Skip to main content

DeepSeek V3.2 (Bedrock) vs Llama 3.1 8B (Cerebras): API Cost Comparison

Compare the API pricing, context windows, features, and real-world cost projections for DeepSeek V3.2 (Bedrock) (AWS Bedrock) and Llama 3.1 8B (Cerebras) (Cerebras). Use the interactive calculator below to compute your exact monthly cost based on your token usage and request volume.

Prices verified Mar 11, 2026

Interactive Cost Calculator

AWS BedrockDeepSeek V3.2 (Bedrock)CerebrasLlama 3.1 8B (Cerebras)

Fills in typical token counts for a workload type

Tokens in each prompt sent to the model

Tokens generated in each response

Total API calls per month

Showing costs for 2 models. Cheapest: Llama 3.1 8B (Cerebras) at $1.50/month.

Cheapest: Llama 3.1 8B (Cerebras) at $1.50/mo — save 90.3% vs DeepSeek V3.2 (Bedrock)
Alert
BestLlama 3.1 8B (Cerebras)
Cerebras$1.50$0.000150$1.00$0.5090.3%Alerts coming soon
DeepSeek V3.2 (Bedrock)
AWS Bedrock$15.45$0.001545$6.20$9.25Alerts coming soon

Monthly Cost Comparison

Price Comparison at a Glance

All prices are in USD per 1 million tokens ($/M tokens). Lower is cheaper.

Pricing TypeDeepSeek V3.2 (Bedrock)Llama 3.1 8B (Cerebras)Cheaper
Input (standard)$0.62/M$0.10/MLlama 3.1 8B (Cerebras)
Output$1.85/M$0.10/MLlama 3.1 8B (Cerebras)

Prices last verified: 2026-03-10 – 2026-03-11

Cost Breakdown by Usage Volume

Estimated monthly costs at different request volumes, assuming 1,000 input tokens and 500 output tokens per request. Adjust in the calculator above for your specific use case.

VolumeDeepSeek V3.2 (Bedrock)MonthlyLlama 3.1 8B (Cerebras)MonthlyDeepSeek V3.2 (Bedrock)Per requestLlama 3.1 8B (Cerebras)Per request
1K requests/mo$1.54$0.15$0.001545$0.000150
10K requests/mo$15.45$1.50$0.001545$0.000150
100K requests/mo$154.50$15.00$0.001545$0.000150
1M requests/mo$1,545.00$150.00$0.001545$0.000150

Green values indicate the lower-cost option at each volume tier. Cost per request is calculated at 1,000 input + 500 output tokens using standard (non-batch, non-cached) pricing.

Price History

Input price per 1M tokens

When to Choose DeepSeek V3.2 (Bedrock)

by AWS Bedrock

  • Code generation
  • Summarization
  • General chatbot

Input / 1M tokens

$0.62/M

Output / 1M tokens

$1.85/M

Context window

128,000

Tier

mid

When to Choose Llama 3.1 8B (Cerebras)

by Cerebras

  • Customer support
  • Text classification
  • General chatbot

Input / 1M tokens

$0.10/M

Output / 1M tokens

$0.10/M

Context window

128,000

Tier

budget

Key Differences Beyond Price

Cost is only one factor in choosing an AI model. Context window size, rate limits, supported features, and latency all affect whether a model fits your use case.

CapabilityDeepSeek V3.2 (Bedrock)Llama 3.1 8B (Cerebras)
Context window128,000 tokens128,000 tokens
Max output tokens8,192 tokens8,192 tokens
Performance tierMidBudget
Vision / image inputNoNo
Function callingYesYes
JSON modeYesYes
Prompt cachingNoNo
Batch API (50% discount)NoNo
Extended reasoningNoNo
Fine-tuningNoNo

DeepSeek V3.2 (Bedrock) notes

DeepSeek V3.2 via AWS Bedrock. Excellent cost/performance ratio for coding and reasoning tasks, with AWS compliance and security guarantees.

Llama 3.1 8B (Cerebras) notes

Cerebras wafer-scale inference: ~2,200 tokens/sec — roughly 20x faster than GPU providers. Ideal for latency-sensitive real-time applications.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is DeepSeek V3.2 (Bedrock) cheaper than Llama 3.1 8B (Cerebras)?

At standard usage (1,000 input tokens, 500 output tokens, 100,000 requests/month), Llama 3.1 8B (Cerebras) costs $15.00/month versus $154.50/month for DeepSeek V3.2 (Bedrock) — a 90% saving. Your actual savings will vary based on your token profile; output-heavy workloads amplify differences in output pricing.

Which model has a larger context window, DeepSeek V3.2 (Bedrock) or Llama 3.1 8B (Cerebras)?

Both DeepSeek V3.2 (Bedrock) and Llama 3.1 8B (Cerebras) have the same context window: 128,000 tokens.

Do DeepSeek V3.2 (Bedrock) and Llama 3.1 8B (Cerebras) support the Batch API?

Neither DeepSeek V3.2 (Bedrock) nor Llama 3.1 8B (Cerebras) currently supports a batch API with discounted pricing. For batch-eligible alternatives, consider models from OpenAI, Anthropic, or Google that include batch API support.

Which model offers better prompt caching?

Neither DeepSeek V3.2 (Bedrock) nor Llama 3.1 8B (Cerebras) currently supports prompt caching. For prompt-caching capable alternatives, consider Claude models from Anthropic or GPT-4o from OpenAI.

What are the best use cases for DeepSeek V3.2 (Bedrock) vs Llama 3.1 8B (Cerebras)?

Both models are well-suited for General chatbot. DeepSeek V3.2 (Bedrock) is particularly strong for Code generation, Summarization. Llama 3.1 8B (Cerebras) is favored for Customer support, Text classification. At the same quality level, the lower-cost model is usually preferable; use this page's calculator to compare total monthly spend at your volume.

What is the cost per request for DeepSeek V3.2 (Bedrock) vs Llama 3.1 8B (Cerebras)?

At 1,000 input tokens and 500 output tokens per request — a typical conversational workload — DeepSeek V3.2 (Bedrock) costs $0.001545 per request and Llama 3.1 8B (Cerebras) costs $0.000150 per request. At 100,000 requests/month, that translates to $154.50 and $15.00 respectively. Use the interactive calculator to adjust these parameters for your actual workload.

DeepSeek V3.2 (Bedrock) vs Llama 3.1 8B (Cerebras): Summary

When comparing DeepSeek V3.2 (Bedrock) and Llama 3.1 8B (Cerebras) for API cost, the right choice depends on your workload's token profile, required features, and tolerance for latency. Llama 3.1 8B (Cerebras) offers lower total cost at standard usage volumes (1,000 input + 500 output tokens per request at 100,000 requests/month) at $15.00/month, compared to $154.50/month for DeepSeek V3.2 (Bedrock).

Both models are priced in USD per million tokens, the standard unit across all major AI API providers. DeepSeek V3.2 (Bedrock) charges $0.62/M for input tokens and $1.85/M for output tokens. Llama 3.1 8B (Cerebras) charges $0.10/M input and $0.10/M output. If your workload is output-heavy (more tokens generated than consumed as input), the model with the lower output price compounds cost savings significantly at scale.

Context window capacity differs between the two: Both models support 128,000 tokens per request. A larger context window is essential for document summarization, large codebase analysis, and multi-document retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) applications.

Use the interactive calculator at the top of this page to enter your actual token usage and monthly request volume for a precise cost comparison tailored to your workload. Adjust for batch API discounts and prompt caching to find the most cost-effective option for your specific deployment.

Explore other model comparisons from the same providers or performance tiers.

Related Provider Pages

View complete pricing tables and model lineups for the providers behind these models.

Relevant Use Cases

See cost recommendations for workloads where DeepSeek V3.2 (Bedrock) or Llama 3.1 8B (Cerebras) is recommended.