Skip to main content

GPT OSS 120B (Fireworks) vs Llama 3.3 70B (Groq): API Cost Comparison

Compare the API pricing, context windows, features, and real-world cost projections for GPT OSS 120B (Fireworks) (Fireworks AI) and Llama 3.3 70B (Groq) (Groq). Use the interactive calculator below to compute your exact monthly cost based on your token usage and request volume.

Prices verified Mar 10, 2026

Interactive Cost Calculator

Fireworks AIGPT OSS 120B (Fireworks)GroqLlama 3.3 70B (Groq)

Fills in typical token counts for a workload type

Tokens in each prompt sent to the model

Tokens generated in each response

Total API calls per month

Showing costs for 2 models. Cheapest: GPT OSS 120B (Fireworks) at $4.50/month.

Cheapest: GPT OSS 120B (Fireworks) at $4.50/mo — save 54.3% vs Llama 3.3 70B (Groq)
Alert
BestGPT OSS 120B (Fireworks)
Fireworks AI$4.50$0.000450$1.50$3.0054.3%Alerts coming soon
Llama 3.3 70B (Groq)
Groq$9.85$0.000985$5.90$3.95Alerts coming soon

Monthly Cost Comparison

Price Comparison at a Glance

All prices are in USD per 1 million tokens ($/M tokens). Lower is cheaper.

Pricing TypeGPT OSS 120B (Fireworks)Llama 3.3 70B (Groq)Cheaper
Input (standard)$0.15/M$0.59/MGPT OSS 120B (Fireworks)
Output$0.60/M$0.79/MGPT OSS 120B (Fireworks)
Cached input$0.08/MN/A
Batch input$0.08/MN/A
Batch output$0.30/MN/A

Prices last verified: 2026-03-06 – 2026-03-10

Cost Breakdown by Usage Volume

Estimated monthly costs at different request volumes, assuming 1,000 input tokens and 500 output tokens per request. Adjust in the calculator above for your specific use case.

VolumeGPT OSS 120B (Fireworks)MonthlyLlama 3.3 70B (Groq)MonthlyGPT OSS 120B (Fireworks)Per requestLlama 3.3 70B (Groq)Per request
1K requests/mo$0.45$0.98$0.000450$0.000985
10K requests/mo$4.50$9.85$0.000450$0.000985
100K requests/mo$45.00$98.50$0.000450$0.000985
1M requests/mo$450.00$985.00$0.000450$0.000985

Green values indicate the lower-cost option at each volume tier. Cost per request is calculated at 1,000 input + 500 output tokens using standard (non-batch, non-cached) pricing.

Price History

Input price per 1M tokens

When to Choose GPT OSS 120B (Fireworks)

by Fireworks AI

  • Code generation
  • Document summarization
  • RAG / Semantic search

Input / 1M tokens

$0.15/M

Output / 1M tokens

$0.60/M

Context window

131,072

Tier

mid

When to Choose Llama 3.3 70B (Groq)

by Groq

  • General chatbot
  • Customer support

Input / 1M tokens

$0.59/M

Output / 1M tokens

$0.79/M

Context window

131,072

Tier

mid

Key Differences Beyond Price

Cost is only one factor in choosing an AI model. Context window size, rate limits, supported features, and latency all affect whether a model fits your use case.

CapabilityGPT OSS 120B (Fireworks)Llama 3.3 70B (Groq)
Context window131,072 tokens131,072 tokens
Max output tokens16,384 tokens32,768 tokens
Performance tierMidMid
Vision / image inputNoNo
Function callingYesYes
JSON modeYesYes
Prompt cachingYesNo
Batch API (50% discount)YesNo
Extended reasoningNoNo
Fine-tuningNoNo
Rate limit (req/min)Not published30

GPT OSS 120B (Fireworks) notes

Fireworks serverless pricing. Cached input 50% discount. Batch at 50% of serverless.

Llama 3.3 70B (Groq) notes

Fastest available inference speed (~500 tokens/sec). Free tier rate limits apply.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is GPT OSS 120B (Fireworks) cheaper than Llama 3.3 70B (Groq)?

At standard usage (1,000 input tokens, 500 output tokens, 100,000 requests/month), GPT OSS 120B (Fireworks) costs $45.00/month versus $98.50/month for Llama 3.3 70B (Groq) — a 54% saving. Your actual savings will vary based on your token profile; output-heavy workloads amplify differences in output pricing.

Which model has a larger context window, GPT OSS 120B (Fireworks) or Llama 3.3 70B (Groq)?

Both GPT OSS 120B (Fireworks) and Llama 3.3 70B (Groq) have the same context window: 131,072 tokens.

Do GPT OSS 120B (Fireworks) and Llama 3.3 70B (Groq) support the Batch API?

GPT OSS 120B (Fireworks) supports the Batch API (50% discount for async processing), while Llama 3.3 70B (Groq) does not. If your workload tolerates up to 24-hour latency, routing to GPT OSS 120B (Fireworks) with batch pricing could significantly cut costs versus Llama 3.3 70B (Groq)'s standard rate.

Which model offers better prompt caching?

GPT OSS 120B (Fireworks) supports prompt caching at $0.08/M for cached input, while Llama 3.3 70B (Groq) does not offer prompt caching. For RAG applications or chatbots with large, repeated context, GPT OSS 120B (Fireworks)'s caching capability can substantially reduce effective costs.

What are the best use cases for GPT OSS 120B (Fireworks) vs Llama 3.3 70B (Groq)?

GPT OSS 120B (Fireworks) is best suited for Code generation, Document summarization, RAG / Semantic search, while Llama 3.3 70B (Groq) is optimized for General chatbot, Customer support. Choose based on which use case matches your primary workload — and validate with the cost calculator above to confirm the total monthly spend fits your budget.

What is the cost per request for GPT OSS 120B (Fireworks) vs Llama 3.3 70B (Groq)?

At 1,000 input tokens and 500 output tokens per request — a typical conversational workload — GPT OSS 120B (Fireworks) costs $0.000450 per request and Llama 3.3 70B (Groq) costs $0.000985 per request. At 100,000 requests/month, that translates to $45.00 and $98.50 respectively. Use the interactive calculator to adjust these parameters for your actual workload.

GPT OSS 120B (Fireworks) vs Llama 3.3 70B (Groq): Summary

When comparing GPT OSS 120B (Fireworks) and Llama 3.3 70B (Groq) for API cost, the right choice depends on your workload's token profile, required features, and tolerance for latency. GPT OSS 120B (Fireworks) offers lower total cost at standard usage volumes (1,000 input + 500 output tokens per request at 100,000 requests/month) at $45.00/month, compared to $98.50/month for Llama 3.3 70B (Groq).

Both models are priced in USD per million tokens, the standard unit across all major AI API providers. GPT OSS 120B (Fireworks) charges $0.15/M for input tokens and $0.60/M for output tokens. Llama 3.3 70B (Groq) charges $0.59/M input and $0.79/M output. If your workload is output-heavy (more tokens generated than consumed as input), the model with the lower output price compounds cost savings significantly at scale.

Prompt caching is supported by GPT OSS 120B (Fireworks) but not Llama 3.3 70B (Groq). For workloads with large, repeated system prompts or document context — such as RAG pipelines or multi-turn conversations with a fixed knowledge base — prompt caching can reduce effective input costs by 60–90%, which may change the cost ranking between these two models at your specific usage pattern.

Context window capacity differs between the two: Both models support 131,072 tokens per request. A larger context window is essential for document summarization, large codebase analysis, and multi-document retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) applications.

Use the interactive calculator at the top of this page to enter your actual token usage and monthly request volume for a precise cost comparison tailored to your workload. Adjust for batch API discounts and prompt caching to find the most cost-effective option for your specific deployment.

Explore other model comparisons from the same providers or performance tiers.

Related Provider Pages

View complete pricing tables and model lineups for the providers behind these models.

Relevant Use Cases

See cost recommendations for workloads where GPT OSS 120B (Fireworks) or Llama 3.3 70B (Groq) is recommended.