Skip to main content

Claude 3.5 Sonnet v2 (Bedrock) vs Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: API Cost Comparison

Compare the API pricing, context windows, features, and real-world cost projections for Claude 3.5 Sonnet v2 (Bedrock) (AWS Bedrock) and Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite (Google). Use the interactive calculator below to compute your exact monthly cost based on your token usage and request volume.

Prices verified Mar 24, 2026

Interactive Cost Calculator

AWS BedrockClaude 3.5 Sonnet v2 (Bedrock)GoogleGemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Fills in typical token counts for a workload type

Tokens in each prompt sent to the model

Tokens generated in each response

Total API calls per month

Showing costs for 2 models. Cheapest: Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite at $3.00/month.

Cheapest: Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite at $3.00/mo — save 97.1% vs Claude 3.5 Sonnet v2 (Bedrock)
Alert
BestGemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Google$3.00$0.000300$1.00$2.0097.1%Alerts coming soon
Claude 3.5 Sonnet v2 (Bedrock)
AWS Bedrock$105.00$0.010500$30.00$75.00Alerts coming soon

Monthly Cost Comparison

Price Comparison at a Glance

All prices are in USD per 1 million tokens ($/M tokens). Lower is cheaper.

Pricing TypeClaude 3.5 Sonnet v2 (Bedrock)Gemini 2.5 Flash-LiteCheaper
Input (standard)$3.00/M$0.10/MGemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Output$15.00/M$0.40/MGemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Cached inputN/A$0.01/M
Batch inputN/A$0.05/M
Batch outputN/A$0.20/M

Prices last verified: 2026-03-11 – 2026-03-24

Cost Breakdown by Usage Volume

Estimated monthly costs at different request volumes, assuming 1,000 input tokens and 500 output tokens per request. Adjust in the calculator above for your specific use case.

VolumeClaude 3.5 Sonnet v2 (Bedrock)MonthlyGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteMonthlyClaude 3.5 Sonnet v2 (Bedrock)Per requestGemini 2.5 Flash-LitePer request
1K requests/mo$10.50$0.30$0.010500$0.000300
10K requests/mo$105.00$3.00$0.010500$0.000300
100K requests/mo$1,050.00$30.00$0.010500$0.000300
1M requests/mo$10,500.00$300.00$0.010500$0.000300

Green values indicate the lower-cost option at each volume tier. Cost per request is calculated at 1,000 input + 500 output tokens using standard (non-batch, non-cached) pricing.

Price History

Input price per 1M tokens

When to Choose Claude 3.5 Sonnet v2 (Bedrock)

by AWS Bedrock

  • Code generation
  • Data extraction
  • Content Creation

Input / 1M tokens

$3.00/M

Output / 1M tokens

$15.00/M

Context window

200,000

Tier

premium

When to Choose Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

by Google

  • Text classification
  • Data extraction

Input / 1M tokens

$0.10/M

Output / 1M tokens

$0.40/M

Context window

1,048,576

Tier

budget

Key Differences Beyond Price

Cost is only one factor in choosing an AI model. Context window size, rate limits, supported features, and latency all affect whether a model fits your use case.

CapabilityClaude 3.5 Sonnet v2 (Bedrock)Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Context window200,000 tokens1,048,576 tokens
Max output tokens8,192 tokens8,192 tokens
Performance tierPremiumBudget
Vision / image inputYesYes
Function callingYesYes
JSON modeYesYes
Prompt cachingNoYes
Batch API (50% discount)YesYes
Extended reasoningNoNo
Fine-tuningNoNo
Rate limit (req/min)Not published4,000

Claude 3.5 Sonnet v2 (Bedrock) notes

Claude 3.5 Sonnet v2 via AWS Bedrock. Supports computer use. AWS IAM auth with full CloudTrail audit logging.

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite notes

Cheapest Gemini 2.5 model. 1M context at budget pricing.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Claude 3.5 Sonnet v2 (Bedrock) cheaper than Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite?

At standard usage (1,000 input tokens, 500 output tokens, 100,000 requests/month), Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite costs $30.00/month versus $1,050.00/month for Claude 3.5 Sonnet v2 (Bedrock) — a 97% saving. Your actual savings will vary based on your token profile; output-heavy workloads amplify differences in output pricing.

Which model has a larger context window, Claude 3.5 Sonnet v2 (Bedrock) or Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite?

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite has a larger context window at 1,048,576 tokens, compared to 200,000 tokens for Claude 3.5 Sonnet v2 (Bedrock). A larger context window is important for processing long documents, multi-turn conversations, or large codebases without truncation.

Do Claude 3.5 Sonnet v2 (Bedrock) and Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite support the Batch API?

Yes — both Claude 3.5 Sonnet v2 (Bedrock) and Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite support batch API processing, which offers a 50% discount on input and output costs in exchange for up to 24-hour turnaround. Ideal for offline workloads like bulk document processing or nightly classification pipelines.

Which model offers better prompt caching?

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite supports prompt caching at $0.01/M for cached input, while Claude 3.5 Sonnet v2 (Bedrock) does not offer prompt caching. For RAG applications or chatbots with large, repeated context, Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite's caching capability can substantially reduce effective costs.

What are the best use cases for Claude 3.5 Sonnet v2 (Bedrock) vs Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite?

Both models are well-suited for Data extraction. Claude 3.5 Sonnet v2 (Bedrock) is particularly strong for Code generation, Content Creation. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is favored for Text classification. At the same quality level, the lower-cost model is usually preferable; use this page's calculator to compare total monthly spend at your volume.

What is the cost per request for Claude 3.5 Sonnet v2 (Bedrock) vs Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite?

At 1,000 input tokens and 500 output tokens per request — a typical conversational workload — Claude 3.5 Sonnet v2 (Bedrock) costs $0.010500 per request and Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite costs $0.000300 per request. At 100,000 requests/month, that translates to $1,050.00 and $30.00 respectively. Use the interactive calculator to adjust these parameters for your actual workload.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet v2 (Bedrock) vs Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: Summary

When comparing Claude 3.5 Sonnet v2 (Bedrock) and Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite for API cost, the right choice depends on your workload's token profile, required features, and tolerance for latency. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite offers lower total cost at standard usage volumes (1,000 input + 500 output tokens per request at 100,000 requests/month) at $30.00/month, compared to $1,050.00/month for Claude 3.5 Sonnet v2 (Bedrock).

Both models are priced in USD per million tokens, the standard unit across all major AI API providers. Claude 3.5 Sonnet v2 (Bedrock) charges $3.00/M for input tokens and $15.00/M for output tokens. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite charges $0.10/M input and $0.40/M output. If your workload is output-heavy (more tokens generated than consumed as input), the model with the lower output price compounds cost savings significantly at scale.

Prompt caching is supported by Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite but not Claude 3.5 Sonnet v2 (Bedrock). For workloads with large, repeated system prompts or document context — such as RAG pipelines or multi-turn conversations with a fixed knowledge base — prompt caching can reduce effective input costs by 60–90%, which may change the cost ranking between these two models at your specific usage pattern.

Context window capacity differs between the two: Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite supports up to 1,048,576 tokens in a single request, versus 200,000 tokens for Claude 3.5 Sonnet v2 (Bedrock). A larger context window is essential for document summarization, large codebase analysis, and multi-document retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) applications.

Use the interactive calculator at the top of this page to enter your actual token usage and monthly request volume for a precise cost comparison tailored to your workload. Adjust for batch API discounts and prompt caching to find the most cost-effective option for your specific deployment.

Explore other model comparisons from the same providers or performance tiers.

Related Provider Pages

View complete pricing tables and model lineups for the providers behind these models.

Relevant Use Cases

See cost recommendations for workloads where Claude 3.5 Sonnet v2 (Bedrock) or Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is recommended.