Skip to main content

Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview vs Nemotron 3 Super: API Cost Comparison

Compare the API pricing, context windows, features, and real-world cost projections for Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview (Google) and Nemotron 3 Super (Nvidia NIM). Use the interactive calculator below to compute your exact monthly cost based on your token usage and request volume.

Prices verified Mar 27, 2026

Interactive Cost Calculator

GoogleGemini 3.1 Flash Image PreviewNvidia NIMNemotron 3 Super

Fills in typical token counts for a workload type

Tokens in each prompt sent to the model

Tokens generated in each response

Total API calls per month

Showing costs for 2 models. Cheapest: Nemotron 3 Super at $3.50/month.

Cheapest: Nemotron 3 Super at $3.50/mo — save 82.5% vs Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview
Alert
BestNemotron 3 Super
Nvidia NIM$3.50$0.000350$1.00$2.5082.5%Alerts coming soon
Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview
Google$20.00$0.002000$5.00$15.00Alerts coming soon

Monthly Cost Comparison

Price Comparison at a Glance

All prices are in USD per 1 million tokens ($/M tokens). Lower is cheaper.

Pricing TypeGemini 3.1 Flash Image PreviewNemotron 3 SuperCheaper
Input (standard)$0.50/M$0.10/MNemotron 3 Super
Output$3.00/M$0.50/MNemotron 3 Super

Prices last verified: 2026-03-27

Cost Breakdown by Usage Volume

Estimated monthly costs at different request volumes, assuming 1,000 input tokens and 500 output tokens per request. Adjust in the calculator above for your specific use case.

VolumeGemini 3.1 Flash Image PreviewMonthlyNemotron 3 SuperMonthlyGemini 3.1 Flash Image PreviewPer requestNemotron 3 SuperPer request
1K requests/mo$2.00$0.35$0.002000$0.000350
10K requests/mo$20.00$3.50$0.002000$0.000350
100K requests/mo$200.00$35.00$0.002000$0.000350
1M requests/mo$2,000.00$350.00$0.002000$0.000350

Green values indicate the lower-cost option at each volume tier. Cost per request is calculated at 1,000 input + 500 output tokens using standard (non-batch, non-cached) pricing.

Price History

Input price per 1M tokens

When to Choose Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview

by Google

  • General chatbot

Input / 1M tokens

$0.50/M

Output / 1M tokens

$3.00/M

Context window

65,536

Tier

budget

When to Choose Nemotron 3 Super

by Nvidia NIM

  • General chatbot

Input / 1M tokens

$0.10/M

Output / 1M tokens

$0.50/M

Context window

262,144

Tier

budget

Key Differences Beyond Price

Cost is only one factor in choosing an AI model. Context window size, rate limits, supported features, and latency all affect whether a model fits your use case.

CapabilityGemini 3.1 Flash Image PreviewNemotron 3 Super
Context window65,536 tokens262,144 tokens
Max output tokens65,536 tokens4,096 tokens
Performance tierBudgetBudget
Vision / image inputYesNo
Function callingYesYes
JSON modeYesYes
Prompt cachingNoNo
Batch API (50% discount)NoNo
Extended reasoningNoNo
Fine-tuningNoNo

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview cheaper than Nemotron 3 Super?

At standard usage (1,000 input tokens, 500 output tokens, 100,000 requests/month), Nemotron 3 Super costs $35.00/month versus $200.00/month for Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview — a 83% saving. Your actual savings will vary based on your token profile; output-heavy workloads amplify differences in output pricing.

Which model has a larger context window, Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview or Nemotron 3 Super?

Nemotron 3 Super has a larger context window at 262,144 tokens, compared to 65,536 tokens for Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview. A larger context window is important for processing long documents, multi-turn conversations, or large codebases without truncation.

Do Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview and Nemotron 3 Super support the Batch API?

Neither Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview nor Nemotron 3 Super currently supports a batch API with discounted pricing. For batch-eligible alternatives, consider models from OpenAI, Anthropic, or Google that include batch API support.

Which model offers better prompt caching?

Neither Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview nor Nemotron 3 Super currently supports prompt caching. For prompt-caching capable alternatives, consider Claude models from Anthropic or GPT-4o from OpenAI.

What are the best use cases for Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview vs Nemotron 3 Super?

Both models are well-suited for General chatbot. Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview is particularly strong for overlapping tasks. Nemotron 3 Super is favored for similar workflows. At the same quality level, the lower-cost model is usually preferable; use this page's calculator to compare total monthly spend at your volume.

What is the cost per request for Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview vs Nemotron 3 Super?

At 1,000 input tokens and 500 output tokens per request — a typical conversational workload — Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview costs $0.002000 per request and Nemotron 3 Super costs $0.000350 per request. At 100,000 requests/month, that translates to $200.00 and $35.00 respectively. Use the interactive calculator to adjust these parameters for your actual workload.

Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview vs Nemotron 3 Super: Summary

When comparing Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview and Nemotron 3 Super for API cost, the right choice depends on your workload's token profile, required features, and tolerance for latency. Nemotron 3 Super offers lower total cost at standard usage volumes (1,000 input + 500 output tokens per request at 100,000 requests/month) at $35.00/month, compared to $200.00/month for Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview.

Both models are priced in USD per million tokens, the standard unit across all major AI API providers. Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview charges $0.50/M for input tokens and $3.00/M for output tokens. Nemotron 3 Super charges $0.10/M input and $0.50/M output. If your workload is output-heavy (more tokens generated than consumed as input), the model with the lower output price compounds cost savings significantly at scale.

Context window capacity differs between the two: Nemotron 3 Super supports up to 262,144 tokens in a single request, versus 65,536 tokens for Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview. A larger context window is essential for document summarization, large codebase analysis, and multi-document retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) applications.

Use the interactive calculator at the top of this page to enter your actual token usage and monthly request volume for a precise cost comparison tailored to your workload. Adjust for batch API discounts and prompt caching to find the most cost-effective option for your specific deployment.

Explore other model comparisons from the same providers or performance tiers.

Related Provider Pages

View complete pricing tables and model lineups for the providers behind these models.

Relevant Use Cases

See cost recommendations for workloads where Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview or Nemotron 3 Super is recommended.