Skip to main content

Amazon Nova Lite vs Claude Haiku 3.5: API Cost Comparison

Compare the API pricing, context windows, features, and real-world cost projections for Amazon Nova Lite (AWS Bedrock) and Claude Haiku 3.5 (Anthropic). Use the interactive calculator below to compute your exact monthly cost based on your token usage and request volume.

Prices verified Mar 11, 2026

Interactive Cost Calculator

AWS BedrockAmazon Nova LiteAnthropicClaude Haiku 3.5

Fills in typical token counts for a workload type

Tokens in each prompt sent to the model

Tokens generated in each response

Total API calls per month

Showing costs for 2 models. Cheapest: Amazon Nova Lite at $1.80/month.

Cheapest: Amazon Nova Lite at $1.80/mo — save 93.6% vs Claude Haiku 3.5
Alert
BestAmazon Nova Lite
AWS Bedrock$1.80$0.000180$0.60$1.2093.6%Alerts coming soon
Claude Haiku 3.5
Anthropic$28.00$0.002800$8.00$20.00Alerts coming soon

Monthly Cost Comparison

Price Comparison at a Glance

All prices are in USD per 1 million tokens ($/M tokens). Lower is cheaper.

Pricing TypeAmazon Nova LiteClaude Haiku 3.5Cheaper
Input (standard)$0.06/M$0.80/MAmazon Nova Lite
Output$0.24/M$4.00/MAmazon Nova Lite
Cached inputN/A$0.08/M
Batch inputN/A$0.40/M
Batch outputN/A$2.00/M

Prices last verified: 2026-03-08 – 2026-03-11

Cost Breakdown by Usage Volume

Estimated monthly costs at different request volumes, assuming 1,000 input tokens and 500 output tokens per request. Adjust in the calculator above for your specific use case.

VolumeAmazon Nova LiteMonthlyClaude Haiku 3.5MonthlyAmazon Nova LitePer requestClaude Haiku 3.5Per request
1K requests/mo$0.18$2.80$0.000180$0.002800
10K requests/mo$1.80$28.00$0.000180$0.002800
100K requests/mo$18.00$280.00$0.000180$0.002800
1M requests/mo$180.00$2,800.00$0.000180$0.002800

Green values indicate the lower-cost option at each volume tier. Cost per request is calculated at 1,000 input + 500 output tokens using standard (non-batch, non-cached) pricing.

Price History

Input price per 1M tokens

When to Choose Amazon Nova Lite

by AWS Bedrock

  • Summarization
  • Data extraction
  • Translation

Input / 1M tokens

$0.06/M

Output / 1M tokens

$0.24/M

Context window

300,000

Tier

budget

When to Choose Claude Haiku 3.5

by Anthropic

  • Customer support
  • Text classification
  • Data extraction

Input / 1M tokens

$0.80/M

Output / 1M tokens

$4.00/M

Context window

200,000

Tier

budget

Key Differences Beyond Price

Cost is only one factor in choosing an AI model. Context window size, rate limits, supported features, and latency all affect whether a model fits your use case.

CapabilityAmazon Nova LiteClaude Haiku 3.5
Context window300,000 tokens200,000 tokens
Max output tokens5,120 tokens8,192 tokens
Performance tierBudgetBudget
Vision / image inputYesYes
Function callingYesYes
JSON modeYesYes
Prompt cachingNoYes
Batch API (50% discount)YesYes
Extended reasoningNoNo
Fine-tuningYesNo
Rate limit (req/min)Not published4,000

Amazon Nova Lite notes

Amazon Nova Lite supports image and video inputs. Very cost-effective for multimodal pipelines. Strong choice for large-scale document processing on AWS.

Claude Haiku 3.5 notes

Best Anthropic model for cost-sensitive applications. Significantly faster than Sonnet.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Amazon Nova Lite cheaper than Claude Haiku 3.5?

At standard usage (1,000 input tokens, 500 output tokens, 100,000 requests/month), Amazon Nova Lite costs $18.00/month versus $280.00/month for Claude Haiku 3.5 — a 94% saving. Your actual savings will vary based on your token profile; output-heavy workloads amplify differences in output pricing.

Which model has a larger context window, Amazon Nova Lite or Claude Haiku 3.5?

Amazon Nova Lite has a larger context window at 300,000 tokens, compared to 200,000 tokens for Claude Haiku 3.5. A larger context window is important for processing long documents, multi-turn conversations, or large codebases without truncation.

Do Amazon Nova Lite and Claude Haiku 3.5 support the Batch API?

Yes — both Amazon Nova Lite and Claude Haiku 3.5 support batch API processing, which offers a 50% discount on input and output costs in exchange for up to 24-hour turnaround. Ideal for offline workloads like bulk document processing or nightly classification pipelines.

Which model offers better prompt caching?

Claude Haiku 3.5 supports prompt caching at $0.08/M for cached input, while Amazon Nova Lite does not offer prompt caching. For RAG applications or chatbots with large, repeated context, Claude Haiku 3.5's caching capability can substantially reduce effective costs.

What are the best use cases for Amazon Nova Lite vs Claude Haiku 3.5?

Both models are well-suited for Data extraction. Amazon Nova Lite is particularly strong for Summarization, Translation. Claude Haiku 3.5 is favored for Customer support, Text classification. At the same quality level, the lower-cost model is usually preferable; use this page's calculator to compare total monthly spend at your volume.

What is the cost per request for Amazon Nova Lite vs Claude Haiku 3.5?

At 1,000 input tokens and 500 output tokens per request — a typical conversational workload — Amazon Nova Lite costs $0.000180 per request and Claude Haiku 3.5 costs $0.002800 per request. At 100,000 requests/month, that translates to $18.00 and $280.00 respectively. Use the interactive calculator to adjust these parameters for your actual workload.

Amazon Nova Lite vs Claude Haiku 3.5: Summary

When comparing Amazon Nova Lite and Claude Haiku 3.5 for API cost, the right choice depends on your workload's token profile, required features, and tolerance for latency. Amazon Nova Lite offers lower total cost at standard usage volumes (1,000 input + 500 output tokens per request at 100,000 requests/month) at $18.00/month, compared to $280.00/month for Claude Haiku 3.5.

Both models are priced in USD per million tokens, the standard unit across all major AI API providers. Amazon Nova Lite charges $0.06/M for input tokens and $0.24/M for output tokens. Claude Haiku 3.5 charges $0.80/M input and $4.00/M output. If your workload is output-heavy (more tokens generated than consumed as input), the model with the lower output price compounds cost savings significantly at scale.

Prompt caching is supported by Claude Haiku 3.5 but not Amazon Nova Lite. For workloads with large, repeated system prompts or document context — such as RAG pipelines or multi-turn conversations with a fixed knowledge base — prompt caching can reduce effective input costs by 60–90%, which may change the cost ranking between these two models at your specific usage pattern.

Context window capacity differs between the two: Amazon Nova Lite supports up to 300,000 tokens in a single request, versus 200,000 tokens for Claude Haiku 3.5. A larger context window is essential for document summarization, large codebase analysis, and multi-document retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) applications.

Use the interactive calculator at the top of this page to enter your actual token usage and monthly request volume for a precise cost comparison tailored to your workload. Adjust for batch API discounts and prompt caching to find the most cost-effective option for your specific deployment.

Explore other model comparisons from the same providers or performance tiers.

Related Provider Pages

View complete pricing tables and model lineups for the providers behind these models.

Relevant Use Cases

See cost recommendations for workloads where Amazon Nova Lite or Claude Haiku 3.5 is recommended.