Skip to main content

Claude Sonnet 4.5 (Bedrock) vs GPT OSS 20B (Fireworks): API Cost Comparison

Compare the API pricing, context windows, features, and real-world cost projections for Claude Sonnet 4.5 (Bedrock) (AWS Bedrock) and GPT OSS 20B (Fireworks) (Fireworks AI). Use the interactive calculator below to compute your exact monthly cost based on your token usage and request volume.

Prices verified Mar 11, 2026

Interactive Cost Calculator

AWS BedrockClaude Sonnet 4.5 (Bedrock)Fireworks AIGPT OSS 20B (Fireworks)

Fills in typical token counts for a workload type

Tokens in each prompt sent to the model

Tokens generated in each response

Total API calls per month

Showing costs for 2 models. Cheapest: GPT OSS 20B (Fireworks) at $2.20/month.

Cheapest: GPT OSS 20B (Fireworks) at $2.20/mo — save 97.9% vs Claude Sonnet 4.5 (Bedrock)
Alert
BestGPT OSS 20B (Fireworks)
Fireworks AI$2.20$0.000220$0.70$1.5097.9%Alerts coming soon
Claude Sonnet 4.5 (Bedrock)
AWS Bedrock$105.00$0.010500$30.00$75.00Alerts coming soon

Monthly Cost Comparison

Price Comparison at a Glance

All prices are in USD per 1 million tokens ($/M tokens). Lower is cheaper.

Pricing TypeClaude Sonnet 4.5 (Bedrock)GPT OSS 20B (Fireworks)Cheaper
Input (standard)$3.00/M$0.07/MGPT OSS 20B (Fireworks)
Output$15.00/M$0.30/MGPT OSS 20B (Fireworks)
Cached inputN/A$0.04/M
Batch inputN/A$0.04/M
Batch outputN/A$0.15/M

Prices last verified: 2026-03-10 – 2026-03-11

Cost Breakdown by Usage Volume

Estimated monthly costs at different request volumes, assuming 1,000 input tokens and 500 output tokens per request. Adjust in the calculator above for your specific use case.

VolumeClaude Sonnet 4.5 (Bedrock)MonthlyGPT OSS 20B (Fireworks)MonthlyClaude Sonnet 4.5 (Bedrock)Per requestGPT OSS 20B (Fireworks)Per request
1K requests/mo$10.50$0.22$0.010500$0.000220
10K requests/mo$105.00$2.20$0.010500$0.000220
100K requests/mo$1,050.00$22.00$0.010500$0.000220
1M requests/mo$10,500.00$220.00$0.010500$0.000220

Green values indicate the lower-cost option at each volume tier. Cost per request is calculated at 1,000 input + 500 output tokens using standard (non-batch, non-cached) pricing.

Price History

Input price per 1M tokens

When to Choose Claude Sonnet 4.5 (Bedrock)

by AWS Bedrock

  • Code generation
  • Content Creation
  • General chatbot

Input / 1M tokens

$3.00/M

Output / 1M tokens

$15.00/M

Context window

200,000

Tier

premium

When to Choose GPT OSS 20B (Fireworks)

by Fireworks AI

  • Customer support
  • Text classification
  • General chatbot

Input / 1M tokens

$0.07/M

Output / 1M tokens

$0.30/M

Context window

131,072

Tier

budget

Key Differences Beyond Price

Cost is only one factor in choosing an AI model. Context window size, rate limits, supported features, and latency all affect whether a model fits your use case.

CapabilityClaude Sonnet 4.5 (Bedrock)GPT OSS 20B (Fireworks)
Context window200,000 tokens131,072 tokens
Max output tokens8,192 tokens16,384 tokens
Performance tierPremiumBudget
Vision / image inputYesNo
Function callingYesYes
JSON modeYesYes
Prompt cachingNoYes
Batch API (50% discount)YesYes
Extended reasoningNoNo
Fine-tuningNoNo

Claude Sonnet 4.5 (Bedrock) notes

Claude Sonnet 4.5 accessed via AWS Bedrock. Pricing matches Anthropic direct. AWS IAM auth, VPC support, and CloudWatch logging available.

GPT OSS 20B (Fireworks) notes

Fireworks serverless pricing. Cached input 50% discount. Batch at 50% of serverless.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Claude Sonnet 4.5 (Bedrock) cheaper than GPT OSS 20B (Fireworks)?

At standard usage (1,000 input tokens, 500 output tokens, 100,000 requests/month), GPT OSS 20B (Fireworks) costs $22.00/month versus $1,050.00/month for Claude Sonnet 4.5 (Bedrock) — a 98% saving. Your actual savings will vary based on your token profile; output-heavy workloads amplify differences in output pricing.

Which model has a larger context window, Claude Sonnet 4.5 (Bedrock) or GPT OSS 20B (Fireworks)?

Claude Sonnet 4.5 (Bedrock) has a larger context window at 200,000 tokens, compared to 131,072 tokens for GPT OSS 20B (Fireworks). A larger context window is important for processing long documents, multi-turn conversations, or large codebases without truncation.

Do Claude Sonnet 4.5 (Bedrock) and GPT OSS 20B (Fireworks) support the Batch API?

Yes — both Claude Sonnet 4.5 (Bedrock) and GPT OSS 20B (Fireworks) support batch API processing, which offers a 50% discount on input and output costs in exchange for up to 24-hour turnaround. Ideal for offline workloads like bulk document processing or nightly classification pipelines.

Which model offers better prompt caching?

GPT OSS 20B (Fireworks) supports prompt caching at $0.04/M for cached input, while Claude Sonnet 4.5 (Bedrock) does not offer prompt caching. For RAG applications or chatbots with large, repeated context, GPT OSS 20B (Fireworks)'s caching capability can substantially reduce effective costs.

What are the best use cases for Claude Sonnet 4.5 (Bedrock) vs GPT OSS 20B (Fireworks)?

Both models are well-suited for General chatbot. Claude Sonnet 4.5 (Bedrock) is particularly strong for Code generation, Content Creation. GPT OSS 20B (Fireworks) is favored for Customer support, Text classification. At the same quality level, the lower-cost model is usually preferable; use this page's calculator to compare total monthly spend at your volume.

What is the cost per request for Claude Sonnet 4.5 (Bedrock) vs GPT OSS 20B (Fireworks)?

At 1,000 input tokens and 500 output tokens per request — a typical conversational workload — Claude Sonnet 4.5 (Bedrock) costs $0.010500 per request and GPT OSS 20B (Fireworks) costs $0.000220 per request. At 100,000 requests/month, that translates to $1,050.00 and $22.00 respectively. Use the interactive calculator to adjust these parameters for your actual workload.

Claude Sonnet 4.5 (Bedrock) vs GPT OSS 20B (Fireworks): Summary

When comparing Claude Sonnet 4.5 (Bedrock) and GPT OSS 20B (Fireworks) for API cost, the right choice depends on your workload's token profile, required features, and tolerance for latency. GPT OSS 20B (Fireworks) offers lower total cost at standard usage volumes (1,000 input + 500 output tokens per request at 100,000 requests/month) at $22.00/month, compared to $1,050.00/month for Claude Sonnet 4.5 (Bedrock).

Both models are priced in USD per million tokens, the standard unit across all major AI API providers. Claude Sonnet 4.5 (Bedrock) charges $3.00/M for input tokens and $15.00/M for output tokens. GPT OSS 20B (Fireworks) charges $0.07/M input and $0.30/M output. If your workload is output-heavy (more tokens generated than consumed as input), the model with the lower output price compounds cost savings significantly at scale.

Prompt caching is supported by GPT OSS 20B (Fireworks) but not Claude Sonnet 4.5 (Bedrock). For workloads with large, repeated system prompts or document context — such as RAG pipelines or multi-turn conversations with a fixed knowledge base — prompt caching can reduce effective input costs by 60–90%, which may change the cost ranking between these two models at your specific usage pattern.

Context window capacity differs between the two: Claude Sonnet 4.5 (Bedrock) supports up to 200,000 tokens in a single request, versus 131,072 tokens for GPT OSS 20B (Fireworks). A larger context window is essential for document summarization, large codebase analysis, and multi-document retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) applications.

Use the interactive calculator at the top of this page to enter your actual token usage and monthly request volume for a precise cost comparison tailored to your workload. Adjust for batch API discounts and prompt caching to find the most cost-effective option for your specific deployment.

Explore other model comparisons from the same providers or performance tiers.

Related Provider Pages

View complete pricing tables and model lineups for the providers behind these models.

Relevant Use Cases

See cost recommendations for workloads where Claude Sonnet 4.5 (Bedrock) or GPT OSS 20B (Fireworks) is recommended.