Skip to main content

Claude Haiku 3 vs Llama 3.1 8B (Cerebras): API Cost Comparison

Compare the API pricing, context windows, features, and real-world cost projections for Claude Haiku 3 (Anthropic) and Llama 3.1 8B (Cerebras) (Cerebras). Use the interactive calculator below to compute your exact monthly cost based on your token usage and request volume.

Prices verified Mar 24, 2026

Interactive Cost Calculator

AnthropicClaude Haiku 3CerebrasLlama 3.1 8B (Cerebras)

Fills in typical token counts for a workload type

Tokens in each prompt sent to the model

Tokens generated in each response

Total API calls per month

Showing costs for 2 models. Cheapest: Llama 3.1 8B (Cerebras) at $1.50/month.

Cheapest: Llama 3.1 8B (Cerebras) at $1.50/mo — save 82.9% vs Claude Haiku 3
Alert
BestLlama 3.1 8B (Cerebras)
Cerebras$1.50$0.000150$1.00$0.5082.9%Alerts coming soon
Claude Haiku 3
Anthropic$8.75$0.000875$2.50$6.25Alerts coming soon

Monthly Cost Comparison

Price Comparison at a Glance

All prices are in USD per 1 million tokens ($/M tokens). Lower is cheaper.

Pricing TypeClaude Haiku 3Llama 3.1 8B (Cerebras)Cheaper
Input (standard)$0.25/M$0.10/MLlama 3.1 8B (Cerebras)
Output$1.25/M$0.10/MLlama 3.1 8B (Cerebras)
Cached input$0.03/MN/A
Batch input$0.13/MN/A
Batch output$0.63/MN/A

Prices last verified: 2026-03-10 – 2026-03-24

Cost Breakdown by Usage Volume

Estimated monthly costs at different request volumes, assuming 1,000 input tokens and 500 output tokens per request. Adjust in the calculator above for your specific use case.

VolumeClaude Haiku 3MonthlyLlama 3.1 8B (Cerebras)MonthlyClaude Haiku 3Per requestLlama 3.1 8B (Cerebras)Per request
1K requests/mo$0.88$0.15$0.000875$0.000150
10K requests/mo$8.75$1.50$0.000875$0.000150
100K requests/mo$87.50$15.00$0.000875$0.000150
1M requests/mo$875.00$150.00$0.000875$0.000150

Green values indicate the lower-cost option at each volume tier. Cost per request is calculated at 1,000 input + 500 output tokens using standard (non-batch, non-cached) pricing.

Price History

Input price per 1M tokens

When to Choose Claude Haiku 3

by Anthropic

  • Text classification
  • Data extraction

Input / 1M tokens

$0.25/M

Output / 1M tokens

$1.25/M

Context window

200,000

Tier

budget

When to Choose Llama 3.1 8B (Cerebras)

by Cerebras

  • Customer support
  • Text classification
  • General chatbot

Input / 1M tokens

$0.10/M

Output / 1M tokens

$0.10/M

Context window

128,000

Tier

budget

Key Differences Beyond Price

Cost is only one factor in choosing an AI model. Context window size, rate limits, supported features, and latency all affect whether a model fits your use case.

CapabilityClaude Haiku 3Llama 3.1 8B (Cerebras)
Context window200,000 tokens128,000 tokens
Max output tokens4,096 tokens8,192 tokens
Performance tierBudgetBudget
Vision / image inputYesNo
Function callingYesYes
JSON modeYesYes
Prompt cachingYesNo
Batch API (50% discount)YesNo
Extended reasoningNoNo
Fine-tuningNoNo
Rate limit (req/min)4,000Not published

Claude Haiku 3 notes

Deprecated. Retiring April 19, 2026. Use Haiku 3.5 or Haiku 4.5 instead.

Llama 3.1 8B (Cerebras) notes

Cerebras wafer-scale inference: ~2,200 tokens/sec — roughly 20x faster than GPU providers. Ideal for latency-sensitive real-time applications.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Claude Haiku 3 cheaper than Llama 3.1 8B (Cerebras)?

At standard usage (1,000 input tokens, 500 output tokens, 100,000 requests/month), Llama 3.1 8B (Cerebras) costs $15.00/month versus $87.50/month for Claude Haiku 3 — a 83% saving. Your actual savings will vary based on your token profile; output-heavy workloads amplify differences in output pricing.

Which model has a larger context window, Claude Haiku 3 or Llama 3.1 8B (Cerebras)?

Claude Haiku 3 has a larger context window at 200,000 tokens, compared to 128,000 tokens for Llama 3.1 8B (Cerebras). A larger context window is important for processing long documents, multi-turn conversations, or large codebases without truncation.

Do Claude Haiku 3 and Llama 3.1 8B (Cerebras) support the Batch API?

Claude Haiku 3 supports the Batch API (50% discount for async processing), while Llama 3.1 8B (Cerebras) does not. If your workload tolerates up to 24-hour latency, routing to Claude Haiku 3 with batch pricing could significantly cut costs versus Llama 3.1 8B (Cerebras)'s standard rate.

Which model offers better prompt caching?

Claude Haiku 3 supports prompt caching at $0.03/M for cached input, while Llama 3.1 8B (Cerebras) does not offer prompt caching. For RAG applications or chatbots with large, repeated context, Claude Haiku 3's caching capability can substantially reduce effective costs.

What are the best use cases for Claude Haiku 3 vs Llama 3.1 8B (Cerebras)?

Both models are well-suited for Text classification. Claude Haiku 3 is particularly strong for Data extraction. Llama 3.1 8B (Cerebras) is favored for Customer support, General chatbot. At the same quality level, the lower-cost model is usually preferable; use this page's calculator to compare total monthly spend at your volume.

What is the cost per request for Claude Haiku 3 vs Llama 3.1 8B (Cerebras)?

At 1,000 input tokens and 500 output tokens per request — a typical conversational workload — Claude Haiku 3 costs $0.000875 per request and Llama 3.1 8B (Cerebras) costs $0.000150 per request. At 100,000 requests/month, that translates to $87.50 and $15.00 respectively. Use the interactive calculator to adjust these parameters for your actual workload.

Claude Haiku 3 vs Llama 3.1 8B (Cerebras): Summary

When comparing Claude Haiku 3 and Llama 3.1 8B (Cerebras) for API cost, the right choice depends on your workload's token profile, required features, and tolerance for latency. Llama 3.1 8B (Cerebras) offers lower total cost at standard usage volumes (1,000 input + 500 output tokens per request at 100,000 requests/month) at $15.00/month, compared to $87.50/month for Claude Haiku 3.

Both models are priced in USD per million tokens, the standard unit across all major AI API providers. Claude Haiku 3 charges $0.25/M for input tokens and $1.25/M for output tokens. Llama 3.1 8B (Cerebras) charges $0.10/M input and $0.10/M output. If your workload is output-heavy (more tokens generated than consumed as input), the model with the lower output price compounds cost savings significantly at scale.

Prompt caching is supported by Claude Haiku 3 but not Llama 3.1 8B (Cerebras). For workloads with large, repeated system prompts or document context — such as RAG pipelines or multi-turn conversations with a fixed knowledge base — prompt caching can reduce effective input costs by 60–90%, which may change the cost ranking between these two models at your specific usage pattern.

Context window capacity differs between the two: Claude Haiku 3 supports up to 200,000 tokens in a single request, versus 128,000 tokens for Llama 3.1 8B (Cerebras). A larger context window is essential for document summarization, large codebase analysis, and multi-document retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) applications.

Use the interactive calculator at the top of this page to enter your actual token usage and monthly request volume for a precise cost comparison tailored to your workload. Adjust for batch API discounts and prompt caching to find the most cost-effective option for your specific deployment.

Explore other model comparisons from the same providers or performance tiers.

Related Provider Pages

View complete pricing tables and model lineups for the providers behind these models.

Relevant Use Cases

See cost recommendations for workloads where Claude Haiku 3 or Llama 3.1 8B (Cerebras) is recommended.