Skip to main content

Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Gemini 3.1 Pro: API Cost Comparison

Compare the API pricing, context windows, features, and real-world cost projections for Gemini 2.5 Pro (Google) and Gemini 3.1 Pro (Google). Use the interactive calculator below to compute your exact monthly cost based on your token usage and request volume.

Prices verified Mar 24, 2026

Interactive Cost Calculator

GoogleGemini 2.5 ProGoogleGemini 3.1 Pro

Fills in typical token counts for a workload type

Tokens in each prompt sent to the model

Tokens generated in each response

Total API calls per month

Showing costs for 2 models. Cheapest: Gemini 2.5 Pro at $62.50/month.

Cheapest: Gemini 2.5 Pro at $62.50/mo — save 21.9% vs Gemini 3.1 Pro
Alert
BestGemini 2.5 Pro
Google$62.50$0.006250$12.50$50.0021.9%Alerts coming soon
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Google$80.00$0.008000$20.00$60.00Alerts coming soon

Monthly Cost Comparison

Price Comparison at a Glance

All prices are in USD per 1 million tokens ($/M tokens). Lower is cheaper.

Pricing TypeGemini 2.5 ProGemini 3.1 ProCheaper
Input (standard)$1.25/M$2.00/MGemini 2.5 Pro
Output$10.00/M$12.00/MGemini 2.5 Pro
Cached input$0.13/M$0.20/MGemini 2.5 Pro
Batch input$0.63/M$1.00/MGemini 2.5 Pro
Batch output$5.00/M$6.00/MGemini 2.5 Pro

Prices last verified: 2026-03-08 – 2026-03-24

Cost Breakdown by Usage Volume

Estimated monthly costs at different request volumes, assuming 1,000 input tokens and 500 output tokens per request. Adjust in the calculator above for your specific use case.

VolumeGemini 2.5 ProMonthlyGemini 3.1 ProMonthlyGemini 2.5 ProPer requestGemini 3.1 ProPer request
1K requests/mo$6.25$8.00$0.006250$0.008000
10K requests/mo$62.50$80.00$0.006250$0.008000
100K requests/mo$625.00$800.00$0.006250$0.008000
1M requests/mo$6,250.00$8,000.00$0.006250$0.008000

Green values indicate the lower-cost option at each volume tier. Cost per request is calculated at 1,000 input + 500 output tokens using standard (non-batch, non-cached) pricing.

Price History

Input price per 1M tokens

When to Choose Gemini 2.5 Pro

by Google

  • Document summarization
  • RAG / Semantic search
  • Code generation

Input / 1M tokens

$1.25/M

Output / 1M tokens

$10.00/M

Context window

1,048,576

Tier

premium

When to Choose Gemini 3.1 Pro

by Google

  • Document summarization
  • RAG / Semantic search
  • Code generation

Input / 1M tokens

$2.00/M

Output / 1M tokens

$12.00/M

Context window

2,097,152

Tier

premium

Key Differences Beyond Price

Cost is only one factor in choosing an AI model. Context window size, rate limits, supported features, and latency all affect whether a model fits your use case.

CapabilityGemini 2.5 ProGemini 3.1 Pro
Context window1,048,576 tokens2,097,152 tokens
Max output tokens65,536 tokens65,536 tokens
Performance tierPremiumPremium
Vision / image inputYesYes
Function callingYesYes
JSON modeYesYes
Prompt cachingYesYes
Batch API (50% discount)YesYes
Extended reasoningYesYes
Fine-tuningNoNo
Rate limit (req/min)1,0001,000

Gemini 2.5 Pro notes

Tiered pricing: prompts over 200K tokens billed at $2.50 input / $15.00 output. Thinking tokens available.

Gemini 3.1 Pro notes

Preview model. Tiered pricing: prompts over 200K tokens billed at $4.00 input / $18.00 output.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Gemini 2.5 Pro cheaper than Gemini 3.1 Pro?

At standard usage (1,000 input tokens, 500 output tokens, 100,000 requests/month), Gemini 2.5 Pro costs $625.00/month versus $800.00/month for Gemini 3.1 Pro — a 22% saving. Your actual savings will vary based on your token profile; output-heavy workloads amplify differences in output pricing.

Which model has a larger context window, Gemini 2.5 Pro or Gemini 3.1 Pro?

Gemini 3.1 Pro has a larger context window at 2,097,152 tokens, compared to 1,048,576 tokens for Gemini 2.5 Pro. A larger context window is important for processing long documents, multi-turn conversations, or large codebases without truncation.

Do Gemini 2.5 Pro and Gemini 3.1 Pro support the Batch API?

Yes — both Gemini 2.5 Pro and Gemini 3.1 Pro support batch API processing, which offers a 50% discount on input and output costs in exchange for up to 24-hour turnaround. Ideal for offline workloads like bulk document processing or nightly classification pipelines.

Which model offers better prompt caching?

Both Gemini 2.5 Pro and Gemini 3.1 Pro support prompt caching. Gemini 2.5 Pro caches repeated input at $0.13/M (vs $1.25/M standard), while Gemini 3.1 Pro caches at $0.20/M (vs $2.00/M standard). For workloads with large, repeated system prompts or document context, caching can reduce effective input costs by 60–90%.

What are the best use cases for Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Gemini 3.1 Pro?

Both models are well-suited for Document summarization, RAG / Semantic search, Code generation. Gemini 2.5 Pro is particularly strong for overlapping tasks. Gemini 3.1 Pro is favored for similar workflows. At the same quality level, the lower-cost model is usually preferable; use this page's calculator to compare total monthly spend at your volume.

What is the cost per request for Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Gemini 3.1 Pro?

At 1,000 input tokens and 500 output tokens per request — a typical conversational workload — Gemini 2.5 Pro costs $0.006250 per request and Gemini 3.1 Pro costs $0.008000 per request. At 100,000 requests/month, that translates to $625.00 and $800.00 respectively. Use the interactive calculator to adjust these parameters for your actual workload.

Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Gemini 3.1 Pro: Summary

When comparing Gemini 2.5 Pro and Gemini 3.1 Pro for API cost, the right choice depends on your workload's token profile, required features, and tolerance for latency. Gemini 2.5 Pro offers lower total cost at standard usage volumes (1,000 input + 500 output tokens per request at 100,000 requests/month) at $625.00/month, compared to $800.00/month for Gemini 3.1 Pro.

Both models are priced in USD per million tokens, the standard unit across all major AI API providers. Gemini 2.5 Pro charges $1.25/M for input tokens and $10.00/M for output tokens. Gemini 3.1 Pro charges $2.00/M input and $12.00/M output. If your workload is output-heavy (more tokens generated than consumed as input), the model with the lower output price compounds cost savings significantly at scale.

Prompt caching is supported by both models. For workloads with large, repeated system prompts or document context — such as RAG pipelines or multi-turn conversations with a fixed knowledge base — prompt caching can reduce effective input costs by 60–90%, which may change the cost ranking between these two models at your specific usage pattern.

Context window capacity differs between the two: Gemini 3.1 Pro supports up to 2,097,152 tokens in a single request, versus 1,048,576 tokens for Gemini 2.5 Pro. A larger context window is essential for document summarization, large codebase analysis, and multi-document retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) applications.

Use the interactive calculator at the top of this page to enter your actual token usage and monthly request volume for a precise cost comparison tailored to your workload. Adjust for batch API discounts and prompt caching to find the most cost-effective option for your specific deployment.

Explore other model comparisons from the same providers or performance tiers.

Related Provider Pages

View complete pricing tables and model lineups for the providers behind these models.

Relevant Use Cases

See cost recommendations for workloads where Gemini 2.5 Pro or Gemini 3.1 Pro is recommended.