Skip to main content

GPT-5.1 (Azure) vs Mistral Large (Bedrock): API Cost Comparison

Compare the API pricing, context windows, features, and real-world cost projections for GPT-5.1 (Azure) (Azure OpenAI) and Mistral Large (Bedrock) (AWS Bedrock). Use the interactive calculator below to compute your exact monthly cost based on your token usage and request volume.

Prices verified Mar 11, 2026

Interactive Cost Calculator

Azure OpenAIGPT-5.1 (Azure)AWS BedrockMistral Large (Bedrock)

Fills in typical token counts for a workload type

Tokens in each prompt sent to the model

Tokens generated in each response

Total API calls per month

Showing costs for 2 models. Cheapest: GPT-5.1 (Azure) at $62.50/month.

Cheapest: GPT-5.1 (Azure) at $62.50/mo — save 37.5% vs Mistral Large (Bedrock)
Alert
BestGPT-5.1 (Azure)
Azure OpenAI$62.50$0.006250$12.50$50.0037.5%Alerts coming soon
Mistral Large (Bedrock)
AWS Bedrock$100.00$0.010000$40.00$60.00Alerts coming soon

Monthly Cost Comparison

Price Comparison at a Glance

All prices are in USD per 1 million tokens ($/M tokens). Lower is cheaper.

Pricing TypeGPT-5.1 (Azure)Mistral Large (Bedrock)Cheaper
Input (standard)$1.25/M$4.00/MGPT-5.1 (Azure)
Output$10.00/M$12.00/MGPT-5.1 (Azure)

Prices last verified: 2026-03-11

Cost Breakdown by Usage Volume

Estimated monthly costs at different request volumes, assuming 1,000 input tokens and 500 output tokens per request. Adjust in the calculator above for your specific use case.

VolumeGPT-5.1 (Azure)MonthlyMistral Large (Bedrock)MonthlyGPT-5.1 (Azure)Per requestMistral Large (Bedrock)Per request
1K requests/mo$6.25$10.00$0.006250$0.010000
10K requests/mo$62.50$100.00$0.006250$0.010000
100K requests/mo$625.00$1,000.00$0.006250$0.010000
1M requests/mo$6,250.00$10,000.00$0.006250$0.010000

Green values indicate the lower-cost option at each volume tier. Cost per request is calculated at 1,000 input + 500 output tokens using standard (non-batch, non-cached) pricing.

Price History

Input price per 1M tokens

When to Choose GPT-5.1 (Azure)

by Azure OpenAI

  • Summarization
  • Content Creation
  • Rag Retrieval

Input / 1M tokens

$1.25/M

Output / 1M tokens

$10.00/M

Context window

128,000

Tier

mid

When to Choose Mistral Large (Bedrock)

by AWS Bedrock

  • Code generation
  • Content Creation
  • Summarization

Input / 1M tokens

$4.00/M

Output / 1M tokens

$12.00/M

Context window

128,000

Tier

premium

Key Differences Beyond Price

Cost is only one factor in choosing an AI model. Context window size, rate limits, supported features, and latency all affect whether a model fits your use case.

CapabilityGPT-5.1 (Azure)Mistral Large (Bedrock)
Context window128,000 tokens128,000 tokens
Max output tokens32,768 tokens8,192 tokens
Performance tierMidPremium
Vision / image inputYesNo
Function callingYesYes
JSON modeYesYes
Prompt cachingNoNo
Batch API (50% discount)NoYes
Extended reasoningNoNo
Fine-tuningNoNo

GPT-5.1 (Azure) notes

GPT-5.1 via Azure OpenAI Service. Mid-tier GPT-5 variant for enterprise teams needing strong performance with Azure's managed infrastructure and SLA guarantees.

Mistral Large (Bedrock) notes

Mistral Large via AWS Bedrock. Strong multilingual performance. Useful for enterprises already on AWS that need Mistral's capabilities with native AWS security.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is GPT-5.1 (Azure) cheaper than Mistral Large (Bedrock)?

At standard usage (1,000 input tokens, 500 output tokens, 100,000 requests/month), GPT-5.1 (Azure) costs $625.00/month versus $1,000.00/month for Mistral Large (Bedrock) — a 38% saving. Your actual savings will vary based on your token profile; output-heavy workloads amplify differences in output pricing.

Which model has a larger context window, GPT-5.1 (Azure) or Mistral Large (Bedrock)?

Both GPT-5.1 (Azure) and Mistral Large (Bedrock) have the same context window: 128,000 tokens.

Do GPT-5.1 (Azure) and Mistral Large (Bedrock) support the Batch API?

Mistral Large (Bedrock) supports the Batch API (50% discount for async processing), while GPT-5.1 (Azure) does not. If your workload tolerates up to 24-hour latency, routing to Mistral Large (Bedrock) with batch pricing could significantly cut costs versus GPT-5.1 (Azure)'s standard rate.

Which model offers better prompt caching?

Neither GPT-5.1 (Azure) nor Mistral Large (Bedrock) currently supports prompt caching. For prompt-caching capable alternatives, consider Claude models from Anthropic or GPT-4o from OpenAI.

What are the best use cases for GPT-5.1 (Azure) vs Mistral Large (Bedrock)?

Both models are well-suited for Summarization, Content Creation. GPT-5.1 (Azure) is particularly strong for Rag Retrieval. Mistral Large (Bedrock) is favored for Code generation. At the same quality level, the lower-cost model is usually preferable; use this page's calculator to compare total monthly spend at your volume.

What is the cost per request for GPT-5.1 (Azure) vs Mistral Large (Bedrock)?

At 1,000 input tokens and 500 output tokens per request — a typical conversational workload — GPT-5.1 (Azure) costs $0.006250 per request and Mistral Large (Bedrock) costs $0.010000 per request. At 100,000 requests/month, that translates to $625.00 and $1,000.00 respectively. Use the interactive calculator to adjust these parameters for your actual workload.

GPT-5.1 (Azure) vs Mistral Large (Bedrock): Summary

When comparing GPT-5.1 (Azure) and Mistral Large (Bedrock) for API cost, the right choice depends on your workload's token profile, required features, and tolerance for latency. GPT-5.1 (Azure) offers lower total cost at standard usage volumes (1,000 input + 500 output tokens per request at 100,000 requests/month) at $625.00/month, compared to $1,000.00/month for Mistral Large (Bedrock).

Both models are priced in USD per million tokens, the standard unit across all major AI API providers. GPT-5.1 (Azure) charges $1.25/M for input tokens and $10.00/M for output tokens. Mistral Large (Bedrock) charges $4.00/M input and $12.00/M output. If your workload is output-heavy (more tokens generated than consumed as input), the model with the lower output price compounds cost savings significantly at scale.

Context window capacity differs between the two: Both models support 128,000 tokens per request. A larger context window is essential for document summarization, large codebase analysis, and multi-document retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) applications.

Use the interactive calculator at the top of this page to enter your actual token usage and monthly request volume for a precise cost comparison tailored to your workload. Adjust for batch API discounts and prompt caching to find the most cost-effective option for your specific deployment.

Explore other model comparisons from the same providers or performance tiers.

Related Provider Pages

View complete pricing tables and model lineups for the providers behind these models.

Relevant Use Cases

See cost recommendations for workloads where GPT-5.1 (Azure) or Mistral Large (Bedrock) is recommended.