Skip to main content

Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview vs Mistral: Mistral Medium 3.5: API Cost Comparison

Compare the API pricing, context windows, features, and real-world cost projections for Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview (Google) and Mistral: Mistral Medium 3.5 (Mistral AI). Use the interactive calculator below to compute your exact monthly cost based on your token usage and request volume.

Prices verified May 6, 2026

Interactive Cost Calculator

GoogleGemini 3.1 Flash Image PreviewMistral AIMistral: Mistral Medium 3.5

Fills in typical token counts for a workload type

Tokens in each prompt sent to the model

Tokens generated in each response

Total API calls per month

Showing costs for 2 models. Cheapest: Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview at $20.00/month.

Cheapest: Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview at $20.00/mo — save 61.9% vs Mistral: Mistral Medium 3.5
Alert
BestGemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview
Google$20.00$0.002000$5.00$15.0061.9%Alerts coming soon
Mistral: Mistral Medium 3.5
Mistral AI$52.50$0.005250$15.00$37.50Alerts coming soon

Monthly Cost Comparison

Price Comparison at a Glance

All prices are in USD per 1 million tokens ($/M tokens). Lower is cheaper.

Pricing TypeGemini 3.1 Flash Image PreviewMistral: Mistral Medium 3.5Cheaper
Input (standard)$0.50/M$1.50/MGemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview
Output$3.00/M$7.50/MGemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview

Prices last verified: 2026-03-27 – 2026-05-06

Cost Breakdown by Usage Volume

Estimated monthly costs at different request volumes, assuming 1,000 input tokens and 500 output tokens per request. Adjust in the calculator above for your specific use case.

VolumeGemini 3.1 Flash Image PreviewMonthlyMistral: Mistral Medium 3.5MonthlyGemini 3.1 Flash Image PreviewPer requestMistral: Mistral Medium 3.5Per request
1K requests/mo$2.00$5.25$0.002000$0.005250
10K requests/mo$20.00$52.50$0.002000$0.005250
100K requests/mo$200.00$525.00$0.002000$0.005250
1M requests/mo$2,000.00$5,250.00$0.002000$0.005250

Green values indicate the lower-cost option at each volume tier. Cost per request is calculated at 1,000 input + 500 output tokens using standard (non-batch, non-cached) pricing.

Price History

Input price per 1M tokens

When to Choose Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview

by Google

  • General chatbot

Input / 1M tokens

$0.50/M

Output / 1M tokens

$3.00/M

Context window

65,536

Tier

budget

When to Choose Mistral: Mistral Medium 3.5

by Mistral AI

  • General chatbot

Input / 1M tokens

$1.50/M

Output / 1M tokens

$7.50/M

Context window

262,144

Tier

mid

Key Differences Beyond Price

Cost is only one factor in choosing an AI model. Context window size, rate limits, supported features, and latency all affect whether a model fits your use case.

CapabilityGemini 3.1 Flash Image PreviewMistral: Mistral Medium 3.5
Context window65,536 tokens262,144 tokens
Max output tokens65,536 tokens4,096 tokens
Performance tierBudgetMid
Vision / image inputYesYes
Function callingYesYes
JSON modeYesYes
Prompt cachingNoNo
Batch API (50% discount)NoNo
Extended reasoningNoYes
Fine-tuningNoNo

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview cheaper than Mistral: Mistral Medium 3.5?

At standard usage (1,000 input tokens, 500 output tokens, 100,000 requests/month), Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview costs $200.00/month versus $525.00/month for Mistral: Mistral Medium 3.5 — a 62% saving. Your actual savings will vary based on your token profile; output-heavy workloads amplify differences in output pricing.

Which model has a larger context window, Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview or Mistral: Mistral Medium 3.5?

Mistral: Mistral Medium 3.5 has a larger context window at 262,144 tokens, compared to 65,536 tokens for Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview. A larger context window is important for processing long documents, multi-turn conversations, or large codebases without truncation.

Do Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview and Mistral: Mistral Medium 3.5 support the Batch API?

Neither Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview nor Mistral: Mistral Medium 3.5 currently supports a batch API with discounted pricing. For batch-eligible alternatives, consider models from OpenAI, Anthropic, or Google that include batch API support.

Which model offers better prompt caching?

Neither Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview nor Mistral: Mistral Medium 3.5 currently supports prompt caching. For prompt-caching capable alternatives, consider Claude models from Anthropic or GPT-4o from OpenAI.

What are the best use cases for Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview vs Mistral: Mistral Medium 3.5?

Both models are well-suited for General chatbot. Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview is particularly strong for overlapping tasks. Mistral: Mistral Medium 3.5 is favored for similar workflows. At the same quality level, the lower-cost model is usually preferable; use this page's calculator to compare total monthly spend at your volume.

What is the cost per request for Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview vs Mistral: Mistral Medium 3.5?

At 1,000 input tokens and 500 output tokens per request — a typical conversational workload — Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview costs $0.002000 per request and Mistral: Mistral Medium 3.5 costs $0.005250 per request. At 100,000 requests/month, that translates to $200.00 and $525.00 respectively. Use the interactive calculator to adjust these parameters for your actual workload.

Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview vs Mistral: Mistral Medium 3.5: Summary

When comparing Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview and Mistral: Mistral Medium 3.5 for API cost, the right choice depends on your workload's token profile, required features, and tolerance for latency. Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview offers lower total cost at standard usage volumes (1,000 input + 500 output tokens per request at 100,000 requests/month) at $200.00/month, compared to $525.00/month for Mistral: Mistral Medium 3.5.

Both models are priced in USD per million tokens, the standard unit across all major AI API providers. Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview charges $0.50/M for input tokens and $3.00/M for output tokens. Mistral: Mistral Medium 3.5 charges $1.50/M input and $7.50/M output. If your workload is output-heavy (more tokens generated than consumed as input), the model with the lower output price compounds cost savings significantly at scale.

Context window capacity differs between the two: Mistral: Mistral Medium 3.5 supports up to 262,144 tokens in a single request, versus 65,536 tokens for Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview. A larger context window is essential for document summarization, large codebase analysis, and multi-document retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) applications.

Use the interactive calculator at the top of this page to enter your actual token usage and monthly request volume for a precise cost comparison tailored to your workload. Adjust for batch API discounts and prompt caching to find the most cost-effective option for your specific deployment.

Explore other model comparisons from the same providers or performance tiers.

Related Provider Pages

View complete pricing tables and model lineups for the providers behind these models.

Relevant Use Cases

See cost recommendations for workloads where Gemini 3.1 Flash Image Preview or Mistral: Mistral Medium 3.5 is recommended.