Skip to main content

DeepSeek R1 vs Inception Mercury 2 (OpenRouter): API Cost Comparison

Compare the API pricing, context windows, features, and real-world cost projections for DeepSeek R1 (DeepSeek) and Inception Mercury 2 (OpenRouter) (OpenRouter). Use the interactive calculator below to compute your exact monthly cost based on your token usage and request volume.

Prices verified Mar 10, 2026

Interactive Cost Calculator

DeepSeekDeepSeek R1OpenRouterInception Mercury 2 (OpenRouter)

Fills in typical token counts for a workload type

Tokens in each prompt sent to the model

Tokens generated in each response

Total API calls per month

Showing costs for 2 models. Cheapest: DeepSeek R1 at $4.90/month.

Cheapest: DeepSeek R1 at $4.90/mo — save 21.6% vs Inception Mercury 2 (OpenRouter)
Alert
BestDeepSeek R1
DeepSeek$4.90$0.000490$2.80$2.1021.6%Alerts coming soon
Inception Mercury 2 (OpenRouter)
OpenRouter$6.25$0.000625$2.50$3.75Alerts coming soon

Monthly Cost Comparison

Price Comparison at a Glance

All prices are in USD per 1 million tokens ($/M tokens). Lower is cheaper.

Pricing TypeDeepSeek R1Inception Mercury 2 (OpenRouter)Cheaper
Input (standard)$0.28/M$0.25/MInception Mercury 2 (OpenRouter)
Output$0.42/M$0.75/MDeepSeek R1
Cached input$0.03/MN/A

Prices last verified: 2026-03-06 – 2026-03-10

Cost Breakdown by Usage Volume

Estimated monthly costs at different request volumes, assuming 1,000 input tokens and 500 output tokens per request. Adjust in the calculator above for your specific use case.

VolumeDeepSeek R1MonthlyInception Mercury 2 (OpenRouter)MonthlyDeepSeek R1Per requestInception Mercury 2 (OpenRouter)Per request
1K requests/mo$0.49$0.62$0.000490$0.000625
10K requests/mo$4.90$6.25$0.000490$0.000625
100K requests/mo$49.00$62.50$0.000490$0.000625
1M requests/mo$490.00$625.00$0.000490$0.000625

Green values indicate the lower-cost option at each volume tier. Cost per request is calculated at 1,000 input + 500 output tokens using standard (non-batch, non-cached) pricing.

Price History

Input price per 1M tokens

When to Choose DeepSeek R1

by DeepSeek

  • Code generation
  • Document summarization

Input / 1M tokens

$0.28/M

Output / 1M tokens

$0.42/M

Context window

128,000

Tier

reasoning

When to Choose Inception Mercury 2 (OpenRouter)

by OpenRouter

  • Document summarization
  • General chatbot

Input / 1M tokens

$0.25/M

Output / 1M tokens

$0.75/M

Context window

128,000

Tier

budget

Key Differences Beyond Price

Cost is only one factor in choosing an AI model. Context window size, rate limits, supported features, and latency all affect whether a model fits your use case.

CapabilityDeepSeek R1Inception Mercury 2 (OpenRouter)
Context window128,000 tokens128,000 tokens
Max output tokens64,000 tokens50,000 tokens
Performance tierReasoningBudget
Vision / image inputNoNo
Function callingNoNo
JSON modeYesNo
Prompt cachingYesNo
Batch API (50% discount)NoNo
Extended reasoningYesNo
Fine-tuningNoNo

DeepSeek R1 notes

V3.2 unified pricing. Open-source weights available. Off-peak discounts available.

Inception Mercury 2 (OpenRouter) notes

OpenRouter offers 200+ models — showing top 15 unique models not available from other listed providers. Prices include OpenRouter markup.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is DeepSeek R1 cheaper than Inception Mercury 2 (OpenRouter)?

At standard usage (1,000 input tokens, 500 output tokens, 100,000 requests/month), DeepSeek R1 costs $49.00/month versus $62.50/month for Inception Mercury 2 (OpenRouter) — a 22% saving. Your actual savings will vary based on your token profile; output-heavy workloads amplify differences in output pricing.

Which model has a larger context window, DeepSeek R1 or Inception Mercury 2 (OpenRouter)?

Both DeepSeek R1 and Inception Mercury 2 (OpenRouter) have the same context window: 128,000 tokens.

Do DeepSeek R1 and Inception Mercury 2 (OpenRouter) support the Batch API?

Neither DeepSeek R1 nor Inception Mercury 2 (OpenRouter) currently supports a batch API with discounted pricing. For batch-eligible alternatives, consider models from OpenAI, Anthropic, or Google that include batch API support.

Which model offers better prompt caching?

DeepSeek R1 supports prompt caching at $0.03/M for cached input, while Inception Mercury 2 (OpenRouter) does not offer prompt caching. For RAG applications or chatbots with large, repeated context, DeepSeek R1's caching capability can substantially reduce effective costs.

What are the best use cases for DeepSeek R1 vs Inception Mercury 2 (OpenRouter)?

Both models are well-suited for Document summarization. DeepSeek R1 is particularly strong for Code generation. Inception Mercury 2 (OpenRouter) is favored for General chatbot. At the same quality level, the lower-cost model is usually preferable; use this page's calculator to compare total monthly spend at your volume.

What is the cost per request for DeepSeek R1 vs Inception Mercury 2 (OpenRouter)?

At 1,000 input tokens and 500 output tokens per request — a typical conversational workload — DeepSeek R1 costs $0.000490 per request and Inception Mercury 2 (OpenRouter) costs $0.000625 per request. At 100,000 requests/month, that translates to $49.00 and $62.50 respectively. Use the interactive calculator to adjust these parameters for your actual workload.

DeepSeek R1 vs Inception Mercury 2 (OpenRouter): Summary

When comparing DeepSeek R1 and Inception Mercury 2 (OpenRouter) for API cost, the right choice depends on your workload's token profile, required features, and tolerance for latency. DeepSeek R1 offers lower total cost at standard usage volumes (1,000 input + 500 output tokens per request at 100,000 requests/month) at $49.00/month, compared to $62.50/month for Inception Mercury 2 (OpenRouter).

Both models are priced in USD per million tokens, the standard unit across all major AI API providers. DeepSeek R1 charges $0.28/M for input tokens and $0.42/M for output tokens. Inception Mercury 2 (OpenRouter) charges $0.25/M input and $0.75/M output. If your workload is output-heavy (more tokens generated than consumed as input), the model with the lower output price compounds cost savings significantly at scale.

Prompt caching is supported by DeepSeek R1 but not Inception Mercury 2 (OpenRouter). For workloads with large, repeated system prompts or document context — such as RAG pipelines or multi-turn conversations with a fixed knowledge base — prompt caching can reduce effective input costs by 60–90%, which may change the cost ranking between these two models at your specific usage pattern.

Context window capacity differs between the two: Both models support 128,000 tokens per request. A larger context window is essential for document summarization, large codebase analysis, and multi-document retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) applications.

Use the interactive calculator at the top of this page to enter your actual token usage and monthly request volume for a precise cost comparison tailored to your workload. Adjust for batch API discounts and prompt caching to find the most cost-effective option for your specific deployment.

Explore other model comparisons from the same providers or performance tiers.

Related Provider Pages

View complete pricing tables and model lineups for the providers behind these models.

Relevant Use Cases

See cost recommendations for workloads where DeepSeek R1 or Inception Mercury 2 (OpenRouter) is recommended.