Skip to main content

Command R+ vs DeepSeek V3.1 (Fireworks): API Cost Comparison

Compare the API pricing, context windows, features, and real-world cost projections for Command R+ (Cohere) and DeepSeek V3.1 (Fireworks) (Fireworks AI). Use the interactive calculator below to compute your exact monthly cost based on your token usage and request volume.

Prices verified Mar 10, 2026

Interactive Cost Calculator

CohereCommand R+Fireworks AIDeepSeek V3.1 (Fireworks)

Fills in typical token counts for a workload type

Tokens in each prompt sent to the model

Tokens generated in each response

Total API calls per month

Showing costs for 2 models. Cheapest: DeepSeek V3.1 (Fireworks) at $14.00/month.

Cheapest: DeepSeek V3.1 (Fireworks) at $14.00/mo — save 81.3% vs Command R+
Alert
BestDeepSeek V3.1 (Fireworks)
Fireworks AI$14.00$0.001400$5.60$8.4081.3%Alerts coming soon
Command R+
Cohere$75.00$0.007500$25.00$50.00Alerts coming soon

Monthly Cost Comparison

Price Comparison at a Glance

All prices are in USD per 1 million tokens ($/M tokens). Lower is cheaper.

Pricing TypeCommand R+DeepSeek V3.1 (Fireworks)Cheaper
Input (standard)$2.50/M$0.56/MDeepSeek V3.1 (Fireworks)
Output$10.00/M$1.68/MDeepSeek V3.1 (Fireworks)
Cached inputN/A$0.28/M
Batch inputN/A$0.28/M
Batch outputN/A$0.84/M

Prices last verified: 2026-03-06 – 2026-03-10

Cost Breakdown by Usage Volume

Estimated monthly costs at different request volumes, assuming 1,000 input tokens and 500 output tokens per request. Adjust in the calculator above for your specific use case.

VolumeCommand R+MonthlyDeepSeek V3.1 (Fireworks)MonthlyCommand R+Per requestDeepSeek V3.1 (Fireworks)Per request
1K requests/mo$7.50$1.40$0.007500$0.001400
10K requests/mo$75.00$14.00$0.007500$0.001400
100K requests/mo$750.00$140.00$0.007500$0.001400
1M requests/mo$7,500.00$1,400.00$0.007500$0.001400

Green values indicate the lower-cost option at each volume tier. Cost per request is calculated at 1,000 input + 500 output tokens using standard (non-batch, non-cached) pricing.

Price History

Input price per 1M tokens

When to Choose Command R+

by Cohere

  • RAG / Semantic search
  • Document summarization
  • Data extraction

Input / 1M tokens

$2.50/M

Output / 1M tokens

$10.00/M

Context window

128,000

Tier

premium

When to Choose DeepSeek V3.1 (Fireworks)

by Fireworks AI

  • Code generation
  • Document summarization
  • RAG / Semantic search

Input / 1M tokens

$0.56/M

Output / 1M tokens

$1.68/M

Context window

163,840

Tier

mid

Key Differences Beyond Price

Cost is only one factor in choosing an AI model. Context window size, rate limits, supported features, and latency all affect whether a model fits your use case.

CapabilityCommand R+DeepSeek V3.1 (Fireworks)
Context window128,000 tokens163,840 tokens
Max output tokens4,096 tokens16,384 tokens
Performance tierPremiumMid
Vision / image inputNoNo
Function callingYesYes
JSON modeYesYes
Prompt cachingNoYes
Batch API (50% discount)NoYes
Extended reasoningNoNo
Fine-tuningNoNo

Command R+ notes

Optimized for RAG with built-in document grounding and citation generation.

DeepSeek V3.1 (Fireworks) notes

Fireworks serverless pricing. Cached input 50% discount. Batch inference at 50% of serverless rates.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Command R+ cheaper than DeepSeek V3.1 (Fireworks)?

At standard usage (1,000 input tokens, 500 output tokens, 100,000 requests/month), DeepSeek V3.1 (Fireworks) costs $140.00/month versus $750.00/month for Command R+ — a 81% saving. Your actual savings will vary based on your token profile; output-heavy workloads amplify differences in output pricing.

Which model has a larger context window, Command R+ or DeepSeek V3.1 (Fireworks)?

DeepSeek V3.1 (Fireworks) has a larger context window at 163,840 tokens, compared to 128,000 tokens for Command R+. A larger context window is important for processing long documents, multi-turn conversations, or large codebases without truncation.

Do Command R+ and DeepSeek V3.1 (Fireworks) support the Batch API?

DeepSeek V3.1 (Fireworks) supports the Batch API (50% discount for async processing), while Command R+ does not. If your workload tolerates up to 24-hour latency, routing to DeepSeek V3.1 (Fireworks) with batch pricing could significantly cut costs versus Command R+'s standard rate.

Which model offers better prompt caching?

DeepSeek V3.1 (Fireworks) supports prompt caching at $0.28/M for cached input, while Command R+ does not offer prompt caching. For RAG applications or chatbots with large, repeated context, DeepSeek V3.1 (Fireworks)'s caching capability can substantially reduce effective costs.

What are the best use cases for Command R+ vs DeepSeek V3.1 (Fireworks)?

Both models are well-suited for RAG / Semantic search, Document summarization. Command R+ is particularly strong for Data extraction. DeepSeek V3.1 (Fireworks) is favored for Code generation. At the same quality level, the lower-cost model is usually preferable; use this page's calculator to compare total monthly spend at your volume.

What is the cost per request for Command R+ vs DeepSeek V3.1 (Fireworks)?

At 1,000 input tokens and 500 output tokens per request — a typical conversational workload — Command R+ costs $0.007500 per request and DeepSeek V3.1 (Fireworks) costs $0.001400 per request. At 100,000 requests/month, that translates to $750.00 and $140.00 respectively. Use the interactive calculator to adjust these parameters for your actual workload.

Command R+ vs DeepSeek V3.1 (Fireworks): Summary

When comparing Command R+ and DeepSeek V3.1 (Fireworks) for API cost, the right choice depends on your workload's token profile, required features, and tolerance for latency. DeepSeek V3.1 (Fireworks) offers lower total cost at standard usage volumes (1,000 input + 500 output tokens per request at 100,000 requests/month) at $140.00/month, compared to $750.00/month for Command R+.

Both models are priced in USD per million tokens, the standard unit across all major AI API providers. Command R+ charges $2.50/M for input tokens and $10.00/M for output tokens. DeepSeek V3.1 (Fireworks) charges $0.56/M input and $1.68/M output. If your workload is output-heavy (more tokens generated than consumed as input), the model with the lower output price compounds cost savings significantly at scale.

Prompt caching is supported by DeepSeek V3.1 (Fireworks) but not Command R+. For workloads with large, repeated system prompts or document context — such as RAG pipelines or multi-turn conversations with a fixed knowledge base — prompt caching can reduce effective input costs by 60–90%, which may change the cost ranking between these two models at your specific usage pattern.

Context window capacity differs between the two: DeepSeek V3.1 (Fireworks) supports up to 163,840 tokens in a single request, versus 128,000 tokens for Command R+. A larger context window is essential for document summarization, large codebase analysis, and multi-document retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) applications.

Use the interactive calculator at the top of this page to enter your actual token usage and monthly request volume for a precise cost comparison tailored to your workload. Adjust for batch API discounts and prompt caching to find the most cost-effective option for your specific deployment.

Explore other model comparisons from the same providers or performance tiers.

Related Provider Pages

View complete pricing tables and model lineups for the providers behind these models.

Relevant Use Cases

See cost recommendations for workloads where Command R+ or DeepSeek V3.1 (Fireworks) is recommended.