Skip to main content

Claude Sonnet 4.5 (Bedrock) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: API Cost Comparison

Compare the API pricing, context windows, features, and real-world cost projections for Claude Sonnet 4.5 (Bedrock) (AWS Bedrock) and DeepSeek V4 Flash (DeepSeek). Use the interactive calculator below to compute your exact monthly cost based on your token usage and request volume.

Prices verified Apr 30, 2026

Interactive Cost Calculator

AWS BedrockClaude Sonnet 4.5 (Bedrock)DeepSeekDeepSeek V4 Flash

Fills in typical token counts for a workload type

Tokens in each prompt sent to the model

Tokens generated in each response

Total API calls per month

Showing costs for 2 models. Cheapest: DeepSeek V4 Flash at $2.80/month.

Cheapest: DeepSeek V4 Flash at $2.80/mo — save 97.3% vs Claude Sonnet 4.5 (Bedrock)
Alert
BestDeepSeek V4 Flash
DeepSeek$2.80$0.000280$1.40$1.4097.3%Alerts coming soon
Claude Sonnet 4.5 (Bedrock)
AWS Bedrock$105.00$0.010500$30.00$75.00Alerts coming soon

Monthly Cost Comparison

Price Comparison at a Glance

All prices are in USD per 1 million tokens ($/M tokens). Lower is cheaper.

Pricing TypeClaude Sonnet 4.5 (Bedrock)DeepSeek V4 FlashCheaper
Input (standard)$3.00/M$0.14/MDeepSeek V4 Flash
Output$15.00/M$0.28/MDeepSeek V4 Flash

Prices last verified: 2026-03-11 – 2026-04-30

Cost Breakdown by Usage Volume

Estimated monthly costs at different request volumes, assuming 1,000 input tokens and 500 output tokens per request. Adjust in the calculator above for your specific use case.

VolumeClaude Sonnet 4.5 (Bedrock)MonthlyDeepSeek V4 FlashMonthlyClaude Sonnet 4.5 (Bedrock)Per requestDeepSeek V4 FlashPer request
1K requests/mo$10.50$0.28$0.010500$0.000280
10K requests/mo$105.00$2.80$0.010500$0.000280
100K requests/mo$1,050.00$28.00$0.010500$0.000280
1M requests/mo$10,500.00$280.00$0.010500$0.000280

Green values indicate the lower-cost option at each volume tier. Cost per request is calculated at 1,000 input + 500 output tokens using standard (non-batch, non-cached) pricing.

Price History

Input price per 1M tokens

When to Choose Claude Sonnet 4.5 (Bedrock)

by AWS Bedrock

  • Code generation
  • Content Creation
  • General chatbot

Input / 1M tokens

$3.00/M

Output / 1M tokens

$15.00/M

Context window

200,000

Tier

premium

When to Choose DeepSeek V4 Flash

by DeepSeek

  • General chatbot

Input / 1M tokens

$0.14/M

Output / 1M tokens

$0.28/M

Context window

1,048,576

Tier

budget

Key Differences Beyond Price

Cost is only one factor in choosing an AI model. Context window size, rate limits, supported features, and latency all affect whether a model fits your use case.

CapabilityClaude Sonnet 4.5 (Bedrock)DeepSeek V4 Flash
Context window200,000 tokens1,048,576 tokens
Max output tokens8,192 tokens384,000 tokens
Performance tierPremiumBudget
Vision / image inputYesNo
Function callingYesYes
JSON modeYesYes
Prompt cachingNoNo
Batch API (50% discount)YesNo
Extended reasoningNoYes
Fine-tuningNoNo

Claude Sonnet 4.5 (Bedrock) notes

Claude Sonnet 4.5 accessed via AWS Bedrock. Pricing matches Anthropic direct. AWS IAM auth, VPC support, and CloudWatch logging available.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Claude Sonnet 4.5 (Bedrock) cheaper than DeepSeek V4 Flash?

At standard usage (1,000 input tokens, 500 output tokens, 100,000 requests/month), DeepSeek V4 Flash costs $28.00/month versus $1,050.00/month for Claude Sonnet 4.5 (Bedrock) — a 97% saving. Your actual savings will vary based on your token profile; output-heavy workloads amplify differences in output pricing.

Which model has a larger context window, Claude Sonnet 4.5 (Bedrock) or DeepSeek V4 Flash?

DeepSeek V4 Flash has a larger context window at 1,048,576 tokens, compared to 200,000 tokens for Claude Sonnet 4.5 (Bedrock). A larger context window is important for processing long documents, multi-turn conversations, or large codebases without truncation.

Do Claude Sonnet 4.5 (Bedrock) and DeepSeek V4 Flash support the Batch API?

Claude Sonnet 4.5 (Bedrock) supports the Batch API (50% discount for async processing), while DeepSeek V4 Flash does not. If your workload tolerates up to 24-hour latency, routing to Claude Sonnet 4.5 (Bedrock) with batch pricing could significantly cut costs versus DeepSeek V4 Flash's standard rate.

Which model offers better prompt caching?

Neither Claude Sonnet 4.5 (Bedrock) nor DeepSeek V4 Flash currently supports prompt caching. For prompt-caching capable alternatives, consider Claude models from Anthropic or GPT-4o from OpenAI.

What are the best use cases for Claude Sonnet 4.5 (Bedrock) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash?

Both models are well-suited for General chatbot. Claude Sonnet 4.5 (Bedrock) is particularly strong for Code generation, Content Creation. DeepSeek V4 Flash is favored for similar workflows. At the same quality level, the lower-cost model is usually preferable; use this page's calculator to compare total monthly spend at your volume.

What is the cost per request for Claude Sonnet 4.5 (Bedrock) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash?

At 1,000 input tokens and 500 output tokens per request — a typical conversational workload — Claude Sonnet 4.5 (Bedrock) costs $0.010500 per request and DeepSeek V4 Flash costs $0.000280 per request. At 100,000 requests/month, that translates to $1,050.00 and $28.00 respectively. Use the interactive calculator to adjust these parameters for your actual workload.

Claude Sonnet 4.5 (Bedrock) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash: Summary

When comparing Claude Sonnet 4.5 (Bedrock) and DeepSeek V4 Flash for API cost, the right choice depends on your workload's token profile, required features, and tolerance for latency. DeepSeek V4 Flash offers lower total cost at standard usage volumes (1,000 input + 500 output tokens per request at 100,000 requests/month) at $28.00/month, compared to $1,050.00/month for Claude Sonnet 4.5 (Bedrock).

Both models are priced in USD per million tokens, the standard unit across all major AI API providers. Claude Sonnet 4.5 (Bedrock) charges $3.00/M for input tokens and $15.00/M for output tokens. DeepSeek V4 Flash charges $0.14/M input and $0.28/M output. If your workload is output-heavy (more tokens generated than consumed as input), the model with the lower output price compounds cost savings significantly at scale.

Context window capacity differs between the two: DeepSeek V4 Flash supports up to 1,048,576 tokens in a single request, versus 200,000 tokens for Claude Sonnet 4.5 (Bedrock). A larger context window is essential for document summarization, large codebase analysis, and multi-document retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) applications.

Use the interactive calculator at the top of this page to enter your actual token usage and monthly request volume for a precise cost comparison tailored to your workload. Adjust for batch API discounts and prompt caching to find the most cost-effective option for your specific deployment.

Explore other model comparisons from the same providers or performance tiers.

Related Provider Pages

View complete pricing tables and model lineups for the providers behind these models.

Relevant Use Cases

See cost recommendations for workloads where Claude Sonnet 4.5 (Bedrock) or DeepSeek V4 Flash is recommended.