Skip to main content

Llama 3.3 70B (Together AI) vs Llama 4 Scout (Fireworks): API Cost Comparison

Compare the API pricing, context windows, features, and real-world cost projections for Llama 3.3 70B (Together AI) (Together AI) and Llama 4 Scout (Fireworks) (Fireworks AI). Use the interactive calculator below to compute your exact monthly cost based on your token usage and request volume.

Prices verified Mar 10, 2026

Interactive Cost Calculator

Together AILlama 3.3 70B (Together AI)Fireworks AILlama 4 Scout (Fireworks)

Fills in typical token counts for a workload type

Tokens in each prompt sent to the model

Tokens generated in each response

Total API calls per month

Showing costs for 2 models. Cheapest: Llama 4 Scout (Fireworks) at $3.00/month.

Cheapest: Llama 4 Scout (Fireworks) at $3.00/mo — save 77.3% vs Llama 3.3 70B (Together AI)
Alert
BestLlama 4 Scout (Fireworks)
Fireworks AI$3.00$0.000300$2.00$1.0077.3%Alerts coming soon
Llama 3.3 70B (Together AI)
Together AI$13.20$0.001320$8.80$4.40Alerts coming soon

Monthly Cost Comparison

Price Comparison at a Glance

All prices are in USD per 1 million tokens ($/M tokens). Lower is cheaper.

Pricing TypeLlama 3.3 70B (Together AI)Llama 4 Scout (Fireworks)Cheaper
Input (standard)$0.88/M$0.20/MLlama 4 Scout (Fireworks)
Output$0.88/M$0.20/MLlama 4 Scout (Fireworks)
Cached inputN/A$0.10/M
Batch inputN/A$0.10/M
Batch outputN/A$0.10/M

Prices last verified: 2026-03-06 – 2026-03-10

Cost Breakdown by Usage Volume

Estimated monthly costs at different request volumes, assuming 1,000 input tokens and 500 output tokens per request. Adjust in the calculator above for your specific use case.

VolumeLlama 3.3 70B (Together AI)MonthlyLlama 4 Scout (Fireworks)MonthlyLlama 3.3 70B (Together AI)Per requestLlama 4 Scout (Fireworks)Per request
1K requests/mo$1.32$0.30$0.001320$0.000300
10K requests/mo$13.20$3.00$0.001320$0.000300
100K requests/mo$132.00$30.00$0.001320$0.000300
1M requests/mo$1,320.00$300.00$0.001320$0.000300

Green values indicate the lower-cost option at each volume tier. Cost per request is calculated at 1,000 input + 500 output tokens using standard (non-batch, non-cached) pricing.

Price History

Input price per 1M tokens

When to Choose Llama 3.3 70B (Together AI)

by Together AI

  • General chatbot
  • Content & copywriting
  • Code generation

Input / 1M tokens

$0.88/M

Output / 1M tokens

$0.88/M

Context window

131,072

Tier

mid

When to Choose Llama 4 Scout (Fireworks)

by Fireworks AI

  • Customer support
  • RAG / Semantic search
  • General chatbot

Input / 1M tokens

$0.20/M

Output / 1M tokens

$0.20/M

Context window

10,000,000

Tier

budget

Key Differences Beyond Price

Cost is only one factor in choosing an AI model. Context window size, rate limits, supported features, and latency all affect whether a model fits your use case.

CapabilityLlama 3.3 70B (Together AI)Llama 4 Scout (Fireworks)
Context window131,072 tokens10,000,000 tokens
Max output tokens4,096 tokens16,384 tokens
Performance tierMidBudget
Vision / image inputNoYes
Function callingYesYes
JSON modeYesYes
Prompt cachingNoYes
Batch API (50% discount)NoYes
Extended reasoningNoNo
Fine-tuningNoNo

Llama 3.3 70B (Together AI) notes

Open-source Llama model. Pricing equal for input and output. Meta license applies.

Llama 4 Scout (Fireworks) notes

Fireworks serverless pricing. Cached input 50% discount. Batch inference at 50% of serverless rates. 10M context window.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Llama 3.3 70B (Together AI) cheaper than Llama 4 Scout (Fireworks)?

At standard usage (1,000 input tokens, 500 output tokens, 100,000 requests/month), Llama 4 Scout (Fireworks) costs $30.00/month versus $132.00/month for Llama 3.3 70B (Together AI) — a 77% saving. Your actual savings will vary based on your token profile; output-heavy workloads amplify differences in output pricing.

Which model has a larger context window, Llama 3.3 70B (Together AI) or Llama 4 Scout (Fireworks)?

Llama 4 Scout (Fireworks) has a larger context window at 10,000,000 tokens, compared to 131,072 tokens for Llama 3.3 70B (Together AI). A larger context window is important for processing long documents, multi-turn conversations, or large codebases without truncation.

Do Llama 3.3 70B (Together AI) and Llama 4 Scout (Fireworks) support the Batch API?

Llama 4 Scout (Fireworks) supports the Batch API (50% discount for async processing), while Llama 3.3 70B (Together AI) does not. If your workload tolerates up to 24-hour latency, routing to Llama 4 Scout (Fireworks) with batch pricing could significantly cut costs versus Llama 3.3 70B (Together AI)'s standard rate.

Which model offers better prompt caching?

Llama 4 Scout (Fireworks) supports prompt caching at $0.10/M for cached input, while Llama 3.3 70B (Together AI) does not offer prompt caching. For RAG applications or chatbots with large, repeated context, Llama 4 Scout (Fireworks)'s caching capability can substantially reduce effective costs.

What are the best use cases for Llama 3.3 70B (Together AI) vs Llama 4 Scout (Fireworks)?

Both models are well-suited for General chatbot. Llama 3.3 70B (Together AI) is particularly strong for Content & copywriting, Code generation. Llama 4 Scout (Fireworks) is favored for Customer support, RAG / Semantic search. At the same quality level, the lower-cost model is usually preferable; use this page's calculator to compare total monthly spend at your volume.

What is the cost per request for Llama 3.3 70B (Together AI) vs Llama 4 Scout (Fireworks)?

At 1,000 input tokens and 500 output tokens per request — a typical conversational workload — Llama 3.3 70B (Together AI) costs $0.001320 per request and Llama 4 Scout (Fireworks) costs $0.000300 per request. At 100,000 requests/month, that translates to $132.00 and $30.00 respectively. Use the interactive calculator to adjust these parameters for your actual workload.

Llama 3.3 70B (Together AI) vs Llama 4 Scout (Fireworks): Summary

When comparing Llama 3.3 70B (Together AI) and Llama 4 Scout (Fireworks) for API cost, the right choice depends on your workload's token profile, required features, and tolerance for latency. Llama 4 Scout (Fireworks) offers lower total cost at standard usage volumes (1,000 input + 500 output tokens per request at 100,000 requests/month) at $30.00/month, compared to $132.00/month for Llama 3.3 70B (Together AI).

Both models are priced in USD per million tokens, the standard unit across all major AI API providers. Llama 3.3 70B (Together AI) charges $0.88/M for input tokens and $0.88/M for output tokens. Llama 4 Scout (Fireworks) charges $0.20/M input and $0.20/M output. If your workload is output-heavy (more tokens generated than consumed as input), the model with the lower output price compounds cost savings significantly at scale.

Prompt caching is supported by Llama 4 Scout (Fireworks) but not Llama 3.3 70B (Together AI). For workloads with large, repeated system prompts or document context — such as RAG pipelines or multi-turn conversations with a fixed knowledge base — prompt caching can reduce effective input costs by 60–90%, which may change the cost ranking between these two models at your specific usage pattern.

Context window capacity differs between the two: Llama 4 Scout (Fireworks) supports up to 10,000,000 tokens in a single request, versus 131,072 tokens for Llama 3.3 70B (Together AI). A larger context window is essential for document summarization, large codebase analysis, and multi-document retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) applications.

Use the interactive calculator at the top of this page to enter your actual token usage and monthly request volume for a precise cost comparison tailored to your workload. Adjust for batch API discounts and prompt caching to find the most cost-effective option for your specific deployment.

Explore other model comparisons from the same providers or performance tiers.

Related Provider Pages

View complete pricing tables and model lineups for the providers behind these models.

Relevant Use Cases

See cost recommendations for workloads where Llama 3.3 70B (Together AI) or Llama 4 Scout (Fireworks) is recommended.