Skip to main content

Llama 3.1 8B (SambaNova) vs Mistral Small 3.2: API Cost Comparison

Compare the API pricing, context windows, features, and real-world cost projections for Llama 3.1 8B (SambaNova) (SambaNova) and Mistral Small 3.2 (Mistral AI). Use the interactive calculator below to compute your exact monthly cost based on your token usage and request volume.

Prices verified Apr 30, 2026

Interactive Cost Calculator

SambaNovaLlama 3.1 8B (SambaNova)Mistral AIMistral Small 3.2

Fills in typical token counts for a workload type

Tokens in each prompt sent to the model

Tokens generated in each response

Total API calls per month

Showing costs for 2 models. Cheapest: Llama 3.1 8B (SambaNova) at $2.00/month.

Cheapest: Llama 3.1 8B (SambaNova) at $2.00/mo — save 20.0% vs Mistral Small 3.2
Alert
BestLlama 3.1 8B (SambaNova)
SambaNova$2.00$0.000200$1.00$1.0020.0%Alerts coming soon
Mistral Small 3.2
Mistral AI$2.50$0.000250$1.00$1.50Alerts coming soon

Monthly Cost Comparison

Price Comparison at a Glance

All prices are in USD per 1 million tokens ($/M tokens). Lower is cheaper.

Pricing TypeLlama 3.1 8B (SambaNova)Mistral Small 3.2Cheaper
Input (standard)$0.10/M$0.10/M
Output$0.20/M$0.30/MLlama 3.1 8B (SambaNova)

Prices last verified: 2026-03-11 – 2026-04-30

Cost Breakdown by Usage Volume

Estimated monthly costs at different request volumes, assuming 1,000 input tokens and 500 output tokens per request. Adjust in the calculator above for your specific use case.

VolumeLlama 3.1 8B (SambaNova)MonthlyMistral Small 3.2MonthlyLlama 3.1 8B (SambaNova)Per requestMistral Small 3.2Per request
1K requests/mo$0.20$0.25$0.000200$0.000250
10K requests/mo$2.00$2.50$0.000200$0.000250
100K requests/mo$20.00$25.00$0.000200$0.000250
1M requests/mo$200.00$250.00$0.000200$0.000250

Green values indicate the lower-cost option at each volume tier. Cost per request is calculated at 1,000 input + 500 output tokens using standard (non-batch, non-cached) pricing.

Price History

Input price per 1M tokens

When to Choose Llama 3.1 8B (SambaNova)

by SambaNova

  • Text classification
  • Data extraction
  • Customer support

Input / 1M tokens

$0.10/M

Output / 1M tokens

$0.20/M

Context window

128,000

Tier

budget

When to Choose Mistral Small 3.2

by Mistral AI

  • Text classification
  • Data extraction
  • Customer support

Input / 1M tokens

$0.10/M

Output / 1M tokens

$0.30/M

Context window

32,768

Tier

budget

Key Differences Beyond Price

Cost is only one factor in choosing an AI model. Context window size, rate limits, supported features, and latency all affect whether a model fits your use case.

CapabilityLlama 3.1 8B (SambaNova)Mistral Small 3.2
Context window128,000 tokens32,768 tokens
Max output tokens8,192 tokens4,096 tokens
Performance tierBudgetBudget
Vision / image inputNoNo
Function callingYesYes
JSON modeYesYes
Prompt cachingNoNo
Batch API (50% discount)NoNo
Extended reasoningNoNo
Fine-tuningNoYes

Llama 3.1 8B (SambaNova) notes

Llama 3.1 8B on SambaNova. Best-in-class throughput for budget workloads. Ideal for high-volume, low-latency inference tasks.

Mistral Small 3.2 notes

Supports fine-tuning. Good for specialized classification tasks.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Llama 3.1 8B (SambaNova) cheaper than Mistral Small 3.2?

At standard usage (1,000 input tokens, 500 output tokens, 100,000 requests/month), Llama 3.1 8B (SambaNova) costs $20.00/month versus $25.00/month for Mistral Small 3.2 — a 20% saving. Your actual savings will vary based on your token profile; output-heavy workloads amplify differences in output pricing.

Which model has a larger context window, Llama 3.1 8B (SambaNova) or Mistral Small 3.2?

Llama 3.1 8B (SambaNova) has a larger context window at 128,000 tokens, compared to 32,768 tokens for Mistral Small 3.2. A larger context window is important for processing long documents, multi-turn conversations, or large codebases without truncation.

Do Llama 3.1 8B (SambaNova) and Mistral Small 3.2 support the Batch API?

Neither Llama 3.1 8B (SambaNova) nor Mistral Small 3.2 currently supports a batch API with discounted pricing. For batch-eligible alternatives, consider models from OpenAI, Anthropic, or Google that include batch API support.

Which model offers better prompt caching?

Neither Llama 3.1 8B (SambaNova) nor Mistral Small 3.2 currently supports prompt caching. For prompt-caching capable alternatives, consider Claude models from Anthropic or GPT-4o from OpenAI.

What are the best use cases for Llama 3.1 8B (SambaNova) vs Mistral Small 3.2?

Both models are well-suited for Text classification, Data extraction, Customer support. Llama 3.1 8B (SambaNova) is particularly strong for overlapping tasks. Mistral Small 3.2 is favored for similar workflows. At the same quality level, the lower-cost model is usually preferable; use this page's calculator to compare total monthly spend at your volume.

What is the cost per request for Llama 3.1 8B (SambaNova) vs Mistral Small 3.2?

At 1,000 input tokens and 500 output tokens per request — a typical conversational workload — Llama 3.1 8B (SambaNova) costs $0.000200 per request and Mistral Small 3.2 costs $0.000250 per request. At 100,000 requests/month, that translates to $20.00 and $25.00 respectively. Use the interactive calculator to adjust these parameters for your actual workload.

Llama 3.1 8B (SambaNova) vs Mistral Small 3.2: Summary

When comparing Llama 3.1 8B (SambaNova) and Mistral Small 3.2 for API cost, the right choice depends on your workload's token profile, required features, and tolerance for latency. Llama 3.1 8B (SambaNova) offers lower total cost at standard usage volumes (1,000 input + 500 output tokens per request at 100,000 requests/month) at $20.00/month, compared to $25.00/month for Mistral Small 3.2.

Both models are priced in USD per million tokens, the standard unit across all major AI API providers. Llama 3.1 8B (SambaNova) charges $0.10/M for input tokens and $0.20/M for output tokens. Mistral Small 3.2 charges $0.10/M input and $0.30/M output. If your workload is output-heavy (more tokens generated than consumed as input), the model with the lower output price compounds cost savings significantly at scale.

Context window capacity differs between the two: Llama 3.1 8B (SambaNova) supports up to 128,000 tokens in a single request, versus 32,768 tokens for Mistral Small 3.2. A larger context window is essential for document summarization, large codebase analysis, and multi-document retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) applications.

Use the interactive calculator at the top of this page to enter your actual token usage and monthly request volume for a precise cost comparison tailored to your workload. Adjust for batch API discounts and prompt caching to find the most cost-effective option for your specific deployment.

Explore other model comparisons from the same providers or performance tiers.

Related Provider Pages

View complete pricing tables and model lineups for the providers behind these models.

Relevant Use Cases

See cost recommendations for workloads where Llama 3.1 8B (SambaNova) or Mistral Small 3.2 is recommended.