Skip to main content

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs GPT-4o (Azure): API Cost Comparison

Compare the API pricing, context windows, features, and real-world cost projections for Claude Haiku 4.5 (Anthropic) and GPT-4o (Azure) (Azure OpenAI). Use the interactive calculator below to compute your exact monthly cost based on your token usage and request volume.

Prices verified Mar 24, 2026

Interactive Cost Calculator

AnthropicClaude Haiku 4.5Azure OpenAIGPT-4o (Azure)

Fills in typical token counts for a workload type

Tokens in each prompt sent to the model

Tokens generated in each response

Total API calls per month

Showing costs for 2 models. Cheapest: Claude Haiku 4.5 at $35.00/month.

Cheapest: Claude Haiku 4.5 at $35.00/mo — save 53.3% vs GPT-4o (Azure)
Alert
BestClaude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic$35.00$0.003500$10.00$25.0053.3%Alerts coming soon
GPT-4o (Azure)
Azure OpenAI$75.00$0.007500$25.00$50.00Alerts coming soon

Monthly Cost Comparison

Price Comparison at a Glance

All prices are in USD per 1 million tokens ($/M tokens). Lower is cheaper.

Pricing TypeClaude Haiku 4.5GPT-4o (Azure)Cheaper
Input (standard)$1.00/M$2.50/MClaude Haiku 4.5
Output$5.00/M$10.00/MClaude Haiku 4.5
Cached input$0.10/MN/A
Batch input$0.50/MN/A
Batch output$2.50/MN/A

Prices last verified: 2026-03-11 – 2026-03-24

Cost Breakdown by Usage Volume

Estimated monthly costs at different request volumes, assuming 1,000 input tokens and 500 output tokens per request. Adjust in the calculator above for your specific use case.

VolumeClaude Haiku 4.5MonthlyGPT-4o (Azure)MonthlyClaude Haiku 4.5Per requestGPT-4o (Azure)Per request
1K requests/mo$3.50$7.50$0.003500$0.007500
10K requests/mo$35.00$75.00$0.003500$0.007500
100K requests/mo$350.00$750.00$0.003500$0.007500
1M requests/mo$3,500.00$7,500.00$0.003500$0.007500

Green values indicate the lower-cost option at each volume tier. Cost per request is calculated at 1,000 input + 500 output tokens using standard (non-batch, non-cached) pricing.

Price History

Input price per 1M tokens

When to Choose Claude Haiku 4.5

by Anthropic

  • Customer support
  • Text classification
  • Data extraction

Input / 1M tokens

$1.00/M

Output / 1M tokens

$5.00/M

Context window

200,000

Tier

budget

When to Choose GPT-4o (Azure)

by Azure OpenAI

  • General chatbot
  • Content Creation
  • Data extraction

Input / 1M tokens

$2.50/M

Output / 1M tokens

$10.00/M

Context window

128,000

Tier

mid

Key Differences Beyond Price

Cost is only one factor in choosing an AI model. Context window size, rate limits, supported features, and latency all affect whether a model fits your use case.

CapabilityClaude Haiku 4.5GPT-4o (Azure)
Context window200,000 tokens128,000 tokens
Max output tokens64,000 tokens16,384 tokens
Performance tierBudgetMid
Vision / image inputYesYes
Function callingYesYes
JSON modeYesYes
Prompt cachingYesNo
Batch API (50% discount)YesNo
Extended reasoningYesNo
Fine-tuningNoNo
Rate limit (req/min)4,000Not published

Claude Haiku 4.5 notes

Improved Haiku with better accuracy. Slightly more expensive than Haiku 3.5.

GPT-4o (Azure) notes

GPT-4o via Azure OpenAI Service. Enterprise features include Azure AD auth, VNet support, content filtering, and compliance certifications (SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA).

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Claude Haiku 4.5 cheaper than GPT-4o (Azure)?

At standard usage (1,000 input tokens, 500 output tokens, 100,000 requests/month), Claude Haiku 4.5 costs $350.00/month versus $750.00/month for GPT-4o (Azure) — a 53% saving. Your actual savings will vary based on your token profile; output-heavy workloads amplify differences in output pricing.

Which model has a larger context window, Claude Haiku 4.5 or GPT-4o (Azure)?

Claude Haiku 4.5 has a larger context window at 200,000 tokens, compared to 128,000 tokens for GPT-4o (Azure). A larger context window is important for processing long documents, multi-turn conversations, or large codebases without truncation.

Do Claude Haiku 4.5 and GPT-4o (Azure) support the Batch API?

Claude Haiku 4.5 supports the Batch API (50% discount for async processing), while GPT-4o (Azure) does not. If your workload tolerates up to 24-hour latency, routing to Claude Haiku 4.5 with batch pricing could significantly cut costs versus GPT-4o (Azure)'s standard rate.

Which model offers better prompt caching?

Claude Haiku 4.5 supports prompt caching at $0.10/M for cached input, while GPT-4o (Azure) does not offer prompt caching. For RAG applications or chatbots with large, repeated context, Claude Haiku 4.5's caching capability can substantially reduce effective costs.

What are the best use cases for Claude Haiku 4.5 vs GPT-4o (Azure)?

Both models are well-suited for Data extraction. Claude Haiku 4.5 is particularly strong for Customer support, Text classification. GPT-4o (Azure) is favored for General chatbot, Content Creation. At the same quality level, the lower-cost model is usually preferable; use this page's calculator to compare total monthly spend at your volume.

What is the cost per request for Claude Haiku 4.5 vs GPT-4o (Azure)?

At 1,000 input tokens and 500 output tokens per request — a typical conversational workload — Claude Haiku 4.5 costs $0.003500 per request and GPT-4o (Azure) costs $0.007500 per request. At 100,000 requests/month, that translates to $350.00 and $750.00 respectively. Use the interactive calculator to adjust these parameters for your actual workload.

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs GPT-4o (Azure): Summary

When comparing Claude Haiku 4.5 and GPT-4o (Azure) for API cost, the right choice depends on your workload's token profile, required features, and tolerance for latency. Claude Haiku 4.5 offers lower total cost at standard usage volumes (1,000 input + 500 output tokens per request at 100,000 requests/month) at $350.00/month, compared to $750.00/month for GPT-4o (Azure).

Both models are priced in USD per million tokens, the standard unit across all major AI API providers. Claude Haiku 4.5 charges $1.00/M for input tokens and $5.00/M for output tokens. GPT-4o (Azure) charges $2.50/M input and $10.00/M output. If your workload is output-heavy (more tokens generated than consumed as input), the model with the lower output price compounds cost savings significantly at scale.

Prompt caching is supported by Claude Haiku 4.5 but not GPT-4o (Azure). For workloads with large, repeated system prompts or document context — such as RAG pipelines or multi-turn conversations with a fixed knowledge base — prompt caching can reduce effective input costs by 60–90%, which may change the cost ranking between these two models at your specific usage pattern.

Context window capacity differs between the two: Claude Haiku 4.5 supports up to 200,000 tokens in a single request, versus 128,000 tokens for GPT-4o (Azure). A larger context window is essential for document summarization, large codebase analysis, and multi-document retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) applications.

Use the interactive calculator at the top of this page to enter your actual token usage and monthly request volume for a precise cost comparison tailored to your workload. Adjust for batch API discounts and prompt caching to find the most cost-effective option for your specific deployment.

Explore other model comparisons from the same providers or performance tiers.

Related Provider Pages

View complete pricing tables and model lineups for the providers behind these models.

Relevant Use Cases

See cost recommendations for workloads where Claude Haiku 4.5 or GPT-4o (Azure) is recommended.