Skip to main content

Claude Sonnet 4 vs Claude Sonnet 4.5: API Cost Comparison

Compare the API pricing, context windows, features, and real-world cost projections for Claude Sonnet 4 (Anthropic) and Claude Sonnet 4.5 (Anthropic). Use the interactive calculator below to compute your exact monthly cost based on your token usage and request volume.

Prices verified Mar 24, 2026

Interactive Cost Calculator

AnthropicClaude Sonnet 4AnthropicClaude Sonnet 4.5

Fills in typical token counts for a workload type

Tokens in each prompt sent to the model

Tokens generated in each response

Total API calls per month

Showing costs for 2 models. Cheapest: Claude Sonnet 4 at $105.00/month.

Cheapest: Claude Sonnet 4 at $105.00/mo
Alert
BestClaude Sonnet 4
Anthropic$105.00$0.010500$30.00$75.00Alerts coming soon
Claude Sonnet 4.5
Anthropic$105.00$0.010500$30.00$75.00Alerts coming soon

Monthly Cost Comparison

Price Comparison at a Glance

All prices are in USD per 1 million tokens ($/M tokens). Lower is cheaper.

Pricing TypeClaude Sonnet 4Claude Sonnet 4.5Cheaper
Input (standard)$3.00/M$3.00/M
Output$15.00/M$15.00/M
Cached input$0.30/M$0.30/M
Batch input$1.50/M$1.50/M
Batch output$7.50/M$7.50/M

Prices last verified: 2026-03-24

Cost Breakdown by Usage Volume

Estimated monthly costs at different request volumes, assuming 1,000 input tokens and 500 output tokens per request. Adjust in the calculator above for your specific use case.

VolumeClaude Sonnet 4MonthlyClaude Sonnet 4.5MonthlyClaude Sonnet 4Per requestClaude Sonnet 4.5Per request
1K requests/mo$10.50$10.50$0.010500$0.010500
10K requests/mo$105.00$105.00$0.010500$0.010500
100K requests/mo$1,050.00$1,050.00$0.010500$0.010500
1M requests/mo$10,500.00$10,500.00$0.010500$0.010500

Green values indicate the lower-cost option at each volume tier. Cost per request is calculated at 1,000 input + 500 output tokens using standard (non-batch, non-cached) pricing.

Price History

Input price per 1M tokens

When to Choose Claude Sonnet 4

by Anthropic

  • Code generation
  • Content & copywriting
  • RAG / Semantic search

Input / 1M tokens

$3.00/M

Output / 1M tokens

$15.00/M

Context window

200,000

Tier

mid

When to Choose Claude Sonnet 4.5

by Anthropic

  • Code generation
  • Content & copywriting
  • RAG / Semantic search

Input / 1M tokens

$3.00/M

Output / 1M tokens

$15.00/M

Context window

200,000

Tier

mid

Key Differences Beyond Price

Cost is only one factor in choosing an AI model. Context window size, rate limits, supported features, and latency all affect whether a model fits your use case.

CapabilityClaude Sonnet 4Claude Sonnet 4.5
Context window200,000 tokens200,000 tokens
Max output tokens64,000 tokens64,000 tokens
Performance tierMidMid
Vision / image inputYesYes
Function callingYesYes
JSON modeYesYes
Prompt cachingYesYes
Batch API (50% discount)YesYes
Extended reasoningYesYes
Fine-tuningNoNo
Rate limit (req/min)4,0004,000

Claude Sonnet 4 notes

Extended thinking mode available for complex reasoning tasks. Strong coding benchmark scores.

Claude Sonnet 4.5 notes

Extended thinking mode available. Strong coding benchmark scores.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Claude Sonnet 4 cheaper than Claude Sonnet 4.5?

Claude Sonnet 4 and Claude Sonnet 4.5 cost the same at standard usage (1,000 input + 500 output tokens, 100K requests/month): $1,050.00/month each. For different token ratios, use the calculator above.

Which model has a larger context window, Claude Sonnet 4 or Claude Sonnet 4.5?

Both Claude Sonnet 4 and Claude Sonnet 4.5 have the same context window: 200,000 tokens.

Do Claude Sonnet 4 and Claude Sonnet 4.5 support the Batch API?

Yes — both Claude Sonnet 4 and Claude Sonnet 4.5 support batch API processing, which offers a 50% discount on input and output costs in exchange for up to 24-hour turnaround. Ideal for offline workloads like bulk document processing or nightly classification pipelines.

Which model offers better prompt caching?

Both Claude Sonnet 4 and Claude Sonnet 4.5 support prompt caching. Claude Sonnet 4 caches repeated input at $0.30/M (vs $3.00/M standard), while Claude Sonnet 4.5 caches at $0.30/M (vs $3.00/M standard). For workloads with large, repeated system prompts or document context, caching can reduce effective input costs by 60–90%.

What are the best use cases for Claude Sonnet 4 vs Claude Sonnet 4.5?

Both models are well-suited for Code generation, Content & copywriting, RAG / Semantic search. Claude Sonnet 4 is particularly strong for overlapping tasks. Claude Sonnet 4.5 is favored for similar workflows. At the same quality level, the lower-cost model is usually preferable; use this page's calculator to compare total monthly spend at your volume.

What is the cost per request for Claude Sonnet 4 vs Claude Sonnet 4.5?

At 1,000 input tokens and 500 output tokens per request — a typical conversational workload — Claude Sonnet 4 costs $0.010500 per request and Claude Sonnet 4.5 costs $0.010500 per request. At 100,000 requests/month, that translates to $1,050.00 and $1,050.00 respectively. Use the interactive calculator to adjust these parameters for your actual workload.

Claude Sonnet 4 vs Claude Sonnet 4.5: Summary

When comparing Claude Sonnet 4 and Claude Sonnet 4.5 for API cost, the right choice depends on your workload's token profile, required features, and tolerance for latency. Both models cost the same at standard usage volumes (1,000 input + 500 output tokens per request at 100,000 requests/month) at $1,050.00/month.

Both models are priced in USD per million tokens, the standard unit across all major AI API providers. Claude Sonnet 4 charges $3.00/M for input tokens and $15.00/M for output tokens. Claude Sonnet 4.5 charges $3.00/M input and $15.00/M output. If your workload is output-heavy (more tokens generated than consumed as input), the model with the lower output price compounds cost savings significantly at scale.

Prompt caching is supported by both models. For workloads with large, repeated system prompts or document context — such as RAG pipelines or multi-turn conversations with a fixed knowledge base — prompt caching can reduce effective input costs by 60–90%, which may change the cost ranking between these two models at your specific usage pattern.

Context window capacity differs between the two: Both models support 200,000 tokens per request. A larger context window is essential for document summarization, large codebase analysis, and multi-document retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) applications.

Use the interactive calculator at the top of this page to enter your actual token usage and monthly request volume for a precise cost comparison tailored to your workload. Adjust for batch API discounts and prompt caching to find the most cost-effective option for your specific deployment.

Explore other model comparisons from the same providers or performance tiers.

Related Provider Pages

View complete pricing tables and model lineups for the providers behind these models.

Relevant Use Cases

See cost recommendations for workloads where Claude Sonnet 4 or Claude Sonnet 4.5 is recommended.