Skip to main content

GPT-5.4 vs Llama 3.1 405B (SambaNova): API Cost Comparison

Compare the API pricing, context windows, features, and real-world cost projections for GPT-5.4 (OpenAI) and Llama 3.1 405B (SambaNova) (SambaNova). Use the interactive calculator below to compute your exact monthly cost based on your token usage and request volume.

Prices verified Mar 11, 2026

Interactive Cost Calculator

OpenAIGPT-5.4SambaNovaLlama 3.1 405B (SambaNova)

Fills in typical token counts for a workload type

Tokens in each prompt sent to the model

Tokens generated in each response

Total API calls per month

Showing costs for 2 models. Cheapest: GPT-5.4 at $100.00/month.

Cheapest: GPT-5.4 at $100.00/mo
Alert
BestGPT-5.4
OpenAI$100.00$0.010000$25.00$75.00Alerts coming soon
Llama 3.1 405B (SambaNova)
SambaNova$100.00$0.010000$50.00$50.00Alerts coming soon

Monthly Cost Comparison

Price Comparison at a Glance

All prices are in USD per 1 million tokens ($/M tokens). Lower is cheaper.

Pricing TypeGPT-5.4Llama 3.1 405B (SambaNova)Cheaper
Input (standard)$2.50/M$5.00/MGPT-5.4
Output$15.00/M$10.00/MLlama 3.1 405B (SambaNova)
Cached input$0.25/MN/A

Prices last verified: 2026-03-08 – 2026-03-11

Cost Breakdown by Usage Volume

Estimated monthly costs at different request volumes, assuming 1,000 input tokens and 500 output tokens per request. Adjust in the calculator above for your specific use case.

VolumeGPT-5.4MonthlyLlama 3.1 405B (SambaNova)MonthlyGPT-5.4Per requestLlama 3.1 405B (SambaNova)Per request
1K requests/mo$10.00$10.00$0.010000$0.010000
10K requests/mo$100.00$100.00$0.010000$0.010000
100K requests/mo$1,000.00$1,000.00$0.010000$0.010000
1M requests/mo$10,000.00$10,000.00$0.010000$0.010000

Green values indicate the lower-cost option at each volume tier. Cost per request is calculated at 1,000 input + 500 output tokens using standard (non-batch, non-cached) pricing.

Price History

Input price per 1M tokens

When to Choose GPT-5.4

by OpenAI

  • Code generation
  • Document summarization
  • RAG / Semantic search

Input / 1M tokens

$2.50/M

Output / 1M tokens

$15.00/M

Context window

1,050,000

Tier

premium

When to Choose Llama 3.1 405B (SambaNova)

by SambaNova

  • Code generation
  • Content Creation
  • General chatbot

Input / 1M tokens

$5.00/M

Output / 1M tokens

$10.00/M

Context window

128,000

Tier

premium

Key Differences Beyond Price

Cost is only one factor in choosing an AI model. Context window size, rate limits, supported features, and latency all affect whether a model fits your use case.

CapabilityGPT-5.4Llama 3.1 405B (SambaNova)
Context window1,050,000 tokens128,000 tokens
Max output tokens128,000 tokens8,192 tokens
Performance tierPremiumPremium
Vision / image inputYesNo
Function callingYesYes
JSON modeYesYes
Prompt cachingYesNo
Batch API (50% discount)NoNo
Extended reasoningNoNo
Fine-tuningNoNo
Rate limit (req/min)10,000Not published

GPT-5.4 notes

Latest and most powerful OpenAI model. 1.05M context window. Prompts over 272K input tokens priced at 2x input and 1.5x output.

Llama 3.1 405B (SambaNova) notes

Llama 3.1 405B served on SambaNova's custom DataScale AI chips for maximum throughput. Open-source weights with enterprise reliability.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is GPT-5.4 cheaper than Llama 3.1 405B (SambaNova)?

GPT-5.4 and Llama 3.1 405B (SambaNova) cost the same at standard usage (1,000 input + 500 output tokens, 100K requests/month): $1,000.00/month each. For different token ratios, use the calculator above.

Which model has a larger context window, GPT-5.4 or Llama 3.1 405B (SambaNova)?

GPT-5.4 has a larger context window at 1,050,000 tokens, compared to 128,000 tokens for Llama 3.1 405B (SambaNova). A larger context window is important for processing long documents, multi-turn conversations, or large codebases without truncation.

Do GPT-5.4 and Llama 3.1 405B (SambaNova) support the Batch API?

Neither GPT-5.4 nor Llama 3.1 405B (SambaNova) currently supports a batch API with discounted pricing. For batch-eligible alternatives, consider models from OpenAI, Anthropic, or Google that include batch API support.

Which model offers better prompt caching?

GPT-5.4 supports prompt caching at $0.25/M for cached input, while Llama 3.1 405B (SambaNova) does not offer prompt caching. For RAG applications or chatbots with large, repeated context, GPT-5.4's caching capability can substantially reduce effective costs.

What are the best use cases for GPT-5.4 vs Llama 3.1 405B (SambaNova)?

Both models are well-suited for Code generation. GPT-5.4 is particularly strong for Document summarization, RAG / Semantic search. Llama 3.1 405B (SambaNova) is favored for Content Creation, General chatbot. At the same quality level, the lower-cost model is usually preferable; use this page's calculator to compare total monthly spend at your volume.

What is the cost per request for GPT-5.4 vs Llama 3.1 405B (SambaNova)?

At 1,000 input tokens and 500 output tokens per request — a typical conversational workload — GPT-5.4 costs $0.010000 per request and Llama 3.1 405B (SambaNova) costs $0.010000 per request. At 100,000 requests/month, that translates to $1,000.00 and $1,000.00 respectively. Use the interactive calculator to adjust these parameters for your actual workload.

GPT-5.4 vs Llama 3.1 405B (SambaNova): Summary

When comparing GPT-5.4 and Llama 3.1 405B (SambaNova) for API cost, the right choice depends on your workload's token profile, required features, and tolerance for latency. Both models cost the same at standard usage volumes (1,000 input + 500 output tokens per request at 100,000 requests/month) at $1,000.00/month.

Both models are priced in USD per million tokens, the standard unit across all major AI API providers. GPT-5.4 charges $2.50/M for input tokens and $15.00/M for output tokens. Llama 3.1 405B (SambaNova) charges $5.00/M input and $10.00/M output. If your workload is output-heavy (more tokens generated than consumed as input), the model with the lower output price compounds cost savings significantly at scale.

Prompt caching is supported by GPT-5.4 but not Llama 3.1 405B (SambaNova). For workloads with large, repeated system prompts or document context — such as RAG pipelines or multi-turn conversations with a fixed knowledge base — prompt caching can reduce effective input costs by 60–90%, which may change the cost ranking between these two models at your specific usage pattern.

Context window capacity differs between the two: GPT-5.4 supports up to 1,050,000 tokens in a single request, versus 128,000 tokens for Llama 3.1 405B (SambaNova). A larger context window is essential for document summarization, large codebase analysis, and multi-document retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) applications.

Use the interactive calculator at the top of this page to enter your actual token usage and monthly request volume for a precise cost comparison tailored to your workload. Adjust for batch API discounts and prompt caching to find the most cost-effective option for your specific deployment.

Explore other model comparisons from the same providers or performance tiers.

Related Provider Pages

View complete pricing tables and model lineups for the providers behind these models.

Relevant Use Cases

See cost recommendations for workloads where GPT-5.4 or Llama 3.1 405B (SambaNova) is recommended.