Skip to main content

GPT-5 vs Mistral: Mistral Medium 3.5: API Cost Comparison

Compare the API pricing, context windows, features, and real-world cost projections for GPT-5 (OpenAI) and Mistral: Mistral Medium 3.5 (Mistral AI). Use the interactive calculator below to compute your exact monthly cost based on your token usage and request volume.

Prices verified May 6, 2026

Interactive Cost Calculator

OpenAIGPT-5Mistral AIMistral: Mistral Medium 3.5

Fills in typical token counts for a workload type

Tokens in each prompt sent to the model

Tokens generated in each response

Total API calls per month

Showing costs for 2 models. Cheapest: Mistral: Mistral Medium 3.5 at $52.50/month.

Cheapest: Mistral: Mistral Medium 3.5 at $52.50/mo — save 16.0% vs GPT-5
Alert
BestMistral: Mistral Medium 3.5
Mistral AI$52.50$0.005250$15.00$37.5016.0%Alerts coming soon
GPT-5
OpenAI$62.50$0.006250$12.50$50.00Alerts coming soon

Monthly Cost Comparison

Price Comparison at a Glance

All prices are in USD per 1 million tokens ($/M tokens). Lower is cheaper.

Pricing TypeGPT-5Mistral: Mistral Medium 3.5Cheaper
Input (standard)$1.25/M$1.50/MGPT-5
Output$10.00/M$7.50/MMistral: Mistral Medium 3.5
Cached input$0.13/MN/A

Prices last verified: 2026-03-06 – 2026-05-06

Cost Breakdown by Usage Volume

Estimated monthly costs at different request volumes, assuming 1,000 input tokens and 500 output tokens per request. Adjust in the calculator above for your specific use case.

VolumeGPT-5MonthlyMistral: Mistral Medium 3.5MonthlyGPT-5Per requestMistral: Mistral Medium 3.5Per request
1K requests/mo$6.25$5.25$0.006250$0.005250
10K requests/mo$62.50$52.50$0.006250$0.005250
100K requests/mo$625.00$525.00$0.006250$0.005250
1M requests/mo$6,250.00$5,250.00$0.006250$0.005250

Green values indicate the lower-cost option at each volume tier. Cost per request is calculated at 1,000 input + 500 output tokens using standard (non-batch, non-cached) pricing.

Price History

Input price per 1M tokens

When to Choose GPT-5

by OpenAI

  • General chatbot
  • Code generation
  • Content & copywriting

Input / 1M tokens

$1.25/M

Output / 1M tokens

$10.00/M

Context window

400,000

Tier

premium

When to Choose Mistral: Mistral Medium 3.5

by Mistral AI

  • General chatbot

Input / 1M tokens

$1.50/M

Output / 1M tokens

$7.50/M

Context window

262,144

Tier

mid

Key Differences Beyond Price

Cost is only one factor in choosing an AI model. Context window size, rate limits, supported features, and latency all affect whether a model fits your use case.

CapabilityGPT-5Mistral: Mistral Medium 3.5
Context window400,000 tokens262,144 tokens
Max output tokens128,000 tokens4,096 tokens
Performance tierPremiumMid
Vision / image inputYesYes
Function callingYesYes
JSON modeYesYes
Prompt cachingYesNo
Batch API (50% discount)NoNo
Extended reasoningNoYes
Fine-tuningNoNo
Rate limit (req/min)10,000Not published

GPT-5 notes

1M context window. High-capability model between GPT-5.1 and GPT-5 mini.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is GPT-5 cheaper than Mistral: Mistral Medium 3.5?

At standard usage (1,000 input tokens, 500 output tokens, 100,000 requests/month), Mistral: Mistral Medium 3.5 costs $525.00/month versus $625.00/month for GPT-5 — a 16% saving. Your actual savings will vary based on your token profile; output-heavy workloads amplify differences in output pricing.

Which model has a larger context window, GPT-5 or Mistral: Mistral Medium 3.5?

GPT-5 has a larger context window at 400,000 tokens, compared to 262,144 tokens for Mistral: Mistral Medium 3.5. A larger context window is important for processing long documents, multi-turn conversations, or large codebases without truncation.

Do GPT-5 and Mistral: Mistral Medium 3.5 support the Batch API?

Neither GPT-5 nor Mistral: Mistral Medium 3.5 currently supports a batch API with discounted pricing. For batch-eligible alternatives, consider models from OpenAI, Anthropic, or Google that include batch API support.

Which model offers better prompt caching?

GPT-5 supports prompt caching at $0.13/M for cached input, while Mistral: Mistral Medium 3.5 does not offer prompt caching. For RAG applications or chatbots with large, repeated context, GPT-5's caching capability can substantially reduce effective costs.

What are the best use cases for GPT-5 vs Mistral: Mistral Medium 3.5?

Both models are well-suited for General chatbot. GPT-5 is particularly strong for Code generation, Content & copywriting. Mistral: Mistral Medium 3.5 is favored for similar workflows. At the same quality level, the lower-cost model is usually preferable; use this page's calculator to compare total monthly spend at your volume.

What is the cost per request for GPT-5 vs Mistral: Mistral Medium 3.5?

At 1,000 input tokens and 500 output tokens per request — a typical conversational workload — GPT-5 costs $0.006250 per request and Mistral: Mistral Medium 3.5 costs $0.005250 per request. At 100,000 requests/month, that translates to $625.00 and $525.00 respectively. Use the interactive calculator to adjust these parameters for your actual workload.

GPT-5 vs Mistral: Mistral Medium 3.5: Summary

When comparing GPT-5 and Mistral: Mistral Medium 3.5 for API cost, the right choice depends on your workload's token profile, required features, and tolerance for latency. Mistral: Mistral Medium 3.5 offers lower total cost at standard usage volumes (1,000 input + 500 output tokens per request at 100,000 requests/month) at $525.00/month, compared to $625.00/month for GPT-5.

Both models are priced in USD per million tokens, the standard unit across all major AI API providers. GPT-5 charges $1.25/M for input tokens and $10.00/M for output tokens. Mistral: Mistral Medium 3.5 charges $1.50/M input and $7.50/M output. If your workload is output-heavy (more tokens generated than consumed as input), the model with the lower output price compounds cost savings significantly at scale.

Prompt caching is supported by GPT-5 but not Mistral: Mistral Medium 3.5. For workloads with large, repeated system prompts or document context — such as RAG pipelines or multi-turn conversations with a fixed knowledge base — prompt caching can reduce effective input costs by 60–90%, which may change the cost ranking between these two models at your specific usage pattern.

Context window capacity differs between the two: GPT-5 supports up to 400,000 tokens in a single request, versus 262,144 tokens for Mistral: Mistral Medium 3.5. A larger context window is essential for document summarization, large codebase analysis, and multi-document retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) applications.

Use the interactive calculator at the top of this page to enter your actual token usage and monthly request volume for a precise cost comparison tailored to your workload. Adjust for batch API discounts and prompt caching to find the most cost-effective option for your specific deployment.

Explore other model comparisons from the same providers or performance tiers.

Related Provider Pages

View complete pricing tables and model lineups for the providers behind these models.

Relevant Use Cases

See cost recommendations for workloads where GPT-5 or Mistral: Mistral Medium 3.5 is recommended.