Skip to main content

Claude Opus 4.6 vs Claude Opus 4.8: API Cost Comparison

Compare the API pricing, context windows, features, and real-world cost projections for Claude Opus 4.6 (Anthropic) and Claude Opus 4.8 (Anthropic). Use the interactive calculator below to compute your exact monthly cost based on your token usage and request volume.

Prices verified Jun 26, 2026

Interactive Cost Calculator

AnthropicClaude Opus 4.6AnthropicClaude Opus 4.8

Fills in typical token counts for a workload type

Tokens in each prompt sent to the model

Tokens generated in each response

Total API calls per month

Showing costs for 2 models. Cheapest: Claude Opus 4.6 at $175.00/month.

Cheapest: Claude Opus 4.6 at $175.00/mo
Alert
BestClaude Opus 4.6
Anthropic$175.00$0.017500$50.00$125.00Alerts coming soon
Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic$175.00$0.017500$50.00$125.00Alerts coming soon

Monthly Cost Comparison

Price Comparison at a Glance

All prices are in USD per 1 million tokens ($/M tokens). Lower is cheaper.

Pricing TypeClaude Opus 4.6Claude Opus 4.8Cheaper
Input (standard)$5.00/M$5.00/M
Output$25.00/M$25.00/M
Cached input$0.50/MN/A
Batch input$2.50/MN/A
Batch output$12.50/MN/A

Prices last verified: 2026-03-24 – 2026-06-26

Cost Breakdown by Usage Volume

Estimated monthly costs at different request volumes, assuming 1,000 input tokens and 500 output tokens per request. Adjust in the calculator above for your specific use case.

VolumeClaude Opus 4.6MonthlyClaude Opus 4.8MonthlyClaude Opus 4.6Per requestClaude Opus 4.8Per request
1K requests/mo$17.50$17.50$0.017500$0.017500
10K requests/mo$175.00$175.00$0.017500$0.017500
100K requests/mo$1,750.00$1,750.00$0.017500$0.017500
1M requests/mo$17,500.00$17,500.00$0.017500$0.017500

Green values indicate the lower-cost option at each volume tier. Cost per request is calculated at 1,000 input + 500 output tokens using standard (non-batch, non-cached) pricing.

Price History

Input price per 1M tokens

When to Choose Claude Opus 4.6

by Anthropic

  • Code generation
  • Document summarization
  • RAG / Semantic search

Input / 1M tokens

$5.00/M

Output / 1M tokens

$25.00/M

Context window

200,000

Tier

premium

When to Choose Claude Opus 4.8

by Anthropic

  • General chatbot

Input / 1M tokens

$5.00/M

Output / 1M tokens

$25.00/M

Context window

1,000,000

Tier

premium

Key Differences Beyond Price

Cost is only one factor in choosing an AI model. Context window size, rate limits, supported features, and latency all affect whether a model fits your use case.

CapabilityClaude Opus 4.6Claude Opus 4.8
Context window200,000 tokens1,000,000 tokens
Max output tokens128,000 tokens128,000 tokens
Performance tierPremiumPremium
Vision / image inputYesYes
Function callingYesYes
JSON modeYesYes
Prompt cachingYesNo
Batch API (50% discount)YesNo
Extended reasoningYesYes
Fine-tuningNoNo
Rate limit (req/min)4,000Not published

Claude Opus 4.6 notes

Latest Anthropic flagship. Extended thinking available. Prompt caching reduces cost by up to 90%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Claude Opus 4.6 cheaper than Claude Opus 4.8?

Claude Opus 4.6 and Claude Opus 4.8 cost the same at standard usage (1,000 input + 500 output tokens, 100K requests/month): $1,750.00/month each. For different token ratios, use the calculator above.

Which model has a larger context window, Claude Opus 4.6 or Claude Opus 4.8?

Claude Opus 4.8 has a larger context window at 1,000,000 tokens, compared to 200,000 tokens for Claude Opus 4.6. A larger context window is important for processing long documents, multi-turn conversations, or large codebases without truncation.

Do Claude Opus 4.6 and Claude Opus 4.8 support the Batch API?

Claude Opus 4.6 supports the Batch API (50% discount for async processing), while Claude Opus 4.8 does not. If your workload tolerates up to 24-hour latency, routing to Claude Opus 4.6 with batch pricing could significantly cut costs versus Claude Opus 4.8's standard rate.

Which model offers better prompt caching?

Claude Opus 4.6 supports prompt caching at $0.50/M for cached input, while Claude Opus 4.8 does not offer prompt caching. For RAG applications or chatbots with large, repeated context, Claude Opus 4.6's caching capability can substantially reduce effective costs.

What are the best use cases for Claude Opus 4.6 vs Claude Opus 4.8?

Claude Opus 4.6 is best suited for Code generation, Document summarization, RAG / Semantic search, while Claude Opus 4.8 is optimized for General chatbot. Choose based on which use case matches your primary workload — and validate with the cost calculator above to confirm the total monthly spend fits your budget.

What is the cost per request for Claude Opus 4.6 vs Claude Opus 4.8?

At 1,000 input tokens and 500 output tokens per request — a typical conversational workload — Claude Opus 4.6 costs $0.017500 per request and Claude Opus 4.8 costs $0.017500 per request. At 100,000 requests/month, that translates to $1,750.00 and $1,750.00 respectively. Use the interactive calculator to adjust these parameters for your actual workload.

Claude Opus 4.6 vs Claude Opus 4.8: Summary

When comparing Claude Opus 4.6 and Claude Opus 4.8 for API cost, the right choice depends on your workload's token profile, required features, and tolerance for latency. Both models cost the same at standard usage volumes (1,000 input + 500 output tokens per request at 100,000 requests/month) at $1,750.00/month.

Both models are priced in USD per million tokens, the standard unit across all major AI API providers. Claude Opus 4.6 charges $5.00/M for input tokens and $25.00/M for output tokens. Claude Opus 4.8 charges $5.00/M input and $25.00/M output. If your workload is output-heavy (more tokens generated than consumed as input), the model with the lower output price compounds cost savings significantly at scale.

Prompt caching is supported by Claude Opus 4.6 but not Claude Opus 4.8. For workloads with large, repeated system prompts or document context — such as RAG pipelines or multi-turn conversations with a fixed knowledge base — prompt caching can reduce effective input costs by 60–90%, which may change the cost ranking between these two models at your specific usage pattern.

Context window capacity differs between the two: Claude Opus 4.8 supports up to 1,000,000 tokens in a single request, versus 200,000 tokens for Claude Opus 4.6. A larger context window is essential for document summarization, large codebase analysis, and multi-document retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) applications.

Use the interactive calculator at the top of this page to enter your actual token usage and monthly request volume for a precise cost comparison tailored to your workload. Adjust for batch API discounts and prompt caching to find the most cost-effective option for your specific deployment.

Explore other model comparisons from the same providers or performance tiers.

Related Provider Pages

View complete pricing tables and model lineups for the providers behind these models.

Relevant Use Cases

See cost recommendations for workloads where Claude Opus 4.6 or Claude Opus 4.8 is recommended.