Skip to main content

DeepSeek R1 vs o4-mini: API Cost Comparison

Compare the API pricing, context windows, features, and real-world cost projections for DeepSeek R1 (DeepSeek) and o4-mini (OpenAI). Use the interactive calculator below to compute your exact monthly cost based on your token usage and request volume.

Prices verified Mar 8, 2026

Interactive Cost Calculator

DeepSeekDeepSeek R1OpenAIo4-mini

Fills in typical token counts for a workload type

Tokens in each prompt sent to the model

Tokens generated in each response

Total API calls per month

Showing costs for 2 models. Cheapest: DeepSeek R1 at $4.90/month.

Cheapest: DeepSeek R1 at $4.90/mo — save 85.2% vs o4-mini
Alert
BestDeepSeek R1
DeepSeek$4.90$0.000490$2.80$2.1085.2%Alerts coming soon
o4-mini
OpenAI$33.00$0.003300$11.00$22.00Alerts coming soon

Monthly Cost Comparison

Price Comparison at a Glance

All prices are in USD per 1 million tokens ($/M tokens). Lower is cheaper.

Pricing TypeDeepSeek R1o4-miniCheaper
Input (standard)$0.28/M$1.10/MDeepSeek R1
Output$0.42/M$4.40/MDeepSeek R1
Cached input$0.03/M$0.28/MDeepSeek R1
Batch inputN/A$0.55/M
Batch outputN/A$2.20/M

Prices last verified: 2026-03-06 – 2026-03-08

Cost Breakdown by Usage Volume

Estimated monthly costs at different request volumes, assuming 1,000 input tokens and 500 output tokens per request. Adjust in the calculator above for your specific use case.

VolumeDeepSeek R1Monthlyo4-miniMonthlyDeepSeek R1Per requesto4-miniPer request
1K requests/mo$0.49$3.30$0.000490$0.003300
10K requests/mo$4.90$33.00$0.000490$0.003300
100K requests/mo$49.00$330.00$0.000490$0.003300
1M requests/mo$490.00$3,300.00$0.000490$0.003300

Green values indicate the lower-cost option at each volume tier. Cost per request is calculated at 1,000 input + 500 output tokens using standard (non-batch, non-cached) pricing.

Price History

Input price per 1M tokens

When to Choose DeepSeek R1

by DeepSeek

  • Code generation
  • Document summarization

Input / 1M tokens

$0.28/M

Output / 1M tokens

$0.42/M

Context window

128,000

Tier

reasoning

When to Choose o4-mini

by OpenAI

  • Code generation
  • Data extraction

Input / 1M tokens

$1.10/M

Output / 1M tokens

$4.40/M

Context window

200,000

Tier

reasoning

Key Differences Beyond Price

Cost is only one factor in choosing an AI model. Context window size, rate limits, supported features, and latency all affect whether a model fits your use case.

CapabilityDeepSeek R1o4-mini
Context window128,000 tokens200,000 tokens
Max output tokens64,000 tokens100,000 tokens
Performance tierReasoningReasoning
Vision / image inputNoYes
Function callingNoYes
JSON modeYesYes
Prompt cachingYesYes
Batch API (50% discount)NoYes
Extended reasoningYesYes
Fine-tuningNoNo
Rate limit (req/min)Not published1,000

DeepSeek R1 notes

V3.2 unified pricing. Open-source weights available. Off-peak discounts available.

o4-mini notes

Configurable reasoning effort. Best budget reasoning model from OpenAI.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is DeepSeek R1 cheaper than o4-mini?

At standard usage (1,000 input tokens, 500 output tokens, 100,000 requests/month), DeepSeek R1 costs $49.00/month versus $330.00/month for o4-mini — a 85% saving. Your actual savings will vary based on your token profile; output-heavy workloads amplify differences in output pricing.

Which model has a larger context window, DeepSeek R1 or o4-mini?

o4-mini has a larger context window at 200,000 tokens, compared to 128,000 tokens for DeepSeek R1. A larger context window is important for processing long documents, multi-turn conversations, or large codebases without truncation.

Do DeepSeek R1 and o4-mini support the Batch API?

o4-mini supports the Batch API (50% discount for async processing), while DeepSeek R1 does not. If your workload tolerates up to 24-hour latency, routing to o4-mini with batch pricing could significantly cut costs versus DeepSeek R1's standard rate.

Which model offers better prompt caching?

Both DeepSeek R1 and o4-mini support prompt caching. DeepSeek R1 caches repeated input at $0.03/M (vs $0.28/M standard), while o4-mini caches at $0.28/M (vs $1.10/M standard). For workloads with large, repeated system prompts or document context, caching can reduce effective input costs by 60–90%.

What are the best use cases for DeepSeek R1 vs o4-mini?

Both models are well-suited for Code generation. DeepSeek R1 is particularly strong for Document summarization. o4-mini is favored for Data extraction. At the same quality level, the lower-cost model is usually preferable; use this page's calculator to compare total monthly spend at your volume.

What is the cost per request for DeepSeek R1 vs o4-mini?

At 1,000 input tokens and 500 output tokens per request — a typical conversational workload — DeepSeek R1 costs $0.000490 per request and o4-mini costs $0.003300 per request. At 100,000 requests/month, that translates to $49.00 and $330.00 respectively. Use the interactive calculator to adjust these parameters for your actual workload.

DeepSeek R1 vs o4-mini: Summary

When comparing DeepSeek R1 and o4-mini for API cost, the right choice depends on your workload's token profile, required features, and tolerance for latency. DeepSeek R1 offers lower total cost at standard usage volumes (1,000 input + 500 output tokens per request at 100,000 requests/month) at $49.00/month, compared to $330.00/month for o4-mini.

Both models are priced in USD per million tokens, the standard unit across all major AI API providers. DeepSeek R1 charges $0.28/M for input tokens and $0.42/M for output tokens. o4-mini charges $1.10/M input and $4.40/M output. If your workload is output-heavy (more tokens generated than consumed as input), the model with the lower output price compounds cost savings significantly at scale.

Prompt caching is supported by both models. For workloads with large, repeated system prompts or document context — such as RAG pipelines or multi-turn conversations with a fixed knowledge base — prompt caching can reduce effective input costs by 60–90%, which may change the cost ranking between these two models at your specific usage pattern.

Context window capacity differs between the two: o4-mini supports up to 200,000 tokens in a single request, versus 128,000 tokens for DeepSeek R1. A larger context window is essential for document summarization, large codebase analysis, and multi-document retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) applications.

Use the interactive calculator at the top of this page to enter your actual token usage and monthly request volume for a precise cost comparison tailored to your workload. Adjust for batch API discounts and prompt caching to find the most cost-effective option for your specific deployment.

Explore other model comparisons from the same providers or performance tiers.

Related Provider Pages

View complete pricing tables and model lineups for the providers behind these models.

Relevant Use Cases

See cost recommendations for workloads where DeepSeek R1 or o4-mini is recommended.