Skip to main content

Gemini 2.0 Flash vs Llama 4 Scout (Fireworks): API Cost Comparison

Compare the API pricing, context windows, features, and real-world cost projections for Gemini 2.0 Flash (Google) and Llama 4 Scout (Fireworks) (Fireworks AI). Use the interactive calculator below to compute your exact monthly cost based on your token usage and request volume.

Prices verified Mar 24, 2026

Interactive Cost Calculator

GoogleGemini 2.0 FlashFireworks AILlama 4 Scout (Fireworks)

Fills in typical token counts for a workload type

Tokens in each prompt sent to the model

Tokens generated in each response

Total API calls per month

Showing costs for 2 models. Cheapest: Gemini 2.0 Flash at $3.00/month.

Cheapest: Gemini 2.0 Flash at $3.00/mo
Alert
BestGemini 2.0 Flash
Google$3.00$0.000300$1.00$2.00Alerts coming soon
Llama 4 Scout (Fireworks)
Fireworks AI$3.00$0.000300$2.00$1.00Alerts coming soon

Monthly Cost Comparison

Price Comparison at a Glance

All prices are in USD per 1 million tokens ($/M tokens). Lower is cheaper.

Pricing TypeGemini 2.0 FlashLlama 4 Scout (Fireworks)Cheaper
Input (standard)$0.10/M$0.20/MGemini 2.0 Flash
Output$0.40/M$0.20/MLlama 4 Scout (Fireworks)
Cached input$0.03/M$0.10/MGemini 2.0 Flash
Batch input$0.05/M$0.10/MGemini 2.0 Flash
Batch output$0.20/M$0.10/MLlama 4 Scout (Fireworks)

Prices last verified: 2026-03-10 – 2026-03-24

Cost Breakdown by Usage Volume

Estimated monthly costs at different request volumes, assuming 1,000 input tokens and 500 output tokens per request. Adjust in the calculator above for your specific use case.

VolumeGemini 2.0 FlashMonthlyLlama 4 Scout (Fireworks)MonthlyGemini 2.0 FlashPer requestLlama 4 Scout (Fireworks)Per request
1K requests/mo$0.30$0.30$0.000300$0.000300
10K requests/mo$3.00$3.00$0.000300$0.000300
100K requests/mo$30.00$30.00$0.000300$0.000300
1M requests/mo$300.00$300.00$0.000300$0.000300

Green values indicate the lower-cost option at each volume tier. Cost per request is calculated at 1,000 input + 500 output tokens using standard (non-batch, non-cached) pricing.

Price History

Input price per 1M tokens

When to Choose Gemini 2.0 Flash

by Google

  • General chatbot
  • Customer support
  • Text classification

Input / 1M tokens

$0.10/M

Output / 1M tokens

$0.40/M

Context window

1,048,576

Tier

mid

When to Choose Llama 4 Scout (Fireworks)

by Fireworks AI

  • Customer support
  • RAG / Semantic search
  • General chatbot

Input / 1M tokens

$0.20/M

Output / 1M tokens

$0.20/M

Context window

10,000,000

Tier

budget

Key Differences Beyond Price

Cost is only one factor in choosing an AI model. Context window size, rate limits, supported features, and latency all affect whether a model fits your use case.

CapabilityGemini 2.0 FlashLlama 4 Scout (Fireworks)
Context window1,048,576 tokens10,000,000 tokens
Max output tokens8,192 tokens16,384 tokens
Performance tierMidBudget
Vision / image inputYesYes
Function callingYesYes
JSON modeYesYes
Prompt cachingYesYes
Batch API (50% discount)YesYes
Extended reasoningNoNo
Fine-tuningNoNo
Rate limit (req/min)4,000Not published

Gemini 2.0 Flash notes

Supports real-time streaming, image generation, and native audio I/O.

Llama 4 Scout (Fireworks) notes

Fireworks serverless pricing. Cached input 50% discount. Batch inference at 50% of serverless rates. 10M context window.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Gemini 2.0 Flash cheaper than Llama 4 Scout (Fireworks)?

Gemini 2.0 Flash and Llama 4 Scout (Fireworks) cost the same at standard usage (1,000 input + 500 output tokens, 100K requests/month): $30.00/month each. For different token ratios, use the calculator above.

Which model has a larger context window, Gemini 2.0 Flash or Llama 4 Scout (Fireworks)?

Llama 4 Scout (Fireworks) has a larger context window at 10,000,000 tokens, compared to 1,048,576 tokens for Gemini 2.0 Flash. A larger context window is important for processing long documents, multi-turn conversations, or large codebases without truncation.

Do Gemini 2.0 Flash and Llama 4 Scout (Fireworks) support the Batch API?

Yes — both Gemini 2.0 Flash and Llama 4 Scout (Fireworks) support batch API processing, which offers a 50% discount on input and output costs in exchange for up to 24-hour turnaround. Ideal for offline workloads like bulk document processing or nightly classification pipelines.

Which model offers better prompt caching?

Both Gemini 2.0 Flash and Llama 4 Scout (Fireworks) support prompt caching. Gemini 2.0 Flash caches repeated input at $0.03/M (vs $0.10/M standard), while Llama 4 Scout (Fireworks) caches at $0.10/M (vs $0.20/M standard). For workloads with large, repeated system prompts or document context, caching can reduce effective input costs by 60–90%.

What are the best use cases for Gemini 2.0 Flash vs Llama 4 Scout (Fireworks)?

Both models are well-suited for General chatbot, Customer support. Gemini 2.0 Flash is particularly strong for Text classification. Llama 4 Scout (Fireworks) is favored for RAG / Semantic search. At the same quality level, the lower-cost model is usually preferable; use this page's calculator to compare total monthly spend at your volume.

What is the cost per request for Gemini 2.0 Flash vs Llama 4 Scout (Fireworks)?

At 1,000 input tokens and 500 output tokens per request — a typical conversational workload — Gemini 2.0 Flash costs $0.000300 per request and Llama 4 Scout (Fireworks) costs $0.000300 per request. At 100,000 requests/month, that translates to $30.00 and $30.00 respectively. Use the interactive calculator to adjust these parameters for your actual workload.

Gemini 2.0 Flash vs Llama 4 Scout (Fireworks): Summary

When comparing Gemini 2.0 Flash and Llama 4 Scout (Fireworks) for API cost, the right choice depends on your workload's token profile, required features, and tolerance for latency. Both models cost the same at standard usage volumes (1,000 input + 500 output tokens per request at 100,000 requests/month) at $30.00/month.

Both models are priced in USD per million tokens, the standard unit across all major AI API providers. Gemini 2.0 Flash charges $0.10/M for input tokens and $0.40/M for output tokens. Llama 4 Scout (Fireworks) charges $0.20/M input and $0.20/M output. If your workload is output-heavy (more tokens generated than consumed as input), the model with the lower output price compounds cost savings significantly at scale.

Prompt caching is supported by both models. For workloads with large, repeated system prompts or document context — such as RAG pipelines or multi-turn conversations with a fixed knowledge base — prompt caching can reduce effective input costs by 60–90%, which may change the cost ranking between these two models at your specific usage pattern.

Context window capacity differs between the two: Llama 4 Scout (Fireworks) supports up to 10,000,000 tokens in a single request, versus 1,048,576 tokens for Gemini 2.0 Flash. A larger context window is essential for document summarization, large codebase analysis, and multi-document retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) applications.

Use the interactive calculator at the top of this page to enter your actual token usage and monthly request volume for a precise cost comparison tailored to your workload. Adjust for batch API discounts and prompt caching to find the most cost-effective option for your specific deployment.

Explore other model comparisons from the same providers or performance tiers.

Related Provider Pages

View complete pricing tables and model lineups for the providers behind these models.

Relevant Use Cases

See cost recommendations for workloads where Gemini 2.0 Flash or Llama 4 Scout (Fireworks) is recommended.