYes
Prompt cachingYesNo
Batch API (50% discount)NoNo
Extended reasoningYesYes
Fine-tuningNoNo

DeepSeek R1 notes

V3.2 unified pricing. Open-source weights available. Off-peak discounts available.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is DeepSeek R1 cheaper than Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)?

At standard usage (1,000 input tokens, 500 output tokens, 100,000 requests/month), DeepSeek R1 costs $49.00/month versus $200.00/month for Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) — a 76% saving. Your actual savings will vary based on your token profile; output-heavy workloads amplify differences in output pricing.

Which model has a larger context window, DeepSeek R1 or Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)?

Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) has a larger context window at 131,072 tokens, compared to 128,000 tokens for DeepSeek R1. A larger context window is important for processing long documents, multi-turn conversations, or large codebases without truncation.

Do DeepSeek R1 and Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) support the Batch API?

Neither DeepSeek R1 nor Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) currently supports a batch API with discounted pricing. For batch-eligible alternatives, consider models from OpenAI, Anthropic, or Google that include batch API support.

Which model offers better prompt caching?

DeepSeek R1 supports prompt caching at $0.03/M for cached input, while Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) does not offer prompt caching. For RAG applications or chatbots with large, repeated context, DeepSeek R1's caching capability can substantially reduce effective costs.

What are the best use cases for DeepSeek R1 vs Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)?

DeepSeek R1 is best suited for Code generation, Document summarization, while Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) is optimized for General chatbot. Choose based on which use case matches your primary workload — and validate with the cost calculator above to confirm the total monthly spend fits your budget.

What is the cost per request for DeepSeek R1 vs Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)?

At 1,000 input tokens and 500 output tokens per request — a typical conversational workload — DeepSeek R1 costs $0.000490 per request and Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) costs $0.002000 per request. At 100,000 requests/month, that translates to $49.00 and $200.00 respectively. Use the interactive calculator to adjust these parameters for your actual workload.

DeepSeek R1 vs Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image): Summary

When comparing DeepSeek R1 and Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) for API cost, the right choice depends on your workload's token profile, required features, and tolerance for latency. DeepSeek R1 offers lower total cost at standard usage volumes (1,000 input + 500 output tokens per request at 100,000 requests/month) at $49.00/month, compared to $200.00/month for Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image).

Both models are priced in USD per million tokens, the standard unit across all major AI API providers. DeepSeek R1 charges $0.28/M for input tokens and $0.42/M for output tokens. Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) charges $0.50/M input and $3.00/M output. If your workload is output-heavy (more tokens generated than consumed as input), the model with the lower output price compounds cost savings significantly at scale.

Prompt caching is supported by DeepSeek R1 but not Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image). For workloads with large, repeated system prompts or document context — such as RAG pipelines or multi-turn conversations with a fixed knowledge base — prompt caching can reduce effective input costs by 60–90%, which may change the cost ranking between these two models at your specific usage pattern.

Context window capacity differs between the two: Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) supports up to 131,072 tokens in a single request, versus 128,000 tokens for DeepSeek R1. A larger context window is essential for document summarization, large codebase analysis, and multi-document retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) applications.

Use the interactive calculator at the top of this page to enter your actual token usage and monthly request volume for a precise cost comparison tailored to your workload. Adjust for batch API discounts and prompt caching to find the most cost-effective option for your specific deployment.

Explore other model comparisons from the same providers or performance tiers.

Related Provider Pages

View complete pricing tables and model lineups for the providers behind these models.

Relevant Use Cases

See cost recommendations for workloads where DeepSeek R1 or Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) is recommended.