Skip to main content

Kimi K2 (Groq) vs Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image): API Cost Comparison

Compare the API pricing, context windows, features, and real-world cost projections for Kimi K2 (Groq) (Groq) and Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) (Google). Use the interactive calculator below to compute your exact monthly cost based on your token usage and request volume.

Prices verified Jun 26, 2026

Interactive Cost Calculator

GroqKimi K2 (Groq)GoogleNano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)

Fills in typical token counts for a workload type

Tokens in each prompt sent to the model

Tokens generated in each response

Total API calls per month

Showing costs for 2 models. Cheapest: Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) at $20.00/month.

Cheapest: Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) at $20.00/mo — save 20.0% vs Kimi K2 (Groq)
Alert
BestNano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)
Google$20.00$0.002000$5.00$15.0020.0%Alerts coming soon
Kimi K2 (Groq)
Groq$25.00$0.002500$10.00$15.00Alerts coming soon

Monthly Cost Comparison

Price Comparison at a Glance

All prices are in USD per 1 million tokens ($/M tokens). Lower is cheaper.

Pricing TypeKimi K2 (Groq)Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)Cheaper
Input (standard)$1.00/M$0.50/MNano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)
Output$3.00/M$3.00/M

Prices last verified: 2026-03-06 – 2026-06-26

Cost Breakdown by Usage Volume

Estimated monthly costs at different request volumes, assuming 1,000 input tokens and 500 output tokens per request. Adjust in the calculator above for your specific use case.

VolumeKimi K2 (Groq)MonthlyNano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)MonthlyKimi K2 (Groq)Per requestNano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)Per request
1K requests/mo$2.50$2.00$0.002500$0.002000
10K requests/mo$25.00$20.00$0.002500$0.002000
100K requests/mo$250.00$200.00$0.002500$0.002000
1M requests/mo$2,500.00$2,000.00$0.002500$0.002000

Green values indicate the lower-cost option at each volume tier. Cost per request is calculated at 1,000 input + 500 output tokens using standard (non-batch, non-cached) pricing.

Price History

Input price per 1M tokens

When to Choose Kimi K2 (Groq)

by Groq

  • Code generation
  • RAG / Semantic search

Input / 1M tokens

$1.00/M

Output / 1M tokens

$3.00/M

Context window

256,000

Tier

premium

When to Choose Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)

by Google

  • General chatbot

Input / 1M tokens

$0.50/M

Output / 1M tokens

$3.00/M

Context window

131,072

Tier

budget

Key Differences Beyond Price

Cost is only one factor in choosing an AI model. Context window size, rate limits, supported features, and latency all affect whether a model fits your use case.

CapabilityKimi K2 (Groq)Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)
Context window256,000 tokens131,072 tokens
Max output tokens32,768 tokens32,768 tokens
Performance tierPremiumBudget
Vision / image inputNoYes
Function callingYesNo
JSON modeYesYes
Prompt cachingNoNo
Batch API (50% discount)NoNo
Extended reasoningNoYes
Fine-tuningNoNo
Rate limit (req/min)30Not published

Kimi K2 (Groq) notes

Moonshot AI's flagship model on Groq hardware.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Kimi K2 (Groq) cheaper than Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)?

At standard usage (1,000 input tokens, 500 output tokens, 100,000 requests/month), Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) costs $200.00/month versus $250.00/month for Kimi K2 (Groq) — a 20% saving. Your actual savings will vary based on your token profile; output-heavy workloads amplify differences in output pricing.

Which model has a larger context window, Kimi K2 (Groq) or Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)?

Kimi K2 (Groq) has a larger context window at 256,000 tokens, compared to 131,072 tokens for Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image). A larger context window is important for processing long documents, multi-turn conversations, or large codebases without truncation.

Do Kimi K2 (Groq) and Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) support the Batch API?

Neither Kimi K2 (Groq) nor Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) currently supports a batch API with discounted pricing. For batch-eligible alternatives, consider models from OpenAI, Anthropic, or Google that include batch API support.

Which model offers better prompt caching?

Neither Kimi K2 (Groq) nor Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) currently supports prompt caching. For prompt-caching capable alternatives, consider Claude models from Anthropic or GPT-4o from OpenAI.

What are the best use cases for Kimi K2 (Groq) vs Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)?

Kimi K2 (Groq) is best suited for Code generation, RAG / Semantic search, while Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) is optimized for General chatbot. Choose based on which use case matches your primary workload — and validate with the cost calculator above to confirm the total monthly spend fits your budget.

What is the cost per request for Kimi K2 (Groq) vs Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)?

At 1,000 input tokens and 500 output tokens per request — a typical conversational workload — Kimi K2 (Groq) costs $0.002500 per request and Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) costs $0.002000 per request. At 100,000 requests/month, that translates to $250.00 and $200.00 respectively. Use the interactive calculator to adjust these parameters for your actual workload.

Kimi K2 (Groq) vs Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image): Summary

When comparing Kimi K2 (Groq) and Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) for API cost, the right choice depends on your workload's token profile, required features, and tolerance for latency. Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) offers lower total cost at standard usage volumes (1,000 input + 500 output tokens per request at 100,000 requests/month) at $200.00/month, compared to $250.00/month for Kimi K2 (Groq).

Both models are priced in USD per million tokens, the standard unit across all major AI API providers. Kimi K2 (Groq) charges $1.00/M for input tokens and $3.00/M for output tokens. Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) charges $0.50/M input and $3.00/M output. If your workload is output-heavy (more tokens generated than consumed as input), the model with the lower output price compounds cost savings significantly at scale.

Context window capacity differs between the two: Kimi K2 (Groq) supports up to 256,000 tokens in a single request, versus 131,072 tokens for Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image). A larger context window is essential for document summarization, large codebase analysis, and multi-document retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) applications.

Use the interactive calculator at the top of this page to enter your actual token usage and monthly request volume for a precise cost comparison tailored to your workload. Adjust for batch API discounts and prompt caching to find the most cost-effective option for your specific deployment.

Explore other model comparisons from the same providers or performance tiers.

Related Provider Pages

View complete pricing tables and model lineups for the providers behind these models.

Relevant Use Cases

See cost recommendations for workloads where Kimi K2 (Groq) or Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) is recommended.