Skip to main content

Claude Opus 4.1 vs o4-mini (Azure): API Cost Comparison

Compare the API pricing, context windows, features, and real-world cost projections for Claude Opus 4.1 (Anthropic) and o4-mini (Azure) (Azure OpenAI). Use the interactive calculator below to compute your exact monthly cost based on your token usage and request volume.

Prices verified Mar 24, 2026

Interactive Cost Calculator

AnthropicClaude Opus 4.1Azure OpenAIo4-mini (Azure)

Fills in typical token counts for a workload type

Tokens in each prompt sent to the model

Tokens generated in each response

Total API calls per month

Showing costs for 2 models. Cheapest: o4-mini (Azure) at $33.00/month.

Cheapest: o4-mini (Azure) at $33.00/mo — save 93.7% vs Claude Opus 4.1
Alert
Besto4-mini (Azure)
Azure OpenAI$33.00$0.003300$11.00$22.0093.7%Alerts coming soon
Claude Opus 4.1
Anthropic$525.00$0.052500$150.00$375.00Alerts coming soon

Monthly Cost Comparison

Price Comparison at a Glance

All prices are in USD per 1 million tokens ($/M tokens). Lower is cheaper.

Pricing TypeClaude Opus 4.1o4-mini (Azure)Cheaper
Input (standard)$15.00/M$1.10/Mo4-mini (Azure)
Output$75.00/M$4.40/Mo4-mini (Azure)
Cached input$1.50/MN/A
Batch input$7.50/MN/A
Batch output$37.50/MN/A

Prices last verified: 2026-03-11 – 2026-03-24

Cost Breakdown by Usage Volume

Estimated monthly costs at different request volumes, assuming 1,000 input tokens and 500 output tokens per request. Adjust in the calculator above for your specific use case.

VolumeClaude Opus 4.1Monthlyo4-mini (Azure)MonthlyClaude Opus 4.1Per requesto4-mini (Azure)Per request
1K requests/mo$52.50$3.30$0.052500$0.003300
10K requests/mo$525.00$33.00$0.052500$0.003300
100K requests/mo$5,250.00$330.00$0.052500$0.003300
1M requests/mo$52,500.00$3,300.00$0.052500$0.003300

Green values indicate the lower-cost option at each volume tier. Cost per request is calculated at 1,000 input + 500 output tokens using standard (non-batch, non-cached) pricing.

Price History

Input price per 1M tokens

When to Choose Claude Opus 4.1

by Anthropic

  • Code generation
  • Document summarization

Input / 1M tokens

$15.00/M

Output / 1M tokens

$75.00/M

Context window

200,000

Tier

premium

When to Choose o4-mini (Azure)

by Azure OpenAI

  • Code generation
  • Text classification
  • Rag Retrieval

Input / 1M tokens

$1.10/M

Output / 1M tokens

$4.40/M

Context window

200,000

Tier

reasoning

Key Differences Beyond Price

Cost is only one factor in choosing an AI model. Context window size, rate limits, supported features, and latency all affect whether a model fits your use case.

CapabilityClaude Opus 4.1o4-mini (Azure)
Context window200,000 tokens200,000 tokens
Max output tokens32,000 tokens100,000 tokens
Performance tierPremiumReasoning
Vision / image inputYesYes
Function callingYesYes
JSON modeYesYes
Prompt cachingYesNo
Batch API (50% discount)YesNo
Extended reasoningYesYes
Fine-tuningNoNo
Rate limit (req/min)4,000Not published

Claude Opus 4.1 notes

Premium pricing. Consider Opus 4.5/4.6 for better price-performance ratio.

o4-mini (Azure) notes

o4-mini reasoning model via Azure OpenAI Service. Cost-efficient reasoning for enterprise workloads. Excellent for coding and analytical tasks at scale on Azure.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Claude Opus 4.1 cheaper than o4-mini (Azure)?

At standard usage (1,000 input tokens, 500 output tokens, 100,000 requests/month), o4-mini (Azure) costs $330.00/month versus $5,250.00/month for Claude Opus 4.1 — a 94% saving. Your actual savings will vary based on your token profile; output-heavy workloads amplify differences in output pricing.

Which model has a larger context window, Claude Opus 4.1 or o4-mini (Azure)?

Both Claude Opus 4.1 and o4-mini (Azure) have the same context window: 200,000 tokens.

Do Claude Opus 4.1 and o4-mini (Azure) support the Batch API?

Claude Opus 4.1 supports the Batch API (50% discount for async processing), while o4-mini (Azure) does not. If your workload tolerates up to 24-hour latency, routing to Claude Opus 4.1 with batch pricing could significantly cut costs versus o4-mini (Azure)'s standard rate.

Which model offers better prompt caching?

Claude Opus 4.1 supports prompt caching at $1.50/M for cached input, while o4-mini (Azure) does not offer prompt caching. For RAG applications or chatbots with large, repeated context, Claude Opus 4.1's caching capability can substantially reduce effective costs.

What are the best use cases for Claude Opus 4.1 vs o4-mini (Azure)?

Both models are well-suited for Code generation. Claude Opus 4.1 is particularly strong for Document summarization. o4-mini (Azure) is favored for Text classification, Rag Retrieval. At the same quality level, the lower-cost model is usually preferable; use this page's calculator to compare total monthly spend at your volume.

What is the cost per request for Claude Opus 4.1 vs o4-mini (Azure)?

At 1,000 input tokens and 500 output tokens per request — a typical conversational workload — Claude Opus 4.1 costs $0.052500 per request and o4-mini (Azure) costs $0.003300 per request. At 100,000 requests/month, that translates to $5,250.00 and $330.00 respectively. Use the interactive calculator to adjust these parameters for your actual workload.

Claude Opus 4.1 vs o4-mini (Azure): Summary

When comparing Claude Opus 4.1 and o4-mini (Azure) for API cost, the right choice depends on your workload's token profile, required features, and tolerance for latency. o4-mini (Azure) offers lower total cost at standard usage volumes (1,000 input + 500 output tokens per request at 100,000 requests/month) at $330.00/month, compared to $5,250.00/month for Claude Opus 4.1.

Both models are priced in USD per million tokens, the standard unit across all major AI API providers. Claude Opus 4.1 charges $15.00/M for input tokens and $75.00/M for output tokens. o4-mini (Azure) charges $1.10/M input and $4.40/M output. If your workload is output-heavy (more tokens generated than consumed as input), the model with the lower output price compounds cost savings significantly at scale.

Prompt caching is supported by Claude Opus 4.1 but not o4-mini (Azure). For workloads with large, repeated system prompts or document context — such as RAG pipelines or multi-turn conversations with a fixed knowledge base — prompt caching can reduce effective input costs by 60–90%, which may change the cost ranking between these two models at your specific usage pattern.

Context window capacity differs between the two: Both models support 200,000 tokens per request. A larger context window is essential for document summarization, large codebase analysis, and multi-document retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) applications.

Use the interactive calculator at the top of this page to enter your actual token usage and monthly request volume for a precise cost comparison tailored to your workload. Adjust for batch API discounts and prompt caching to find the most cost-effective option for your specific deployment.

Explore other model comparisons from the same providers or performance tiers.

Related Provider Pages

View complete pricing tables and model lineups for the providers behind these models.

Relevant Use Cases

See cost recommendations for workloads where Claude Opus 4.1 or o4-mini (Azure) is recommended.