Skip to main content

GPT OSS 120B (Cerebras) vs o4-mini: API Cost Comparison

Compare the API pricing, context windows, features, and real-world cost projections for GPT OSS 120B (Cerebras) (Cerebras) and o4-mini (OpenAI). Use the interactive calculator below to compute your exact monthly cost based on your token usage and request volume.

Prices verified Mar 10, 2026

Interactive Cost Calculator

CerebrasGPT OSS 120B (Cerebras)OpenAIo4-mini

Fills in typical token counts for a workload type

Tokens in each prompt sent to the model

Tokens generated in each response

Total API calls per month

Showing costs for 2 models. Cheapest: GPT OSS 120B (Cerebras) at $7.25/month.

Cheapest: GPT OSS 120B (Cerebras) at $7.25/mo — save 78.0% vs o4-mini
Alert
BestGPT OSS 120B (Cerebras)
Cerebras$7.25$0.000725$3.50$3.7578.0%Alerts coming soon
o4-mini
OpenAI$33.00$0.003300$11.00$22.00Alerts coming soon

Monthly Cost Comparison

Price Comparison at a Glance

All prices are in USD per 1 million tokens ($/M tokens). Lower is cheaper.

Pricing TypeGPT OSS 120B (Cerebras)o4-miniCheaper
Input (standard)$0.35/M$1.10/MGPT OSS 120B (Cerebras)
Output$0.75/M$4.40/MGPT OSS 120B (Cerebras)
Cached inputN/A$0.28/M
Batch inputN/A$0.55/M
Batch outputN/A$2.20/M

Prices last verified: 2026-03-08 – 2026-03-10

Cost Breakdown by Usage Volume

Estimated monthly costs at different request volumes, assuming 1,000 input tokens and 500 output tokens per request. Adjust in the calculator above for your specific use case.

VolumeGPT OSS 120B (Cerebras)Monthlyo4-miniMonthlyGPT OSS 120B (Cerebras)Per requesto4-miniPer request
1K requests/mo$0.72$3.30$0.000725$0.003300
10K requests/mo$7.25$33.00$0.000725$0.003300
100K requests/mo$72.50$330.00$0.000725$0.003300
1M requests/mo$725.00$3,300.00$0.000725$0.003300

Green values indicate the lower-cost option at each volume tier. Cost per request is calculated at 1,000 input + 500 output tokens using standard (non-batch, non-cached) pricing.

Price History

Input price per 1M tokens

When to Choose GPT OSS 120B (Cerebras)

by Cerebras

  • Code generation
  • Document summarization
  • General chatbot

Input / 1M tokens

$0.35/M

Output / 1M tokens

$0.75/M

Context window

128,000

Tier

mid

When to Choose o4-mini

by OpenAI

  • Code generation
  • Data extraction

Input / 1M tokens

$1.10/M

Output / 1M tokens

$4.40/M

Context window

200,000

Tier

reasoning

Key Differences Beyond Price

Cost is only one factor in choosing an AI model. Context window size, rate limits, supported features, and latency all affect whether a model fits your use case.

CapabilityGPT OSS 120B (Cerebras)o4-mini
Context window128,000 tokens200,000 tokens
Max output tokens16,384 tokens100,000 tokens
Performance tierMidReasoning
Vision / image inputNoYes
Function callingYesYes
JSON modeYesYes
Prompt cachingNoYes
Batch API (50% discount)NoYes
Extended reasoningNoYes
Fine-tuningNoNo
Rate limit (req/min)Not published1,000

GPT OSS 120B (Cerebras) notes

Cerebras wafer-scale inference: ~3,000 tokens/sec. Best for latency-critical production workloads requiring a large model.

o4-mini notes

Configurable reasoning effort. Best budget reasoning model from OpenAI.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is GPT OSS 120B (Cerebras) cheaper than o4-mini?

At standard usage (1,000 input tokens, 500 output tokens, 100,000 requests/month), GPT OSS 120B (Cerebras) costs $72.50/month versus $330.00/month for o4-mini — a 78% saving. Your actual savings will vary based on your token profile; output-heavy workloads amplify differences in output pricing.

Which model has a larger context window, GPT OSS 120B (Cerebras) or o4-mini?

o4-mini has a larger context window at 200,000 tokens, compared to 128,000 tokens for GPT OSS 120B (Cerebras). A larger context window is important for processing long documents, multi-turn conversations, or large codebases without truncation.

Do GPT OSS 120B (Cerebras) and o4-mini support the Batch API?

o4-mini supports the Batch API (50% discount for async processing), while GPT OSS 120B (Cerebras) does not. If your workload tolerates up to 24-hour latency, routing to o4-mini with batch pricing could significantly cut costs versus GPT OSS 120B (Cerebras)'s standard rate.

Which model offers better prompt caching?

o4-mini supports prompt caching at $0.28/M for cached input, while GPT OSS 120B (Cerebras) does not offer prompt caching. For RAG applications or chatbots with large, repeated context, o4-mini's caching capability can substantially reduce effective costs.

What are the best use cases for GPT OSS 120B (Cerebras) vs o4-mini?

Both models are well-suited for Code generation. GPT OSS 120B (Cerebras) is particularly strong for Document summarization, General chatbot. o4-mini is favored for Data extraction. At the same quality level, the lower-cost model is usually preferable; use this page's calculator to compare total monthly spend at your volume.

What is the cost per request for GPT OSS 120B (Cerebras) vs o4-mini?

At 1,000 input tokens and 500 output tokens per request — a typical conversational workload — GPT OSS 120B (Cerebras) costs $0.000725 per request and o4-mini costs $0.003300 per request. At 100,000 requests/month, that translates to $72.50 and $330.00 respectively. Use the interactive calculator to adjust these parameters for your actual workload.

GPT OSS 120B (Cerebras) vs o4-mini: Summary

When comparing GPT OSS 120B (Cerebras) and o4-mini for API cost, the right choice depends on your workload's token profile, required features, and tolerance for latency. GPT OSS 120B (Cerebras) offers lower total cost at standard usage volumes (1,000 input + 500 output tokens per request at 100,000 requests/month) at $72.50/month, compared to $330.00/month for o4-mini.

Both models are priced in USD per million tokens, the standard unit across all major AI API providers. GPT OSS 120B (Cerebras) charges $0.35/M for input tokens and $0.75/M for output tokens. o4-mini charges $1.10/M input and $4.40/M output. If your workload is output-heavy (more tokens generated than consumed as input), the model with the lower output price compounds cost savings significantly at scale.

Prompt caching is supported by o4-mini but not GPT OSS 120B (Cerebras). For workloads with large, repeated system prompts or document context — such as RAG pipelines or multi-turn conversations with a fixed knowledge base — prompt caching can reduce effective input costs by 60–90%, which may change the cost ranking between these two models at your specific usage pattern.

Context window capacity differs between the two: o4-mini supports up to 200,000 tokens in a single request, versus 128,000 tokens for GPT OSS 120B (Cerebras). A larger context window is essential for document summarization, large codebase analysis, and multi-document retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) applications.

Use the interactive calculator at the top of this page to enter your actual token usage and monthly request volume for a precise cost comparison tailored to your workload. Adjust for batch API discounts and prompt caching to find the most cost-effective option for your specific deployment.

Explore other model comparisons from the same providers or performance tiers.

Related Provider Pages

View complete pricing tables and model lineups for the providers behind these models.

Relevant Use Cases

See cost recommendations for workloads where GPT OSS 120B (Cerebras) or o4-mini is recommended.